<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breaking News:  Nahuelito Photographed</title>
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nahuelito-pix/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  8 Aug 2008 00:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: youcantryreachingme</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nahuelito-pix/#comment-7440</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 04:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nahuelito-pix/#comment-7440</guid>
					<description>Redoubt (79) said "closed minds get lost easily in open spaces". Is that an original? Can I quote it? It would make a great email signature! :)

By the way - the original post mentioned three photographs, but we have only two. Loren - could you please clarify whether we can view the third photo, etc?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Redoubt (79) said &#8220;closed minds get lost easily in open spaces&#8221;. Is that an original? Can I quote it? It would make a great email signature! <img src='http://www.cryptomundo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>By the way - the original post mentioned three photographs, but we have only two. Loren - could you please clarify whether we can view the third photo, etc?</p>
<p>Thanks.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: shumway10973</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nahuelito-pix/#comment-7408</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 16:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nahuelito-pix/#comment-7408</guid>
					<description>I don't need other objects to see that these are fakes.  In the first one look at how close the water is to the camera and how small it is.  besides the facial feature remindes me of the jabberwocky.  the natural waves of the lake are bigger than anything around the creature. Something of its reported size would be causing wakes like a boat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t need other objects to see that these are fakes.  In the first one look at how close the water is to the camera and how small it is.  besides the facial feature remindes me of the jabberwocky.  the natural waves of the lake are bigger than anything around the creature. Something of its reported size would be causing wakes like a boat.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: josh W.</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nahuelito-pix/#comment-5314</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 00:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nahuelito-pix/#comment-5314</guid>
					<description>This photo is EXTREMELY sketchy. the water and the creature look like some kind of movie prop. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This photo is EXTREMELY sketchy. the water and the creature look like some kind of movie prop.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: john5</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nahuelito-pix/#comment-4219</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 05:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nahuelito-pix/#comment-4219</guid>
					<description>Thanks for your words Redoubt. I made a comment about sarcasm in a previous post as the topic of cryptozoology has long drawn sarcastic retorts from the very scientists (people) who should be involved in the serious research this interesting field requires. Jokes come easy but the proof takes work, effort and thought. Sadly Redoubt comments about these Nahualito pictures were largely from a sarcastic angle and without an obvious attention to the details provided (at least on my little computer screen).

I also apologize for a somewhat cranky attitude toward an abundance of humour based scoffing throughout this posting. One definitely needs a sense of humour to live a healthy life here on earth and to be involved in cryptozoology. To be able to laugh at one's self is another important trait to develop, especially if photos, etc of some rare animal or plant that are thought to be real turn out to be a fraud. No one wants to be the butt of a prank. This is why I debated a while before giving my opinion on these photos. What I see clearly in the first photo overrides any fear of it being a fraud.

Peace on the Path and Happy Sightings  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your words Redoubt. I made a comment about sarcasm in a previous post as the topic of cryptozoology has long drawn sarcastic retorts from the very scientists (people) who should be involved in the serious research this interesting field requires. Jokes come easy but the proof takes work, effort and thought. Sadly Redoubt comments about these Nahualito pictures were largely from a sarcastic angle and without an obvious attention to the details provided (at least on my little computer screen).</p>
<p>I also apologize for a somewhat cranky attitude toward an abundance of humour based scoffing throughout this posting. One definitely needs a sense of humour to live a healthy life here on earth and to be involved in cryptozoology. To be able to laugh at one&#8217;s self is another important trait to develop, especially if photos, etc of some rare animal or plant that are thought to be real turn out to be a fraud. No one wants to be the butt of a prank. This is why I debated a while before giving my opinion on these photos. What I see clearly in the first photo overrides any fear of it being a fraud.</p>
<p>Peace on the Path and Happy Sightings
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Redoubt</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nahuelito-pix/#comment-4173</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 16:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nahuelito-pix/#comment-4173</guid>
					<description>Actually, no sarcasm at all... just an attempt at some humor with my fellow posters here at the Crypto Board... and I really did share the photos with some outside acquaintances… I just took some liberties in retelling their stories. 

You know, it takes an open mind to even consider some of the subject matter here… and that is a good thing because closed minds get lost easily in open spaces. 

