Comments on: It’s Alive! TG: Table of Contents

By: pellham52

pellham52 — Sat, 04 Dec 2010 11:54:58 +0000

Thanks Red

By: Cryptidhunter 1

Cryptidhunter 1 — Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:25:33 +0000

Absolutely, I look foward to reading the book. I am sure I will enjoy it, as I have enjoyed all of your books. I very well could be wrong about True Giants being the same animal as Bigfoot. I have always considered Bigfoot to be a relict Gigantopithecus ever since I began my research into the subject. So I assumed Bigfoot and True Giants were probably the same species. But I could be wrong.

I enjoy your website and your books. Keep up the great work Loren!

By: Loren Coleman

Loren Coleman — Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:09:04 +0000

With all due respect Cryptidhunter 1, I would appreciate you revisiting here with additional comments after you read the book and digest the many differences between Bigfoot/Sasquatch and True Giants, including five vs four toes per foot, lifestyle, ability to adapt, interactions with humans, and much much more.

By: Cryptidhunter 1

Cryptidhunter 1 — Thu, 02 Dec 2010 21:22:38 +0000

While I do believe in the existence of True Giants, and do not necessarily believe that they are a distinct species from the Classic Bigfoot of the Pacific Northwest. I think that the continued survival of Gigantopithecus blacki successfully explains all of the world's reports of giant bipedal apes. True Giants, IMHO, are merely a subspecies of Bigfoot and not a different species of animal. The physical apperance of Bigfoot and True Giants are almost exactly the same, with the exception of height in which True Giants are several feet taller. However, one must consider the different subspecies of Elephant. The African bush Eeephant is considerably larger than the African forest elephant. In addition to the several subspecies of gorrilla and chimpanzee. What I think we are dealing with here is the survival of a very successful species of primate which has migrated all over the world and established distinct populations with many geographical and regional differences due to the forces of micro evolution. But, personally I believe that all of the worldwide reports of giant bipedal primates are surviving Gigantopithecus blacki with subspecies and regional varieties in differnet parts of the world.

By: red_pill_junkie

red_pill_junkie — Thu, 02 Dec 2010 20:13:42 +0000

@pellham52,

You don’t know how much I sympathize with your situation. I spent a whole year working half-time (with half payment of course) and not being able to find a better job and say good-bye to this crappy one. And things are even worse during the holidays when everyone is supposed to buy buy buy.

While I hope you’ll be able to find a new job soon, perhaps you might be able to ask your local library to acquire a copy of Loren’s book. You never know, right?

Saludos.

By: pellham52

pellham52 — Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:56:57 +0000

Wish I could Loren but I jost lost my job but I will get the book when money isn’t so tight.

By: lordoftheonionrings

lordoftheonionrings — Wed, 01 Dec 2010 22:34:11 +0000

Loren
The book looks great, love the cover art. Just wondering how you figured out the range of giganthropithicus? Everything I have heard about evidence of it existance say its based on a very limited number of teeth and maybe a jawbone. With this very limited amount of fossil evidence how were you able to figure out a range for it.

By: Mahalo X

Mahalo X — Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:30:32 +0000

I can’t wait to read it.
Thank’s Loren, and Happy Festivus!

By: graybear

graybear — Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:46:02 +0000

Can’t wait for my copy to arrive!

By: red_pill_junkie

red_pill_junkie — Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:02:36 +0000

While I’m not certain about the existence of True Giants, there’s no doubt in my mind that this book’s demand will grow to monstrous proportions