Springbrook Yowie Is Back!

Posted by: Loren Coleman on March 5th, 2007

Springbrook Yowie

There’s news from the Gold Coast Bulletin in Queensland, for March 2007, of breaking Yowie activity. Paul Cropper sends along the full story, available if you click on the above image.

For more on the past Springbrook Yowie sightings and footprint finds, please see

The Yowie Healy Cropper

The Yowie: In Search of Australia’s Bigfoot by Tony Healy and Paul Cropper.

It is destined to become an instant cryptozoological classic.Dean Harrison, Austalian Yowie Research

Spread the Word!

Similar Phenomena:

5 Responses to “Springbrook Yowie Is Back!”

  1. youcantryreachingme responds:

    Interesting story. The anecdotes regarding 19 people seeing a yowie at once are interesting.

    From a yowie-illiterate :D

    Chris.

  2. sadisticgreen responds:

    I dunno. It sounds as though there has been quite a bit of previous Yowie activity in this area. The fact a book is being released at a similar time doesn’t make me particularly suspicious. It’s not as if the book is being released in the Springbrooke area is it? It’s a bit of a long shot saying that the publishers would travel all the way out there (almost 100 miles from Brisbane) just to stir up interest. I’m not saying it’s unheard of (hello Mr Biscardi) but I’m not buying it!

  3. mystery_man responds:

    youcantryreachingme- If you are a Yowie illiterate, you should pick this book up. It really is well done and has some compelling stuff in there even if, like me, you remain skeptical. I would recommend it for sure.

  4. kidquid responds:

    mystery-man - I agree, I am about 1/2 way through the book and it is excellent. I knew next to nothing about the Yowie phenomenon before and it is a terrific primer.

  5. sausage1 responds:

    Explain this to me.

    A group of nineteen people saw a yowie according to this book. If nineteen people ALL say they saw the same thing, what are the possible reasons?

    1) They are ALL delusional or psychotic
    2) They ALL misidentified something commonplace
    3) They are ALL lying, even after all these years
    4) They ALL actually saw what they say they saw.

    Now tell me. Which is the most likely?

    Answers to me on a £10 note, please. Oh alright, just tell me the answer and send the tenner to Loren.



Leave your comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.

|Top | Content|


Donate Today

Advertisement




|Top | FarBar|



Attention: This is the end of the usable page!
The images below are preloaded standbys only.
This is helpful to those with slower Internet connections.