But at the same time, if we can’t laugh at ourselves and our subject matter just a little… well, then we just look like an asylum full of cranky eccentrics, is all. 

Anyway, if anyone was offended, I do apologize.

(Personally, I'm a big fan of Nessie and the variety of similarly strange critters worldwide.) 

-Redoubt
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, no sarcasm at all&#8230; just an attempt at some humor with my fellow posters here at the Crypto Board&#8230; and I really did share the photos with some outside acquaintances… I just took some liberties in retelling their stories. </p>
<p>You know, it takes an open mind to even consider some of the subject matter here… and that is a good thing because closed minds get lost easily in open spaces. </p>
<p>But at the same time, if we can’t laugh at ourselves and our subject matter just a little… well, then we just look like an asylum full of cranky eccentrics, is all. </p>
<p>Anyway, if anyone was offended, I do apologize.</p>
<p>(Personally, I&#8217;m a big fan of Nessie and the variety of similarly strange critters worldwide.) </p>
<p>-Redoubt
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: john5</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nahuelito-pix/#comment-4162</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 12:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nahuelito-pix/#comment-4162</guid>
					<description>Sarcasm does not make the pictures fake and simply calling them fake does not make them fake. There is far more detail in the first picture than in many other 'sea serpent' pictures and videos and yet there is surprisingly little mentioned about this fact. Maybe most people are too unnerved by the possible existence of the animals blinding them to any proof-positive detail in the photos. 
Peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarcasm does not make the pictures fake and simply calling them fake does not make them fake. There is far more detail in the first picture than in many other &#8217;sea serpent&#8217; pictures and videos and yet there is surprisingly little mentioned about this fact. Maybe most people are too unnerved by the possible existence of the animals blinding them to any proof-positive detail in the photos.<br />
Peace
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Redoubt</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nahuelito-pix/#comment-4151</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 02:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nahuelito-pix/#comment-4151</guid>
					<description>I suppose it could be a sea serpent… though the images are not like-sized and there is some good degree of variation in texture and lighting. My personal interpretation is that there is not enough resolution or consistency to form a firm opinion.

But just for fun, I thought I’d show them around some…

To help refine the process, I first took copies to an acquaintance at Bubba’s Transmission Repair and Barbecue… and he said they looked like jumper cables.

From there, I shared the photos with one of my son’s friends… his name is Lenny. He is a junior at the local high school and his impression was that it looked like an electric plug on the end of a cord.

Finally, I looked up an old buddy of mine from the 1960s. His name is Ratso… he used to be a junkie… until he got religion and now he’s a priest for the Church of the Divine Lady in the Mist, which has its headquarters in an old school bus just outside of Statesboro, Georgia. His main thing these days is growing mushrooms. He likes the pics and said he’s gonna do a blow up of them for Friday night services because whatever it is, they would probably look good under a black light.

