[Dr. DWA sighs. It is a well-known sigh from the great one...the sigh of patience...the sigh of enlightenment....]

How many times do I have to tell you, grasshopper? THE EVIDENCE SPEAKS HERE. Dr. DWA only listens. No story here, grasshopper. Just evidence. Dr. DWA has satisfied himself that the evidence – all of it – points to the existence of the sasquatch. All of this close-minded silliness is simply as static around the edges of Enlightenment.

[Another Enlightenment sigh]

This doesn’t say Dr. DWA seeks nothing more here. He awaits proof. Until then, he is satisfied, and sees no need to provide grasshoppers with “pixs!?!?!?!!?!?!?” …whatever.

Dr. DWA does have one question, however, one question that haunts him constantly. Not the sasquatch; he is satisfied there. Men of great learning, you see, agree with Dr. DWA, go even farther than he does, in fact, with the evidence, to forthright statements that the animal doth indeed exist. Most of the public, ignorant, know not of what they speak here. Yet all that is required is simple reading, of words written by learned ones in relevant fields, men and women whose sheepskins could bury swnoel’s house meters deep. (Do grasshoppers have houses? Dr. DWA muses. Maybe not, with their unwise habit of letting ants do the work…) Much of this verbiage is, the last time Dr. DWA checked, in English.

Oh yes, the question.

Why do those bereft of curiosity, those who sneer at that of which they are ignorant, even come to this shrine of learning? What could be going on there, other than a desire to provide, let us just say, contrast?

THAT is a question.

Looking forward to the pixs.

Given that every significant find in zoology is the result of at least a decade of dedicated full-time work….let’s see, factoring in three weekends a year….that comes to…any century now!

If we “forget the scientific community,” that is.

Well I’ll be darn…. what are you waiting for, get me a picture or video so we can all see him.

I disagree with you, I’m not asking anyone to bring the animal to anyone, how about a decent picture or video.

That’s not asking too much is it?

There’s literally thousands of game cameras out there, just one picture that we can actually make out what it is.

Let’s forget the scientific community… they’re too busy trying to get big $$$$ grants for something other than the “monkey man”

“Makes you wonder why all these small creatures can be found and an 8 foot 1000 pound monkey can’t.”

Not really. Not if you know what’s going on. Here’s what’s going on:

1. Tiny creatures can be carried to somebody, to whom you say: Look, told you so! Try THAT with the “monkey.”

2. When you’ve found one, and you are a professional biologist, you get a camera and take a picture. Kind of easy when you’ve trapped the little guy and it can’t get away. Try that when you’ve just stumbled over a “monkey” three or so times your size that, oh by the way, you know for sure doesn’t exist. Try trapping the “monkey,” while you’re at it, with that purse or game bag or day pack or wallet or whatever it is you happen to be carrying. (I know I will hear about guns in response to this. Read reports for what happens there. Then get out there with a gun and use yours, and problem solved.)

3. People are searching for new little guys, 24/7/365. Absolutely combing the vegetation, in places you will never hear of. All the time. People looking for the “monkey” get out for the occasional weekend, maybe. Good luck finding a fox on that schedule. (I know I will hear about how all these folks should have seen the “monkey.” How do you know that, say, a quarter of them haven’t, and just want to be taken seriously when they find little guys, instead of being thought nuts? Just asking.)

4. Most all of the little guys have analogues elsewhere that are known and accepted by science. Kind of helps the credibility factor (as does their general portability).

5. The “monkey” HAS been found, by thousands of people. We know where it is. The reports tell us where it is. It’s just mainstream science that’s ignorant. And they happen to be the ones with the wherewithal to come back with the proof. Little catch there.

6. People think it’s a “monkey,” which doesn’t help matters.