Posted by: Loren Coleman on September 22nd, 2007
Roger Patterson filmed the footprints of the Bigfoot – and apparently his own, as well:
This post was written by
Loren Coleman – who has written 5492 posts on Cryptomundo.
Loren Coleman no longer writes for Cryptomundo. His archived posts remain here at Cryptomundo.
Email
This entry was posted
on Saturday, September 22nd, 2007 at 2:10 pm and is filed under Artifacts, Bigfoot, Cryptotourism, CryptoZoo News, Cryptozoologists, Cryptozoology, Evidence, Expedition Reports, Eyewitness Accounts, Photos, Sasquatch, Videos. You can follow responses via our RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is not allowed.
Forgive me if I seem stupid, but what exactly is the poster saying? Is this supposedly evidence of a hoax or of the creature existing? I can’t get heads or tails out of what it is supposed to mean…
I was under the impression that the P-G original master copy had been lost. Please explain.
It would be easier to see the tracks with some sort of color enhancement or something…
The quality of this footage is pretty bad, so I can’t tell if those “bootprints” really are what Mr. Davis claims; They look like black smudges to me (at least, I think that’s what the bootprints are supposed to be). Also, Mr. Patterson seems to be pretty manuverable, so (in my mind) this casts doubt Patterson’s “my horse fell on me” version of the encounter.
Also, I doubt that’s a Bigfoot track we see near the supposed bootprints. Why? Because it casts a shadow, which makes it more likely to be a piece of debris.
Also, Patty looks pretty small when seen in this context. Here’s a picture that demonstrates image cropping.
I should note that I did not make any of these images. They were taken from pages 183-184 of this forum (the link will take you to page 183).
My impulsive thoughts upon seeing this unexpected video: A large limb passes in front of the camerea and then off to the side? When did this happen? Also, how sure are we that the artefact on the ground is a bigfoot track? It looks deformed so it could be some naturally caused irregularity in the ground. Is there something else in the original Patterson-Grimlin film that isn’t shown?
ok, i see bootprints, but that “bigfoot” print could be anything, it’s like seeing things in clouds in the sky. “oh look, in this frame here, that shadow looks like a dog”… give me a break.
I wish the credits had been in the beginning, it would have saved me about one minute, thirty seconds of my time.