I guess it’s all in the eye of the beholder…
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose it could be a sea serpent… though the images are not like-sized and there is some good degree of variation in texture and lighting. My personal interpretation is that there is not enough resolution or consistency to form a firm opinion.</p>
<p>But just for fun, I thought I’d show them around some…</p>
<p>To help refine the process, I first took copies to an acquaintance at Bubba’s Transmission Repair and Barbecue… and he said they looked like jumper cables.</p>
<p>From there, I shared the photos with one of my son’s friends… his name is Lenny. He is a junior at the local high school and his impression was that it looked like an electric plug on the end of a cord.</p>
<p>Finally, I looked up an old buddy of mine from the 1960s. His name is Ratso… he used to be a junkie… until he got religion and now he’s a priest for the Church of the Divine Lady in the Mist, which has its headquarters in an old school bus just outside of Statesboro, Georgia. His main thing these days is growing mushrooms. He likes the pics and said he’s gonna do a blow up of them for Friday night services because whatever it is, they would probably look good under a black light.</p>
<p>I guess it’s all in the eye of the beholder…
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: sasquatch</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nahuelito-pix/#comment-4149</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 01:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nahuelito-pix/#comment-4149</guid>
					<description>I haven't looked at these pictures in a few weeks and just now noticed that contrary to what some said about it being in the "exact" same position, just lower in the water; I'd have to disagree. It looks to me that the first hump is farther away from the camera than in the second picture. The second picture seems to have the first hump totally in line with the head/neck, while the first shot shows the first hump and head/neck not at all aligned as in a straight profile like the second. -hard to explain, but I'm starting to lean toward the REAL explanation on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t looked at these pictures in a few weeks and just now noticed that contrary to what some said about it being in the &#8220;exact&#8221; same position, just lower in the water; I&#8217;d have to disagree. It looks to me that the first hump is farther away from the camera than in the second picture. The second picture seems to have the first hump totally in line with the head/neck, while the first shot shows the first hump and head/neck not at all aligned as in a straight profile like the second. -hard to explain, but I&#8217;m starting to lean toward the REAL explanation on this.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Albert Mond</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nahuelito-pix/#comment-4128</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 19:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nahuelito-pix/#comment-4128</guid>
					<description>Interesting. Very interesting. Finally... SOME picture of it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Very interesting. Finally&#8230; SOME picture of it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: john5</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nahuelito-pix/#comment-4089</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 02:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/nahuelito-pix/#comment-4089</guid>
					<description>It is obvious that many negative comments on the photos of this animal are made by people who are not very familiar with the actions of water and dimensions of waves &#38; ripples. Having spent much time on and around rivers, Georgian Bay, Lake Erie and Huron, as well as the Gulf of Mexico I am very familiar with water motions and can plainly see that the ripples around the animal and in the background are not tiny (the animal is not a stick!.

There is a large long ripple that is running parallel several feet behind the animal in the first photo. This ripple must be at least 4-6 inches high, possibly a wake from a distance water craft!? The first hump would therefore measure ~2+ feet above the water. The curious ripple in the foreground of the picture suggests a location close to a shoreline given the irregularity. This would be a location where many other giant eel-like animals are frequently observed (landlubbards!). 

The foreground of the second picture showsa rather wide, shallow swell that runs parallel to the animal, almost as if the water here is gathering against a shoreline. The swell must be several feet across front to back to give a scale for the animal.

Does anyone else see in the first photo that the length of the animal is offset side to side like a snake that slithers side to side in a 2 dimension fashion. However unlike a snake this water animal appears to also use the third dimension of up and down as well as back and forth in its locomotion. Weaving itself through the surface of the water. It is the first picture capturing this historically typical view of a sea serpent and its bizarre locomotion that caught my immediate attention and appreciation.

There are more details in the pictures that speak of a real animal than any details that speak of a fabrication (see comments 52 &#38; 53). No one has found contridications with my previous posts and that in itself is of great interest.

Peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is obvious that many negative comments on the photos of this animal are made by people who are not very familiar with the actions of water and dimensions of waves &amp; ripples. Having spent much time on and around rivers, Georgian Bay, Lake Erie and Huron, as well as the Gulf of Mexico I am very familiar with water motions and can plainly see that the ripples around the animal and in the background are not tiny (the animal is not a stick!.</p>
<p>There is a large long ripple that is running parallel several feet behind the animal in the first photo. This ripple must be at least 4-6 inches high, possibly a wake from a distance water craft!? The first hump would therefore measure ~2+ feet above the water. The curious ripple in the foreground of the picture suggests a location close to a shoreline given the irregularity. This would be a location where many other giant eel-like animals are frequently observed (landlubbards!). </p>
<p>The foreground of the second picture showsa rather wide, shallow swell that runs parallel to the animal, almost as if the water here is gathering against a shoreline. The swell must be several feet across front to back to give a scale for the animal.</p>
<p>Does anyone else see in the first photo that the length of the animal is offset side to side like a snake that slithers side to side in a 2 dimension fashion. However unlike a snake this water animal appears to also use the third dimension of up and down as well as back and forth in its locomotion. Weaving itself through the surface of the water. It is the first picture capturing this historically typical view of a sea serpent and its bizarre locomotion that caught my immediate attention and appreciation.</p>
<p>There are more details in the pictures that speak of a real animal than any details that speak of a fabrication (see comments 52 &amp; 53). No one has found contridications with my previous posts and that in itself is of great interest.</p>
<p>Peace
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
