<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Giant Owl or Photoshop?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/winged-weirdies/giant-owl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/winged-weirdies/giant-owl/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Lake Monsters, Sea Serpents and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:00:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aargeee</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/winged-weirdies/giant-owl/comment-page-1/#comment-81024</link>
		<dc:creator>aargeee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 13:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=57459#comment-81024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cass_of_MPLS thank you for your information. I think you researched this quite thoroughly! I like you checked all media and even gave the local law enforcement info. Due to your arguments I now lean heavily towards the idea that it is indeed fake.  

But like Photoexpert, in my heart I know there are still spectacular discoveries to be made in the animal kingdom. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cass_of_MPLS thank you for your information. I think you researched this quite thoroughly! I like you checked all media and even gave the local law enforcement info. Due to your arguments I now lean heavily towards the idea that it is indeed fake.  </p>
<p>But like Photoexpert, in my heart I know there are still spectacular discoveries to be made in the animal kingdom. <img src='http://www.cryptomundo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cass_of_MPLS</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/winged-weirdies/giant-owl/comment-page-1/#comment-81020</link>
		<dc:creator>Cass_of_MPLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 02:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=57459#comment-81020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No doubt a &quot;bird expert&quot; (ornithologist) might very well say that the &quot;giant owl&quot; is within the realm of &quot;possibility&quot; because, strictly speaking, EVERYTHING is.  But in the realm of probability it is far more likely to be a hoax. Carrizo Springs (which is in Southwestern Texas) has only one newspaper (The Javelin) and they charge for the &quot;E&quot; edition $5.00 for a one week trial Just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.carrizospringsjavelin.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;click&lt;/a&gt; if you think it&#039;s worth it. I don&#039;t, frankly,  but it does suggest who MIGHT be behind the photo since unlike most newspapers they won&#039;t even allow you a limited search of their online edition without getting some cash from you.

NONE of the major news media in the area has mentioned this story even as a &quot;silly supplement&quot;.

Which is another indication that it&#039;s just another fake.

As for law enforcement it is the Dimmit County Sherriff&#039;s Department that covers Carrizo Springs and you can contact THEM via
Phone: (830) 876-9263 
or
Fax: (830) 876-9263

or you snail-mail them at

103 N 5TH ST
Carrizo Springs, TX 
78834

If you would like to ask them about their giant owl.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt a &#8220;bird expert&#8221; (ornithologist) might very well say that the &#8220;giant owl&#8221; is within the realm of &#8220;possibility&#8221; because, strictly speaking, EVERYTHING is.  But in the realm of probability it is far more likely to be a hoax. Carrizo Springs (which is in Southwestern Texas) has only one newspaper (The Javelin) and they charge for the &#8220;E&#8221; edition $5.00 for a one week trial Just <a href="http://www.carrizospringsjavelin.com/" rel="nofollow">click</a> if you think it&#8217;s worth it. I don&#8217;t, frankly,  but it does suggest who MIGHT be behind the photo since unlike most newspapers they won&#8217;t even allow you a limited search of their online edition without getting some cash from you.</p>
<p>NONE of the major news media in the area has mentioned this story even as a &#8220;silly supplement&#8221;.</p>
<p>Which is another indication that it&#8217;s just another fake.</p>
<p>As for law enforcement it is the Dimmit County Sherriff&#8217;s Department that covers Carrizo Springs and you can contact THEM via<br />
Phone: (830) 876-9263<br />
or<br />
Fax: (830) 876-9263</p>
<p>or you snail-mail them at</p>
<p>103 N 5TH ST<br />
Carrizo Springs, TX<br />
78834</p>
<p>If you would like to ask them about their giant owl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aargeee</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/winged-weirdies/giant-owl/comment-page-1/#comment-81017</link>
		<dc:creator>aargeee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=57459#comment-81017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What would a bird expert say? 

Photoexpert i like youre comments. It ís in the realm of possibility!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would a bird expert say? </p>
<p>Photoexpert i like youre comments. It ís in the realm of possibility!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cryptoraptor</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/winged-weirdies/giant-owl/comment-page-1/#comment-80997</link>
		<dc:creator>Cryptoraptor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 17:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=57459#comment-80997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clearly this is not a story that the Carrizo Springs, Texas media cares a whole lot about.

