Comments on: Amazing Nebraska Cryptid Photo

By: bryanofadown

bryanofadown — Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:58:44 +0000

I’ve never seen a dog with toes. It’s a primate. Look closely at the feet. It has toes. And I think the outline is mistaken. The mouth opening in the outline isn’t the mouth. The animal appears to be looking down. I’d say, if it’s a cryptid, it could possibly be a devil monkey, which is a baboon like ape/primate said to inhabit the forests of North America and are known to be extremely aggressive and territorial. I looked at it pretty closely and it isn’t a dog. Why would someone bother with taking a picture of a stray dog anyway. I see stray dogs all of the time and never once felt the need to photograph one.

By: Faintwarrior

Faintwarrior — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 01:33:42 +0000

sorry… I THINK its a kind of monkey

By: Faintwarrior

Faintwarrior — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 01:31:14 +0000

I rhink its a kind of monkey, I never thought it was a dog or cat, always a monkey, maybe a baboon

By: CryptidHuntr

CryptidHuntr — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 01:16:08 +0000

It’s too bulky to be a cat. I say it looks like a…a….a….Hyena!!!!! That’s it. A hyena! Thanx Loren!!!!

By: Eveal1

Eveal1 — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:47:01 +0000

After reviewing the photo for a few minutes, I have come to the conclusion that the clipping of the photo is incorrect. THe near front leg is up taking a step with the far (right) front leg down along the window frame that “cuts” the photo. The coloration is interesting in that it has black socks and what I would assume to be a black muzzle. The range of the legs and the length of hair make it look very similar to a shaggy greyhound or even an Irish Wolfhound or Scottish Deerhound. THe trouble with this thought: the chest isn’t deep enough. Even a wolf, whose legs might be long enough doesn’t fit quite right, the chest is deeper on a wolf, I think.

By: Muggs

Muggs — Mon, 14 May 2007 00:10:51 +0000

Did anybody look behind the Creature in the back? It looks like there’s a little one.

Just thought I would say.

By: kittenz

kittenz — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:31:26 +0000

Hmm. I did not see this until now. It looks like the back end of a brindle Boxer dog. It looks to me like its head is turned to the right and down, and what some have taken to be a bent head is actually a raised left foreleg.

By: Rialle91

Rialle91 — Fri, 28 Jul 2006 17:55:56 +0000

Wrong part of the world, but the hindquarters and – is there some stripes there, or is that my eyes deceiving me? – remind me a little of a Tasmanian tiger… They’re ‘extinct’ in Tasmanian, so the idea is ridiculous… But that tail and springy lithe back legs… I wish you could see the head, because you can’t mistake the mouth on them! There’s loads of photographs of the T. Tigers if you want to look, but this sketch shows good leg/tail comparison. About the baboon comment, look at that primates rear… This animal’s isn’t so colourful. If you look at the T. Tiger’s feet, well… Maybe it’s a Nebraska Tiger *chuckle*

By: sasquatch

sasquatch — Thu, 22 Jun 2006 03:43:07 +0000

I saw a greyhound today that was colored exactly like this dog. And to the guy who says “the legs are too massive to be that of a dog”, What are you looking at? They are almost as skinny as the greyhounds that I saw today. there are a lot of greyhounds around where I live because folks started adopting them from the race track because they use to just kill ‘em when they got slow and the news publicized it. Greyhounds are bizarre looking so it may have startled the woman to see a tall lanky critter with stripped fur and a skinny pointy snout.

By: shadowparks

shadowparks — Wed, 21 Jun 2006 02:03:04 +0000

It looks like a pitbull to me. I have two of them. What appears to be the cat like head looks like a shadow.