Comments on: October 20th: Patterson-Gimlin Footage Anniversary

By: Spikerama

Spikerama — Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:10:51 +0000

I am currently enjoying Loren’s “Bigfoot!” book. The chapter about Patterson-Gimlin is especially interesting. Here’s a few of my thoughts about it…

1. In the radio interview, Roger was asked about the palms of the hands, and he said he didn’t know what they looked like. In my opinion, if he had spent a bunch of time with a costume, he would have had an answer for the hands.

2. Roger said it made no sound. If I were seeking glory by using a faked bigfoot sighting, I would surely have added a low roar, etc, to the story.

By: terry the censor

terry the censor — Sun, 24 Oct 2010 04:40:25 +0000

> Buresh shares the following image

I feel like an idiot for not thinking of that.

By: red_pill_junkie

red_pill_junkie — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:23:13 +0000

So the real name of Patty is Atuk, eh?

By: DWA

DWA — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:28:38 +0000

Great. Just what we need. Another Beatles Legend.

Add to “when you play [x] backwards” and “Paul really IS dead” and “Klaatu were the Beatles” etc. that “Ringo was Patty!”

I must say, though. It certainly ties things up neatly. The similarities are stunning.