How difficult would it to be for locals to determine if the officers in the photo are really from Carrizo Springs, track them down, and ask them if the owl was really that big?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly this is not a story that the Carrizo Springs, Texas media cares a whole lot about.</p>
<p>How difficult would it to be for locals to determine if the officers in the photo are really from Carrizo Springs, track them down, and ask them if the owl was really that big?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dylan</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/winged-weirdies/giant-owl/comment-page-1/#comment-80981</link>
		<dc:creator>dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 15:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=57459#comment-80981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though Texas would be south of its usual range across the Northern Hemisphere, it might be a &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Grey_Owl&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Great Gray Owl&lt;/a&gt;&quot;, believed to be the world&#039;s largest owl.

Great Grays have frequently showed up outside their usual range when feeding competition pressures and other factors make them roam. And they often end up like this poor bugger, shot for a trophy.

At their largest they weigh just a bit over four pounds.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though Texas would be south of its usual range across the Northern Hemisphere, it might be a &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Grey_Owl" rel="nofollow">Great Gray Owl</a>&#8220;, believed to be the world&#8217;s largest owl.</p>
<p>Great Grays have frequently showed up outside their usual range when feeding competition pressures and other factors make them roam. And they often end up like this poor bugger, shot for a trophy.</p>
<p>At their largest they weigh just a bit over four pounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keeganjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/winged-weirdies/giant-owl/comment-page-1/#comment-80977</link>
		<dc:creator>keeganjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 00:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=57459#comment-80977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if you zoom in on the hand of the guy to the left, it looks to me like his hand is infront of the owl.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you zoom in on the hand of the guy to the left, it looks to me like his hand is infront of the owl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fhqwhgads</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/winged-weirdies/giant-owl/comment-page-1/#comment-80976</link>
		<dc:creator>Fhqwhgads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 00:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=57459#comment-80976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pattern in the ground texture looks to me like it has been altered.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pattern in the ground texture looks to me like it has been altered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cass_of_MPLS</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/winged-weirdies/giant-owl/comment-page-1/#comment-80970</link>
		<dc:creator>Cass_of_MPLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=57459#comment-80970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look, all you have to do is blow the picture up to see it is photoshopped. The head doesn&#039;t even fit in the body.

The body is that of the Snowy Owl while the head appears to be that of the Burrowing owl..although it is a little to pixilated to be certain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, all you have to do is blow the picture up to see it is photoshopped. The head doesn&#8217;t even fit in the body.</p>
<p>The body is that of the Snowy Owl while the head appears to be that of the Burrowing owl..although it is a little to pixilated to be certain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhotoExpert</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/winged-weirdies/giant-owl/comment-page-1/#comment-80968</link>
		<dc:creator>PhotoExpert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=57459#comment-80968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One more thing: If one is going to hoax a photograph, this would be a perfect example of how to do it. If you have a known creature such as a cat or a dog, you put parameters on how big to enlarge the creature in a photograph or how small you wish it to be. If it is too large or too small, it will come off as an obvious hoax. So you make it look almost natural but within the realm of it occurring naturally. But 9 times out of 10, the hoaxer will get the photo proportions correct but the rest of the story does not fit when common sense is applied to the scenario. Common sense goes a long way, sometimes more than simple photographic analysis.

Excuse my typos in the above post. I just got up from a nap. way=weigh. And there are a couple of missing words in a few sentences. Not my normal posting style. Off to get a cup of coffee.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing: If one is going to hoax a photograph, this would be a perfect example of how to do it. If you have a known creature such as a cat or a dog, you put parameters on how big to enlarge the creature in a photograph or how small you wish it to be. If it is too large or too small, it will come off as an obvious hoax. So you make it look almost natural but within the realm of it occurring naturally. But 9 times out of 10, the hoaxer will get the photo proportions correct but the rest of the story does not fit when common sense is applied to the scenario. Common sense goes a long way, sometimes more than simple photographic analysis.</p>
<p>Excuse my typos in the above post. I just got up from a nap. way=weigh. And there are a couple of missing words in a few sentences. Not my normal posting style. Off to get a cup of coffee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhotoExpert</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/winged-weirdies/giant-owl/comment-page-1/#comment-80964</link>
		<dc:creator>PhotoExpert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=57459#comment-80964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am in agreement with maslo63, AlyoshaK, sasquatch, and aargeee. I am in agreement with them, not on the basis of any photographic analysis I did, but rather their astute observations and logical thought processes.

That is a rather large owl. As AlyoshaK pointed out, it looks like a typical cell phone photograph. With that being said, it would be a waste of my time to try and look for a cut paste or digital manipulation in analyzing the photograph. I did a cursory review of it for about a minute and it looks to be a genuine photograph with no glaring or obvious manipulation. It is what it appears to be.

