Comments on: Oldest Footprint http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/oldest-footprint/ for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:30:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: robo http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/oldest-footprint/#comment-34084 robo Wed, 22 Aug 2007 06:38:00 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/oldest-footprint/#comment-34084 This is a known faked footprint from Texas. This is a known faked footprint from Texas.

]]> By: things-in-the-woods http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/oldest-footprint/#comment-34083 things-in-the-woods Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:53:20 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/oldest-footprint/#comment-34083 <p>assuming this photo is of the actual footprint, it does look quite sasquatchy (although the toes look kind of long- more ape-like than those that seem typical of BF casts). The real issues here are size and age. If it is of a 3+ million year old hominid (i.e., probably some kind of australopithecine) from africa it is likely to be quite small (do you have any info on measurements loren?). Of course, presumably no-one suggests that BF actually is an australopithecine (given their size and known distribution). As such, although interesting in its own right, it would be much more interesting with regards to BF to have footprints of, say, Homo erectus (or of giganto). This footprint only helps in a rather indirect way (i.e., showing that hominid creatures can have footprints that are roughly like those often reported for sas).</p> <p>great find though. </p> assuming this photo is of the actual footprint, it does look quite sasquatchy (although the toes look kind of long- more ape-like than those that seem typical of BF casts). The real issues here are size and age. If it is of a 3+ million year old hominid (i.e., probably some kind of australopithecine) from africa it is likely to be quite small (do you have any info on measurements loren?). Of course, presumably no-one suggests that BF actually is an australopithecine (given their size and known distribution). As such, although interesting in its own right, it would be much more interesting with regards to BF to have footprints of, say, Homo erectus (or of giganto). This footprint only helps in a rather indirect way (i.e., showing that hominid creatures can have footprints that are roughly like those often reported for sas).

great find though.

]]>