Comments on: Is It The Great Pumpkin? Or The MOMO Monster?

By: tropicalwolf

tropicalwolf — Tue, 25 May 2010 23:12:51 +0000

I usually make it a rule to skip over and not read all the new posts about movies that have been dominating Crytomundo recently….now I remember why.

By: Loren Coleman

Loren Coleman — Tue, 25 May 2010 10:26:59 +0000

Too bad that even a bad scifi film like this couldn’t have tried to stick a little more closely to the completely hair-covered, Bigfoot-type, faceless description of the original MOMO, if they were going to use the name.

By: SIRUPAPERS

SIRUPAPERS — Tue, 25 May 2010 05:57:50 +0000

Aw shucks, we just can’t stay mad at you! Anyhow, as much fun as this little endeavor looks I think it does give us a moment to ask if Momo and other “swamp apes” are more aggressive (if they actually are) than “traditional” bigfoot because we have encroached more deeply into their habitats, or if it is a symptom of genetic diseases caused by constant inbreeding? Momo is clearly group of sasquatch suffering from macrocephaly, which can be the result of several genetic conditions. A restricted breeding population could allow such a condition to become prevalant in seveal generations. I believe that it is no coincedence that Momo, and the three-toed “lizardmen”, represent not only the most aggressive sasquatch, but also the most sick.

By: SIRUPAPERS

SIRUPAPERS — Tue, 25 May 2010 05:40:54 +0000

No. No we will not…

By: JackScram

JackScram — Tue, 25 May 2010 04:47:29 +0000

It’s not a stem, it’s a topknot. No, seriously….

By: Hambone

Hambone — Tue, 25 May 2010 02:11:43 +0000

I think it is MOMO the pumpkin eater