Comments on: Legends of Mysterious Slant-Eyed Giants

By: KryptoKelly

KryptoKelly — Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:40:17 +0000

Cryptokellie~ I also have a golden/lab mix, Buttercup. She’s sweet. She’s 10 years old with the most amazing temperament. She gets spoiled a lot these days as we don’t know how much time we have with her …hips etc. But she’s the best dog we’ve ever had the pleasure of owning. Nowadays foxes and coyotes don’t faze her much anymore. But she’s a good girl, so loyal and happy. Sorry about the name, if you wish I will change it. No hard feelings you had it first, let me know.

By: Fhqwhgads

Fhqwhgads — Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:08:27 +0000

By the way, is the “hand print” supposed to be in that picture? I don’t see it. The most prominent images to me are the stick figures with either wild hair, antennae, or some kind of starburst haloes.

By: Fhqwhgads

Fhqwhgads — Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:05:02 +0000

@Goodfoot

Absolutely. It’s a well-known fact that the last 4 presidents have been sasquatch who used Nair to disguise themselves.

By: Goodfoot

Goodfoot — Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:29:55 +0000

MattB: Orders from above. That’s the way DC works. Who? I can throw out alphabet soup, but it’s impossible to say from whom.

By: Goodfoot

Goodfoot — Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:27:37 +0000

cryptokellie: a red fox, I’d assume. I saw a many one myself, quite a shocking sight, as it was within a fenced federal location (or formerly so). The more surprising thing is that the mange makes them look HUGE.

And we need to start saying, “ChupacabraS”; I don’t know how or why that got corrupted.

By: Matt Bille via Facebook

Matt Bille via Facebook — Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:25:43 +0000

Dear Lord, not the Smithsonian cover-up again. What possible motive could be behind such an action?

By: cryptokellie

cryptokellie — Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:13:17 +0000

Hi KryptoKelly,

I use cryptokellie. The Kellie being my beloved – now departed – golden retriever Kellie. She once alerted me the only “Chupacabra” I ever saw…a mangy fox.

Very strange looking but, a mangy fox all the same.

By: semillama

semillama — Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:07:33 +0000

One needs to keep firmly in mind that the scientists of the 19th century operated in a very different world than those of today, and that many, if not all, the reports of “giant” skeletons found in mounds originated from excavations that were not conducted by scientists or archaeologists as we would recognize today. Unfortunately, much of what was excavated from 19th century mounds are lost, especially the human remains, so these reports are not verifiable. I chalk most of them up to the desire to tell a good story; although some of them may be tied into attempts to deny Native American origins to mounds.

By: Mary Zambrano-Dominguez via Facebook

Mary Zambrano-Dominguez via Facebook — Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:57:18 +0000

Lucky