Posted by: Loren Coleman on November 11th, 2006
People might wish to view YouTube’s Malaysian Bigfoot video, which is an extract from Jonathan Kent’s BBC report on the subject. The drawings of what the sighted Johor Bigfoot looked like, have a bulky appearance to them, and are worth the viewing alone.
There is also footage of Vincent Chow (above) on the YouTube clip. Kent shows footprints discovered along a creek too.
My thanks to the anonymous Cryptomundo contributor for pointing to this.
This entry was posted
on Saturday, November 11th, 2006 at 7:55 am and is filed under CryptoZoo News, Breaking News, Cryptotourism, Cryptozoologists, Cryptozoology, Pop Culture, Eyewitness Accounts, Malaysian Bigfoot, Homo floresiensis. You can follow responses via our RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is not allowed.
del.icio.us Digg Furl Reddit Ma.gnolia StumbleUpon Technorati Yahoo! Help
- Similar Phenomena:
- New Johor Bigfoot Book »
- Malaysian Bigfoot Caught on Camera ? »
- Sunday Op-Ed Funnies »
- New Bigfoot Footage? »
- Johor Hominid Hand? »
- Johor Bigfoot Cartoons »
Anything that Chow touches is tainted, in my eyes. I am not an expert by far, but the tracks in the video look more like hippo, than an ape-like creature.
Vincent, you sure laid a blow to research in Malaysia…
I haven’t sat down and fleshed out the particulars of the whole story, but it appears that Chow was somewhat duped by the guys that had the pictures - they sort of controlled the flow of information about the pictures. So the impression that I get is that Chow seems more like a victim of the hoax than a hoaxster. I could be wrong, however.
There is no other conclusion, based upon the events that unfolded and were revealed, than to think Vincent Chow was the victim of the photographic hoax.
To consider all the evidence before the photo events as tainted by Chow is short-sighted and not supported by what actually happened. Chow allegedly may be guilty of being too gullible around some findings. But any notion that he was responsible for any manufactured tracks, cooked sightings, or fake pictures is just not part of my understanding of the real history of the Johor Bigfoot.
I actually feel badly for Chow. He appears to have been well intentioned but naively victimized, just as the reading public was in turn duped. And to see Chow soldiering onward now, as if eternally hopeful, regardless, must say something about his stick-to-it-ive-ness. I just hope for all our sakes that past experience has taught him to be a better detective.
But gosh, it does almost seem downright conspiratorial, the way in which virtually every hopeful bit of BF news over the past few years has died a controversial death.
To continue the point made by bambookid, the road tracks look to me as if they might have been made by a Malayan tapir.