Comments on: Yes Man Cometh

By: Loren Coleman

Loren Coleman — Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:59:46 +0000

Bob K’s statement #2 is correct, of course. But it is not a “cover-up” as olejason seems to be implying. As tropicalwolf says, “We’ll see what comes.”

I would just say, there are plenty of sound cryptozoological reasons for supporting the DVD sales of this film!

By: Bob K.

Bob K. — Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:49:29 +0000

Mr. Coleman, I get the feeling that your two comments are:

1) not just tongue in cheek, and

2) that you know more than you’re letting on.

If I’m correct, then I believe that what you’re saying is a good thing.

If I’m not, than as Emily Litella used to say, “Never mind.”

By: olejason

olejason — Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:21:59 +0000

I don’t understand. Are you implying there is some grand bigfoot cover-up by Hollywood? Just a joke? *confused* haha

By: tropicalwolf

tropicalwolf — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:17:40 +0000

I agree with MountDesertIslander about the “relevance” issue of this post. However, I am willing to take Loren’s comment on faith. We’ll see what comes.

By: Loren Coleman

Loren Coleman — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:09:34 +0000

More will be understood about what I’m saying in the next half decade.

By: Loren Coleman

Loren Coleman — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:47:22 +0000

MDI, it is all about cryptozoo-synchromystism. Peyton Reed, the director, is getting people ready for the ultimate future disclosure of all the secrets of Bigfoot, of course.

People should never stop looking for the messages hiding in plain sight.

By: MountDesertIslander

MountDesertIslander — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:43:46 +0000

I’m not sure why “Yes Man” is a subject on this site. However, if you would like to dedicate a thread to crypto-Zooey-ology, I’d read that. Wow is that young woman beautiful.