Cryptomundo » Ozark Mystery What-Is-It?

Ozark Mystery What-Is-It?

Posted by: Loren Coleman on November 16th, 2006

What do you think?

A man was out squirrel hunting in the Ozarks; he killed a squirrel and out of the woods rushed an animal trying to grab the squirrel. So the hunter shot that thing too. Hard to believe? Here are the photographs of the thing, which some people feel has some banding on the body.

As you can see from the dates on the images, the photographs are from October 2006. The location is Ozark, Arkansas, west of Russellville about 45 miles. A similar animal was spotted around Hector. Hector is a tiny hamlet in the Ozark Mountains just about 20 miles north and slightly east of Russellville.

By strange coincidence, the person who forwarded the photographs to our informant is the niece of local fiction writer Charles Gramlich, who wrote a 2002 novel, Cold in the Light, about some bizarre creatures set in the Ozark Mountains. The book is partially based on some of the real background of the area, of course.

The local game warden, known only by the name Ben, went out to check on this animal, and he thought it was a coy-dog, a cross between a dog and a coyote. He said it had dog feet and a coyote mouth. It was "completely eat up with the mange."

The warden added the detail that this thing is the same color of the supposedly "Ozark monster." Nothing else was mentioned about "what" Ozark monster. But see the drawing at the end of this posting, following the photos.

Click on image for full-size version

Hummer

What is this Ozark Mystery? Is it nothing but another diseased-canid-as-cryptid incident?

Meanwhile, if that wasn’t intriguing enough, how about the following drawing of another creature seen but not identified in middle America?

Critter

Thanks to Cryptomundo correspondent Kelly Freeman.

Random Posts

This entry was posted on Thursday, November 16th, 2006 at 1:30 am and is filed under Breaking News, CryptoZoo News, Cryptomundo Exclusive, Cryptotourism, Cryptozoology, Forensic Science. You can follow responses via our RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is not allowed.

Spread the Word!

del.icio.us Digg Furl Reddit StumbleUpon Help

Similar Phenomena:

38 Responses to “Ozark Mystery What-Is-It?”

shovethenos responds: November 16th, 2006 at 2:29 am
Looks like a mangy coyote.

Speaking of the Ozarks: Loren, are you sure that the “Ozark Howler” was fabricated by one hoaxster? You mentioned this before, but there seems to be several sets of accounts of some kind of strange canid, felid, or hyenid(?) collected by a couple different sources. Are you sure this was all a hoax?
TemplarKnight21c responds: November 16th, 2006 at 2:30 am
It looks almost like a very, VERY large meerkat. Probably just a diseased fox, though, or maybe an escaped hunting dog turned feral and acting upon its former training.
shumway10973 responds: November 16th, 2006 at 3:18 am
poor thing. If the jaw was slightly different and there was less hair than it already almost doesn’t have, I’d say it was the elmandorf beast, but it just looks like a sick canine of some sort. The drawing at the bottom looks interesting, though.
mooppoint responds: November 16th, 2006 at 4:10 am
What exactly was the point of stringing the carcass up in that fashion?

To pose the animal in some way to make it appear something more sinister than it might really be?

Just asking.
Dolouren responds: November 16th, 2006 at 5:40 am
It may be a diseased fox, but foxes are a little bit larger than this thing and may be it is a cross between to different animals, but I think this one is a new kind of canid and also there is some similarity to me with the so called “Chupacabras” don’t you think?
ned-kogar responds: November 16th, 2006 at 6:45 am
Denuded of fur, the necks of canids do look surprisingly long.

The drawing presented looks strangely aardwolf-like.
youcantryreachingme responds: November 16th, 2006 at 7:02 am
It’s very very hard, isn’t it? So many animals look similar. Add the factor of missing hair, and who knows? I mean really - who of us is actually qualified to make best guesses as to the identity of a hairless version of an otherwise fur-covered animal? From still photographs of dead specimens strung up into peculiar contortions, no less?

I think I’ll just say I have no idea and leave it at that!
Chris.
kittenz responds: November 16th, 2006 at 7:45 am
Coyote, not fox. With mange. The size, and the color give it away. It’s too large to be a fox and a fox would have black legs. A fox also has a more gracile body shape. It could be a coy-dog but I’d bet on plain old coyote. The “banding” is just the normal coloration of the skin. Looks like a young, possibly pregnant, female. That would explain its ravenous hunger.
Trapster responds: November 16th, 2006 at 8:17 am
That is a coyote with health problems, looks like mange. The ear size, shape and position are the dead give aways. I deal with these little guys frequently and they are very fast learners. It would not surprise me that this one had learned to steal animals that had already been shot. Just like ravens that fly toward the sound of a gunshot in hopes to eat some of the leftovers once the hunters have cleaned their kill.
Loren Coleman responds: November 16th, 2006 at 8:33 am
I will post the details on the Ozark Howler in a separate blog. But for now, let me say, “different sources” and “several sets of cases” were completely fabricated mainly by one individual.
Lordofshades70 responds: November 16th, 2006 at 8:39 am
Why is it that all the canid mystery animals of late, (except the one in Maine) suffer from mange? Is it possible that a new genetic strain has mutated into play in the union between coyotes and dogs? Isn’t mange caused by some type of mite? Perhaps we have some kind of micro-cryptid, a new breed of mite that can strip an animal of fur. Who knows, just an idea.
Nerull responds: November 16th, 2006 at 9:03 am
I vote sick Coyote. Placement of the ears and jaw lead me to this conclusion. Some of you guys say this is too big for a fox. I have seen WAY bigger foxes.

