<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Ancient Apes Discovered</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nakali-ape/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nakali-ape/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mystery_man</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nakali-ape/#comment-36700</link>
		<dc:creator>mystery_man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nakali-ape/#comment-36700</guid>
		<description>Interesting find, made even more so by the fact that researchers were from over in my neck of the woods, Japan. This certainly demonstrates that a lack of fossil evidence is not necessarily a highly compelling case against the existence of Bigfoot. Take a large enough area and add in the rarity of the fossilization process in general, and you will have a situation where you are far from having complete fossil records of all animals that have ever lived in a given area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting find, made even more so by the fact that researchers were from over in my neck of the woods, Japan. This certainly demonstrates that a lack of fossil evidence is not necessarily a highly compelling case against the existence of Bigfoot. Take a large enough area and add in the rarity of the fossilization process in general, and you will have a situation where you are far from having complete fossil records of all animals that have ever lived in a given area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ceroill</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nakali-ape/#comment-36699</link>
		<dc:creator>Ceroill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nakali-ape/#comment-36699</guid>
		<description>Hmm. That's a detail I had missed. I didn't realize that Dryopithecus was the same as Proconsul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. That&#8217;s a detail I had missed. I didn&#8217;t realize that Dryopithecus was the same as Proconsul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill green</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nakali-ape/#comment-36698</link>
		<dc:creator>bill green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nakali-ape/#comment-36698</guid>
		<description>this is a very interesting new article about 2 ancient apes discovered. thanks bill green</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is a very interesting new article about 2 ancient apes discovered. thanks bill green</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
