Posted by: Ken Gerhard on April 26th, 2013
For my first ever Cryptomundo post, I thought it would be fitting to reflect on the Loch Ness mystery for a couple of reasons. First off, it was at age fifteen (back in 1982) that I wandered the shores of the mist-shrouded loch, armed with my little super 8 movie camera in hopes of, capturing footage of a monster. As it turned out, that particular enterprise became an influential event in my life.
But more importantly, this month marks the 80th anniversary of the first notable sighting – that of hotel owners John and Aldie Mackay who, watched a monster-sized fish thrash around on the lake’s surface for several minutes during April 14th, 1933. Moreover, the month of April seems to bear a great deal of significance with regard to Scotland’s grand cryptozoological enigma. For example, it was during April of 1934 that the famous surgeon’s photo, taken by Dr. Robert Kenneth Wilson was allegedly taken, though that famous, tantalizing image has since been exposed as a clever hoax.
Yet, perhaps the most important piece of evidence is 500 feet of 16 millimeter film that was shot by aeronautical engineer Tim Dinsdale on April 23rd, 1960.
Despite the fact that, like most photographic evidence of a cryptozoological nature, it remains controversial after all of these years, in my mind it stands as the single most compelling argument that some massive animal dwells in the lake. The footage has been scrutinized by many, including England’s JARIC intelligence division who, concluded that it showed a large, animate object of unknown nature swimming about. Skeptics have argued that the distant object was merely a boat, but there appears to be a shadowy body trailing beneath the surface that would suggest otherwise.
Seemingly, the vast majority of Nessie photos strike me as being fishy (no pun intended), including the highly publicized underwater images taken in the mid 1970s by Robert Rines and his Academy of Applied Science. However, can we really dismiss hundreds of eyewitness reports that have been logged through the years? Surely not every one can be discounted as merely a tall tale or misidentification of a boat wake. And how about the handful of sonar images that have been documented, showing a large mass swimming around that is much larger than any native species? Loch Ness is certainly very deep with poor visibility and an adequate food supply. And descriptions of the monster coincide very well with other lake monsters around the word, as well as the Great Sea Serpents that have been logged for centuries.
Most Cryptomundo readers are savvy enough to be familiar with the prevalent theories. Several eminent investigators including Richard Freeman, feel that Nessie may be a fifteen-foot eel. Others have suggested a relict from the past such as a surviving plesiosaur or snakelike whale (zeuglodon). Roy Mackal proposed a monstrous amphibian and Ted Holiday favored a gargantuan sea slug.
For my money, the best explanation for the Loch Ness Monster may be a case of composite identity. Perhaps there truly are some outsized eels dwelling near the bottom that surface on rare occasions, creating a stir. There is also a strong possibility that large marine animals such as seals and whales have made their way into the loch throughout the years. Media hype, misidentifications and overzealous hotel owners surely have played a part in propagating the legend. However, it is worth noting that Nessie sightings have diminished greatly in recent years, despite the increased presence of tourists and researchers around the loch.
Ultimately we may have to wait another 80 years for definitive answers, as the ancient waters of Loch Ness remain so very cold, dark and deep…