Another point is that there are a lot of foxes and coyotes/ coy-dogs that have skin conditions/mange that are floating around. Many of them live on for years, (depending on location/climate) and act just as ones that do not display these symptoms. Western NY has a pretty big number of foxes that exhibit some of these problems. It almost seems that the frequency that they are turning up is increasing. Perhaps pollution is a more predominate factor in some areas than it used to be.
Alton Higgins responds: November 16th, 2006 at 9:08 am
You can see a close-up of the poor critter’s head here.
DreamKeeper responds: November 16th, 2006 at 9:54 am
I seriously can’t even make a guess on what this is, all I know, is it is totally disgusting. Ick.
Shawshank responds: November 16th, 2006 at 9:57 am
On the Kentucky Bigfoot site there’s mention of a hyena-like animal being seen. Here’s a link to the story.
Riptor responds: November 16th, 2006 at 10:23 am
I don’t know for sure what that animal is, but my guess is that it’s somekind of mangy coyote or dog. Who knows if somebody didn’t shave the snout of the animal and hung it by the neck to make it appear extended.
Might be a hoax. DNA testing is the only way to know for sure.
Shihan responds: November 16th, 2006 at 10:28 am
Coyote or fox - No sense starting an “Ozark Mutant” media frenzy about it. Many animals, including Foxes, Coyote, and even Grizzly Bear have learned to view gun fire as a dinner bell, this animal was probably ill and desperate and ignored it’s usual “caution” instinct. (That’s If the fur wasn’t removed by the person who shot it!)
busterggi responds: November 16th, 2006 at 10:39 am
Yep, definately another sick puppy. Must be a bumper crop of mites this year.
bill green responds: November 16th, 2006 at 10:53 am
hey loren very interesting article about this ozark cryptid . i realy like the photos as well. bill
Labyrinth_13 responds: November 16th, 2006 at 11:12 am
I lived in the Ozarks for a period during the mid-90s and did my share of hunting there. I’d say the critter in that photo is more than likely a mangy coyote.
kittenz responds: November 16th, 2006 at 11:51 am
busterggi Says:

“Must be a bumper crop of mites this year.”

Actually mange is very common and sooner or later it affects almost all young canids born in the wild. Usually the animal eventually overcomes the mite infestation, and becomes pretty resistant to future infestations. Sometimes, if an animal’s immune system is compromised in some way by illness, infection, or some other condition, the mange infestation can become overwhelming and the animal may die from some secondary problem such as a skin infection that leads to septicemia, or from exposure due to the lack of fur. But even animals as severly affected as this one usually survive and eventually regrow their coat.

Most people don’t realize how common and widespread mange is. It affects dogs, squirrels, skunks, cattle, goats… just about all mammals can be affected by sarcoptic mange, even humans (it’s called scabies when humans get it). Cats rarely get mange because in the course of their intensive grooming, their rough tongues remove most of the mites before they have a chance to burrow into the skin.

The closet that most people ever come to wild or even to feral canids is the Animal Planet, so of course a mangy coyote or fox looks weird to them. But it is a common affliction, especially of puppies.
mememe responds: November 16th, 2006 at 12:40 pm
I feel sorry for this Animal. That was one poor sick unhappy beast. At least now I hope it knows peace.

If people wanted to know that much its origin, was a DNA sample taken?

Myself, I as yet see nothing Cryptid here.
captiannemo responds: November 16th, 2006 at 3:32 pm
1.Fox
2.mainge
3.Cryptid
4.priceless
Rillo777 responds: November 16th, 2006 at 7:12 pm
My first thought also was a fox. Without DNA testing though its hard to tell.
They used to say a picture was worth a thousand words. Seems more like it only creates a thousand questions these days.
mememe responds: November 16th, 2006 at 7:13 pm
Poster 13 Alton Higgins , thank you for a link to a closeup of the head.

I notice the poor critter looks a different color in your link, dont know if thats a result of the film or camera or just a different set of pics.

On the same page as the linked closeup I see someone as posted a small pic of a coyote. I agree with their comment that there are things that look the same.

