The truck did not hit anything it was parked. They left the jeep and truck cause the jeep would not start and the truck did not have 4 wheel drive to get out. There was a storm that came up on them and they wanted out so they did not get stuck there for any length of time. So they all piled into another truck and left the jeep and truck there.

Also there were guests there that did not go back when they found the trees placed and marks on the truck. I know bigfoot hunting from a chair is hard work , but take the time to hear what happened before guessing.

Second I would like to point out that when I hit a cow it left all kinds of hair and prints on my car, but it damn near destroyed the car. I doubt seriously that an 500-800lb bipedal ape would do any less damage, but who am I to say he wouldn’t. Maybe he just fell asleep on the hood and drooled a bit while they were out researching. If they did hit the creature, my advice is to speed up next time and do him in. People just think your crazy if you hit a Bigfoot and it doesn’t die in the process.

I’m busy and didn’t follow the link but I’m aware of the investigators and if I’m not mistaken they had the photo awhile back of the Bigfoot next to a tree. A possible but another blobsquatch.

To the best of my knowledge they aren’t hoaxers circa Bicardi, Whitten and Dyer. However, I do think they went overboard for what they found. It’s probably a legit piece of evidence but I have a prior engagement in San Bruno that day I can’t miss.

Let’s withhold judgement until we see what they’ve got. My best,

Lets be serious. It would be ‘a first’ finding nostril prints instead of footprints and makes for a nice and refreshing change. Do you take plaster casts?

I’m sure top primate nostrilogists everywhere are getting very excited about this one.

…and it was one of Nostrildamus’s predictions too, many years ago.

So lets all wait and see!

I suspect CDCs ‘inner child’ may be getting very excited at this point.

DNA in and of itself is never enough to proof any new species (many, if not most would not even admit the possibility of any new species period, let alone sasquatch or another cryptid, when confronted with DNA that is an absolute unknown and has withstood every attempt to identify it. We have who knows how many unknown ape DNA samples we have that are just brushed off as “uh…uh…Sasquatch don’t exist, uh-huh! That’s proof enough for its not existing, yeah!”. The findings should at least merit large scale investigation as to where the DNA came from.), though i did hear about some experiment out west where they used human DNA aside from sperm to create a human embryo.

Perhaps if most or all the unknown Primate DNA collected from the supposed Sasquatch hair samples registers as the same unknown animal (some scientist i heard is collecting the hairs and DNA for large comparison), and could make the DNA create a sperm and ovary, or an ovary and impregnate it with some DNA…perhaps we could grow the thing in a lab and see for ourselves what it turns out to be…?

As for this supposed squatch proof press release…I take a watch and wait stance.

Now if he had his Hand on a copy of Loren’s book “Bigfoot” Then it would be true.

Like I said we will see. There’s always a claim of some kind being show. All you can do is look at it and say for yourself if you trust it or not.