Nothing on a thermal video will tell you if it is night or day Wuffing. Mike Green clearly states that he was setting it up at 11:30 at night … That’s what makes me think it was at night.

YL – the last 40 years of cryptozoology have been a catalogue of embarrassment caused by preference for witness testimony over even the most basic forensic analysis of the evidence presented. I’d really like to see bigfoot in the species list, but based on good rigorous study. Witnesses can make mistakes.

You will know that in these thermal images warm things are lighter than cold things. You will also know that in general nighttime is colder than daytime, and thin things lose and gain heat from the environment faster than thick things.

Now go look at the trees in the thermal footage again, and compare them with the recreation video.

Nothing on a thermal video will tell you if it is night or day Wuffing. Mike Green clearly states that he was setting it up at 11:30 at night at 41 seconds into the interview.

That’s what makes me think it was at night.

Please…nobody put up another thermal of a bigfoot without showing it on night vision also.

Looking at the thermal video, what makes you think it was taken at night?

Something with so many possible holes in it, without real evidence other than a thermal undefined image is bound to cause suspicion.

Good to see that he has night capable recording gear now to film it. Thermal should only be used as a detection device…if an image is close enough and backed up by night vision, the thermal could be used to validate a bigfoot not being a person in a suit provided it’s calibrated to do so.

Good to see him spending the bucks on technology to help in the search. That’s where the real evidence will come from.

Please…nobody put up another thermal of a bigfoot without showing it on night vision also. Even though it’s new to do this, it’s getting a little old if you know what I mean, and proves nothing at all.

Surely these other people with thermal videos had night vision to look at it eh? If not…why not? It’s much less expensive than thermal and you get a very good image!

Well, that’s making some assumptions I’m not so comfortable making. If I went to that site daily over that period of time trying to get, say, gray fox footage, I suspect I’d almost always be stumped. Even if I’d seen one the first couple of times.

When an animal is as thin on the ground as this one appears to be, I like to be careful making assumptions like “should have,” because we don’t know. One thing I’m sure contributes to its “elusiveness,” other than scientific inattention, is that it doesn’t just hang out for long periods of time in any one place.

One must not be put off by the scepticism of science, that is what science does, sometimes crassly sometimes not. There is a lot of evidence for the reality of Sasquatch, good eyewitness acounts, footcasts, modern and old history, sound recordings, DNA from hair,etc. Only one of these examples has to be true to mean Sasquatch is true and there surely is more than one of example which is 100% true. So take confidence in this do not think because a sceptic can find a hole in a case that does not mean there isnt a case. The sceptic is testing and you fail if you roll over with a lack of conviction forgetting the real evidence.

How this relates to Greens film is that the film has real qualities and opportunities and these should be exploited and not shallowly dismissed. I wonder what enhancement can be made of this type of film, one thing that might enlighten is if the black and white is reversed and then some form of enhancement is attempted. There is some shading on the figure in Greens film which might show up as what I see as a gorilla like figure. With a black figure we are in familiar Sasquatch territory

Photoexpert could possibly advise on this and maybe comment on the potential for this type of photography. I assume the camera does not project infra-red which is under suspicion as giving alarm to Sasquatch.

If his plan with more cameras had worked surely he’d have more footage by now considering the video says it was filmed in the middle of last year.