I wonder if the long neck effect is caused by the body weight pulling down on the tied off head.
CryptoGoji responds: November 16th, 2006 at 9:17 pm
I would say either a fox or other Lupine that has mange. The head is a little small to be a Coyote, but if its been out and not being or eating right it could stay small.
sbolin responds: November 16th, 2006 at 10:36 pm
Mr. Coleman, I am the person who forwarded these photos to the informant. Incidentally, the photos were also shown on Fort Smith television channel 5 this week. The story and video can be seen at http://www.5newsonline.com. I typed in “coyote” under search and found the story “Animal baffles Johnson County residents”. The story gives another explanation of the animal. “According to the Hispanic legend, Chupacabra can come in three forms one of which is a strange breed of wild dog, mostly hairless with pronounced eye sockets, teeth and claws.”
Trapster responds: November 16th, 2006 at 10:39 pm
It’s not that the head is small, it’s just the lack of fur that throws of the viewer. If you’ve seen a coyote soaking wet the look is the same once the fur goes flat. I’ll snap afew pics of the coyotes at a refuge I sometimes work for. I think you’ll agree this will be a match.
vet72 responds: November 16th, 2006 at 11:09 pm
I ‘ve seen a carcass of a coyote like the one in the photo while living in California a few years back. It matches up pretty well.
sschaper responds: November 16th, 2006 at 11:32 pm
Coyote.

Now the drawing reminds me of a “dog” that a guy in town has that I’ve run into a few times. I always think “hyena” when I see it. He brought it into church one day. Creepy animal.

The difference is that that animal had a black muzzle like a hyena, the drawing looks like a fox, but with a very odd coat pattern.
purrlcat responds: November 17th, 2006 at 12:25 am
The banding on the neck and shoulder area is what intrigues me. If the skin is banded, then it had fur that was banded also. The banded animal in the drawing matches the banding on the dead one. Interesting.
garyk responds: November 17th, 2006 at 1:29 am
I had an expert with extensive vet and parsitology background take a look. Their finding: a dog with severe mange. The unusual skin on the head has been elephantized by chronic dermatitis.
kittenz responds: November 17th, 2006 at 7:26 am
It’s a coyote. The facial skin is “elephantized” because of the severity of the mange & subsequent secondary infection, probably fungal.

It could be a coy-dog, but it looks more like a coyote. The slender, elongated muzzle is far more indicative of coyote than of dog. It does appear to be pregnant but that could be due to post-mortem swelling.

The “banding” is normal skin coloration. Most “natural-colored” canids, that is, canids with agouti (wolf-type) coloration, exhibit a darker swath of fur, varying in size, over the neck and shoulder area. The darker skin coloration corresponds to that swath of dark fur. Even a sable (tawny) collie, shaved down, exhibits this characteristic. Wild canids such as foxes, coyotes, and wolves all have some degree of sabling (black banding) in their fur, especially about the neck and shoulders. There is nothing unusual about subtly “banded” skin coloration in canids. It is the norm rather than the exception. It does not indicate striping of the coat but rather sabling, which is banding and tipping of the guard hairs. In wild canids the sabling is almost always black. In domestic breeds sabling is usually black, but can be blue or liver depending on recessive genes that surface from time to time in breeds such as shepherd dogs.
hm responds: November 17th, 2006 at 10:06 am
I’m up near Hayward Wisconsin and I have seen something resembling this twice in the past week during daylight hours. It was just running across the road both times and I had no idea what it was, but when I saw these photos I thought I would post a comment.
mystery_man responds: November 17th, 2006 at 11:26 am
Leave it to Kittenz to give a thorough, lucid, scientific explanation of things. Thanks for the info!
Laurie responds: November 20th, 2006 at 1:56 pm
I don’t have a clue about the poor, skinned animal. As for the illustration, it’s interesting how much it resembles the extinct Tasmanian tiger. While there are distinct differences in appearance - not to mention the tremendous geographical divide - well, just makes me wonder, is all. ‘Tis a strange world we live in, no?
xXHelenaHandbasketXx responds: November 20th, 2006 at 5:22 pm
Coy Dog. Coyotes breed with feral dogs out here and you get some pretty ugly critters. I’ve seen worse looking. And they are dangerous coz they don’t have the fear of man like a coyote does.
KSipesh responds: November 20th, 2006 at 10:58 pm
It would be interesting to have follow ups to these “mystery dog” creatures like this, to see how often those who handled the animals contracted sarcoptic mange, aka scabies from these infected, dead coyotes. It is highly contagious and it would give us a helpful stamp of validation on these cases.

And this is coming from a Registered Veterinary Technician who has seen plenty of canines in this state from said aliment so, take my opinion for what it is.

Leave your comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.

|Top | Content|

Cryptomundo
for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More

Ozark Mystery What-Is-It?

Random Posts

Spread the Word!

Random Posts

38 Responses to “Ozark Mystery What-Is-It?”

Leave your comments

Main Page

Join The Search

Mystery Pages

Login

Advertisement

Syndication

Donate Today

The Beyond

Advertisement

T 84 Viagra

taking viagra after the expiration date

cheap gerneric viagra

generic viagra levitra and cialis pills!

cheap gerneric viagra

cheap gerneric viagra

cheap gerneric viagra

Non Prescription Viagra

Viagra Illegal Phillipines

Side Affects Of Viagra

Buy Viagra Online At

taking viagra woman

Viagra And Cannabis

generic viagra levitra and cialis pills!

Viagra Bon Marche

taking viagra woman

Impotence Viagra

cheap gerneric viagra