Comments on: Today in Bigfoot History | 1999 | Patty’s “Zipper” Exposed

By: skimmer

skimmer — Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:39:08 +0000

Why a zipper and not a watch chain or draw string? Does the zipper track run horizontal around the waist or verticle up the back or front of the suit? Why a zipper at all–wouldn’t a pull-over be better in that sort of weather? Seams to me that if you built a Bigfoot suit with a four inch long zipper tab you risk that it will show up in your carefully crafted super-long hoax film.

Or it could be a mat of hair that sometimes forms when you don’t use a comb. If the PG film is a hoax that would be an extremely thoughtful detail to include–unless you thought I would think that it is a mat of fur instead of a zipper. Ah–but I thought you would think that I thought you would think that thought, and therefore I think it is not important.

By: Goodfoot

Goodfoot — Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:26:19 +0000

damando485: Where can I get some of this “digital film”?

By: Aardwolf

Aardwolf — Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:48:28 +0000

The new suit does not impress me, what caught my attention was the old picture where he holds a mask identical to face Patty.

By: thatericn

thatericn — Sun, 13 Jan 2013 00:16:15 +0000

Aardwolf - Those videos were already linked from this site a couple of months ago. http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/philip-morris-debunks-bigfoot/ A somewhat thorough discussion ensued.

By: gridbug

gridbug — Sat, 12 Jan 2013 22:34:24 +0000

@ Aardwolf: Morris spins a good tale, but at the end of the day the suit that he recreated for that NatGeo show didn’t look anything like the one in the Patterson film; dimensions are wrong, bulk is wrong, color is wrong, head is wrong, arms are too short. While the jury may still be out on the absolute authenticity of the Patterson film, if Morris truly made a suit for Patterson back in the 60′s, he either can’t make the same thing twice (failing across multiple levels) or he is simply lying.

By: Goodfoot

Goodfoot — Sat, 12 Jan 2013 22:27:57 +0000

Explain WHAT? It’s a garden-variety LIE, and, as such, no explanation is necessary. As for the “zipper pull”, they must have gotten hold of some bad mushrooms.

By: Wolfie0827

Wolfie0827 — Sat, 12 Jan 2013 21:29:43 +0000

Aardwolf, sounds like some has been trying to get back in the business by claiming, “See what I did with the crap I had back then, just imagine what I could do now.”

By: damando485

damando485 — Sat, 12 Jan 2013 20:01:30 +0000

I hardly doubt that anyone would have been able to use State-of-the-art scanners to magnify the image considering that it was done on older non digital film. On the other hand I myself do not consider this film as genuine (more like the best fake film I have seen for this time period). Lets face it these two cowboys just happen to film a Sasquatch walking across a stream bed in full day light with very little interference in regards to trees,brush. First on his horse then off of it and no mention of any foot print video. Now lets go forward in time and nearly all witnesses claim that they (Bf) retreat into the Timber very fast to not be detected. Not to mention most hikers do carry cameras that also have video capabilities and no one has taken anywhere near the length of video that Patterson or Gimlin had.

By: Aardwolf

Aardwolf — Sat, 12 Jan 2013 02:26:15 +0000

HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THIS?!