Comments on: New Track Photograph

By: civetcatman

civetcatman — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:12:40 +0000

I have some questions:

1. Is the Malaysian government officially backing the search for ‘Bigfoot’or is it being done by individuals?

2. If there were doubts on Ang and Chow’s abilities by other gov. bodies then why were they allowed to be ’spokesmen’ in the main media for so long?

3. How serious is Malaysia/Johor in finding the creature?

By: shumway10973

shumway10973 — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 07:10:32 +0000

I agree with jayman, a bear. Notice that there are actually 2 different types of prints, 1 set looks human-like, but the other looks typical for bear’s front paws. Hey, is that bones I see around the footprints? Looking at it again, I see only one for sure human-like print, the rest are bear and/or really bad prints.

By: mystic eyes

mystic eyes — Wed, 16 Aug 2006 06:49:59 +0000

I just compared the photo with some paw prints of the Malayan Sun Bear, Helarctos malayanus and the comparison strengthen our intuition that the JWPA’s shot merely feflectes prints of Sun Bear walking on their hind legs. Come on, JWPA if you are serious about your findings do us all a favour by being more professional, scientific and honest with your disclosures. JWPA needs to enlist some available expert help, I am sure many will be more than happy to lend a helping hand, if they have some acceptable proof rather a few poor shots of animal foot prints. Or else please stop all these attempts at cheap publicity. They should be aware that today’s general public and BF enthusiasts are smarter, well read, better informed and obviously not easily taken for a ride on this field of interest.

By: Bulat

Bulat — Wed, 16 Aug 2006 05:28:09 +0000

Where are the negatives? The photographer please come forward. The photographer should speak (the truth). Any Tom, Dick and Harry can fake footprints. Fresh/Photo evidences without concrete scientific proofs from a recognised scientist are as similar as fakes.

By: Peter Loh

Peter Loh — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:04:31 +0000

First impression…bear tracks.

By: mystic eyes

mystic eyes — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:46:04 +0000

Mnynames is right. Vincent’s earlier photos of BF are more acceptable and supposedly to be that of BF of Johor! The day of reckoning may come sooner or later and it is good there is no let-down by Vincent and his small band of of BF enthusiasts to continue their hunt for reality, perhaps, in the Johor wilderness. Let’s hope the truth will be unveiled soon.

So, here we are, waiting for something real, alive and kicking. Vincent’s passion for all things nature may reveal the mystery of the Johor BF soon.

By: Mnynames

Mnynames — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:56:19 +0000

You know, if any of this is even remotely true, I half-expect this Yap guy to come back from Australia and go, “What the …? I photocopied those pics for you because I thought they looked a lot like what was being reported. I never told you they were REAL!” Poor sap, that Yap…

By: Mnynames

Mnynames — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:53:25 +0000

These also look nothing like the casts of supposed tracks shown previously (By Chow, I think). You remember, the ones with the thumb-like big toes?

By: mystic eyes

mystic eyes — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:36:05 +0000

What bigfoot? Oh, no. Not from them again. Obviously another attempt to mislead us. The tracks are no more than some paw prints of sun bear or honey bear. A common sight in Malaysian jungles. Those guys need to brush up their reading on fauna of Malaysia. Pitiful bunch of ignorant Wildlife Protection Unit. Unless of course they have something more certain to share with us. Sorry folks, not this time we are not fooled.

By: dave61

dave61 — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 07:22:43 +0000

They are bear tracks. Who are these people trying to fool?! I’ve seen giant bipedal footprints in the Lukachukai Mountains of NE Arizona,of the Navajo Rez. These don’t even come close. Not fake, but wrong identifcation.