<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian Cryptid Cops Part IV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/evidence/cryptid-cops4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/evidence/cryptid-cops4/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:01:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: twblack</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/evidence/cryptid-cops4/comment-page-1/#comment-13843</link>
		<dc:creator>twblack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/canadian-cryptid-cops-part-iv/#comment-13843</guid>
		<description>If it was the same BF then that would pretty cool. The fact thet no one ever sighted it could just be no one wanted to report it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it was the same BF then that would pretty cool. The fact thet no one ever sighted it could just be no one wanted to report it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Green</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/evidence/cryptid-cops4/comment-page-1/#comment-13842</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/canadian-cryptid-cops-part-iv/#comment-13842</guid>
		<description>It would be really interesting to see a copy of the tracing of the footprint if it is available. Any information on where we might see it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be really interesting to see a copy of the tracing of the footprint if it is available. Any information on where we might see it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dudlow</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/evidence/cryptid-cops4/comment-page-1/#comment-13841</link>
		<dc:creator>Dudlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/canadian-cryptid-cops-part-iv/#comment-13841</guid>
		<description>The sasquatch known as &#039;Old Yellow Top&#039; was spotted over a 50 year period (or longer) around the Kirkland Lake mining district of mid-northern Ontario. While we really don&#039;t know how long these creatures live, how far or for what reasons they may migrate, it does appear that &#039;OYT&#039; stuck around a specific territory for a very long time.

In the above case concerning The Pas, Manitoba through to the Ruby Creek area, we are talking utter wilderness all the way. That anyone was out there to find the prints in the first place is all the more remarkable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sasquatch known as &#8216;Old Yellow Top&#8217; was spotted over a 50 year period (or longer) around the Kirkland Lake mining district of mid-northern Ontario. While we really don&#8217;t know how long these creatures live, how far or for what reasons they may migrate, it does appear that &#8216;OYT&#8217; stuck around a specific territory for a very long time.</p>
<p>In the above case concerning The Pas, Manitoba through to the Ruby Creek area, we are talking utter wilderness all the way. That anyone was out there to find the prints in the first place is all the more remarkable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Eyed Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/evidence/cryptid-cops4/comment-page-1/#comment-13840</link>
		<dc:creator>One Eyed Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/canadian-cryptid-cops-part-iv/#comment-13840</guid>
		<description>Well if not the same sasquatch, possibly an offspring that inherited the feature?

Given how easily people never see what is basically in front of them on a walk in the woods, is it really that surprising a large animal can go such distances unseen? Especially if an observer could convince him/herself he/she didn&#039;t see what he/she thought he/she saw?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if not the same sasquatch, possibly an offspring that inherited the feature?</p>
<p>Given how easily people never see what is basically in front of them on a walk in the woods, is it really that surprising a large animal can go such distances unseen? Especially if an observer could convince him/herself he/she didn&#8217;t see what he/she thought he/she saw?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe levit</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/evidence/cryptid-cops4/comment-page-1/#comment-13839</link>
		<dc:creator>joe levit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/canadian-cryptid-cops-part-iv/#comment-13839</guid>
		<description>I would say it is more likely to be a second creature from the same species, with a footprint in a nearly identical range of size. And, the reports don&#039;t mean that it went undetected by humans across that distance. It just means that if anyone saw it they neither disclosed the information nor led anyone to possible tracks. Very likely, considering many witnesses never report a sighting for fear of ridicule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say it is more likely to be a second creature from the same species, with a footprint in a nearly identical range of size. And, the reports don&#8217;t mean that it went undetected by humans across that distance. It just means that if anyone saw it they neither disclosed the information nor led anyone to possible tracks. Very likely, considering many witnesses never report a sighting for fear of ridicule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mnynames</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/evidence/cryptid-cops4/comment-page-1/#comment-13838</link>
		<dc:creator>Mnynames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/canadian-cryptid-cops-part-iv/#comment-13838</guid>
		<description>That must be one old Sasquatch...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That must be one old Sasquatch&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ole Bub</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/evidence/cryptid-cops4/comment-page-1/#comment-13837</link>
		<dc:creator>Ole Bub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/canadian-cryptid-cops-part-iv/#comment-13837</guid>
		<description>Good Morning John...

The Canadian sasquatch saga continues to unfold...thank you for sharing.

seeing is believing...

ole bub and the dawgs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning John&#8230;</p>
<p>The Canadian sasquatch saga continues to unfold&#8230;thank you for sharing.</p>
<p>seeing is believing&#8230;</p>
<p>ole bub and the dawgs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HowieYowie</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/evidence/cryptid-cops4/comment-page-1/#comment-13836</link>
		<dc:creator>HowieYowie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/canadian-cryptid-cops-part-iv/#comment-13836</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused. John, you say the tracing &quot;appears to have just four toes.&quot;

I found a web page which has a picture of what it says is &quot;...the Ruby Creek Print, based on John Green’s tracing of Dunn’s trace. There is some debate whether it was actually 4 or 5 toed...&quot; However, I can see five toes in the picture.

The picture is near the bottom of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bermuda-triangle.org/html/ruby_creek_incident.html&quot;&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;d be interested to see a picture of the tracing you referenced in preparing your article. Is there one online?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused. John, you say the tracing &#8220;appears to have just four toes.&#8221;</p>
<p>I found a web page which has a picture of what it says is &#8220;&#8230;the Ruby Creek Print, based on John Green’s tracing of Dunn’s trace. There is some debate whether it was actually 4 or 5 toed&#8230;&#8221; However, I can see five toes in the picture.</p>
<p>The picture is near the bottom of <a href="http://www.bermuda-triangle.org/html/ruby_creek_incident.html">this page</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested to see a picture of the tracing you referenced in preparing your article. Is there one online?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