As maslo63 pointed out, birds to not way that much. So any person posting here that two men could not hold up such a bird is beyond me. I agree with maslo63, just because what he says makes perfect common sense.

So sometimes, photographic analysis is not needed, just good common sense will do. Sasquatch posted that it is about the biggest owl he has ever seen. Ditto, I agree. It is not beyond the possibility of this owl occurring naturally in the wild. It&#039;s similar to when I see a big fish picture. I say to myself, WOW, what a huge fish. I have never seen one that big. And common sense tells me that is not beyond of possibility that a fish of that species can grow that big. I just have not personally seen one. So this is no mystery to me. I don&#039;t automatically scream &quot;fake&quot;. I just have not seen one that big but in my heart, I KNOW they exist.

aargeee mirrors my sentiments above in his post. When we see a poor pixel count on a photo, it automatically becomes suspicious, one way or another. How true that is! Some will immediately call fake and some will immediately say it is real. This is when common sense should kick in for those of us who are deciding whether a photograph is authentic or not. 

For me, common sense tells me that the way this photo was taken, is that the photographer just happen to be there with and took a photo with the only camera he had on hand, his cell phone camera. Nothing out of the ordinary there. And it looks like the men in uniform were there for a reason, they probably received a call and were simply doing their jobs. The photo is not blatantly or poorly digitally manipulated at a cursory glance.

So we have to ask ourselves the question, could an owl this big exist naturally in the wild? If it were a 20 foot owl, I would scream fake and begin to look for clues to back up that statement. But this owl is in the realm of a naturally occurring creature and could easily exist in the wild. There might even be a few owls that are larger. So I lean towards it being real. I evaluate the other points using common sense and come to the conclusion it is a real owl in this photo. 

With that being said, I would like to know more about it and the circumstances surrounding this find.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in agreement with maslo63, AlyoshaK, sasquatch, and aargeee. I am in agreement with them, not on the basis of any photographic analysis I did, but rather their astute observations and logical thought processes.</p>
<p>That is a rather large owl. As AlyoshaK pointed out, it looks like a typical cell phone photograph. With that being said, it would be a waste of my time to try and look for a cut paste or digital manipulation in analyzing the photograph. I did a cursory review of it for about a minute and it looks to be a genuine photograph with no glaring or obvious manipulation. It is what it appears to be.</p>
<p>As maslo63 pointed out, birds to not way that much. So any person posting here that two men could not hold up such a bird is beyond me. I agree with maslo63, just because what he says makes perfect common sense.</p>
<p>So sometimes, photographic analysis is not needed, just good common sense will do. Sasquatch posted that it is about the biggest owl he has ever seen. Ditto, I agree. It is not beyond the possibility of this owl occurring naturally in the wild. It&#8217;s similar to when I see a big fish picture. I say to myself, WOW, what a huge fish. I have never seen one that big. And common sense tells me that is not beyond of possibility that a fish of that species can grow that big. I just have not personally seen one. So this is no mystery to me. I don&#8217;t automatically scream &#8220;fake&#8221;. I just have not seen one that big but in my heart, I KNOW they exist.</p>
<p>aargeee mirrors my sentiments above in his post. When we see a poor pixel count on a photo, it automatically becomes suspicious, one way or another. How true that is! Some will immediately call fake and some will immediately say it is real. This is when common sense should kick in for those of us who are deciding whether a photograph is authentic or not. </p>
<p>For me, common sense tells me that the way this photo was taken, is that the photographer just happen to be there with and took a photo with the only camera he had on hand, his cell phone camera. Nothing out of the ordinary there. And it looks like the men in uniform were there for a reason, they probably received a call and were simply doing their jobs. The photo is not blatantly or poorly digitally manipulated at a cursory glance.</p>
<p>So we have to ask ourselves the question, could an owl this big exist naturally in the wild? If it were a 20 foot owl, I would scream fake and begin to look for clues to back up that statement. But this owl is in the realm of a naturally occurring creature and could easily exist in the wild. There might even be a few owls that are larger. So I lean towards it being real. I evaluate the other points using common sense and come to the conclusion it is a real owl in this photo. </p>
<p>With that being said, I would like to know more about it and the circumstances surrounding this find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk
Database Caching 27/48 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk

 Served from: www.cryptomundo.com @ 2013-05-21 00:03:12 by W3 Total Cache -->