The geographic isolation thing is, to me, a huge hurdle. I have to disagree with Hoosierhunter; I don’t think the yowie “certainly” has as much a chance of being real as the sasquatch. Geography gives the sas a much better boost. But then, my thinking that way has kept me from a thorough review of evidence that could, if I made a better study of it, change my mind.

I’ll say this too. Don’t know what that track is. But I do know this about hoaxers.

They leave much clearer tracks than that. All of them. Period. I do tend to hear this “hoaxers know you need to be subtle” thing. No they don’t. They know YOU NEED TO SEE THE TRACKS.

And the dog sounds like something that sasquatch have been alleged to do, on a number of occasions, most that I have read coming with other compelling evidence.

However… A possible explanation for Darwin sightings may be explained by what they folks there drink when they buy a “six pack”.

The imprint in the ground looks a bit too regular around the toes as if it were faked. JMHO