Comments on: New Mystery Loch Ness Photo

By: Johngbcdg

Johngbcdg — Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:15:14 +0000

In 2003 i took what i think is the best nessie head picture to come from lochness i took this on the underwater cam and this thing is easy to see it is right in your face it may well be in 3feet of water but make your mind up on this one anyone know what it is.
Link to picture on Noras site it is the one on the left i have the Original picture and will post it when i can.

http://www.geocities.com/nessie_hunter/Images/JohnNora.jpg

By: Johngbcdg

Johngbcdg — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:21:05 +0000

Here is a couple of links to footage from 2006.

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/326788/lochness_2006_nessie_footage/

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/326116/lochness_2002_nessie_footage/

By: bccryptid

bccryptid — Mon, 06 Nov 2006 20:34:47 +0000

If I close one eye, squint, and hold my breath, I can see, a wee fishee.

By: kittenz

kittenz — Mon, 06 Nov 2006 00:08:29 +0000

I kind of hate to say this, but these photos don’t look like underwater photos at all to me. They look like photos of a body of water, overhung by branches, shot through out-of-focus weeds.

By: richsd40

richsd40 — Sun, 05 Nov 2006 14:16:14 +0000

I agree with Dharkheart–the video cams at the Loch Ness website are pretty much useless. I check them out daily because I think they are interesting, but they are too far away from the water. If Nessie were to swim by Urquhart bay, you wouldn’t be able to tell what it was. And it has been stated that the cam theses pictures were from was placed in 3 feet of water–why bother? If Nessies are as big as we believe, what would 3 feet of water accomplish? I’ve heard for many years from the skeptics that if you convince yourself you’re gonna see a Nessie, you will. I do not believe that. I have spent 3 long weekends going around Lake Champlain hoping to see a sign of Champ and I saw nothing that I could even make myself think I saw it, and I believe in Champ! I want so badly to see Nessie in these pictures, but. The skeptics will say anything because they are sceptics!

By: captiannemo

captiannemo — Sat, 04 Nov 2006 23:04:10 +0000

I see alot of things in the picture that could be debris moving about by the curent.If there is anything other than organic matter drifting in the photo than my vote is eel.With the low visibility the minds eye can see almost anything.We see what we want to.

By: mystery_man

mystery_man — Sat, 04 Nov 2006 15:45:34 +0000

I’ll be honest, if someone were to just show me these pictures without any mention of Nessie, I would not think anything unusual was occurring here. That could be so many things that it is a bit rash to me to jump the gun and say this could be Nessie. It could be an animate object alright, but it isn’t clear that it is a living object. It could be an animate log drifting about or a whole lot of other mundane things. I don’t see any evidence here for even a sturgeon, let alone a large underwater cryptid in my opinion.

By: InvernessTours

InvernessTours — Sat, 04 Nov 2006 09:58:26 +0000

The underwater camera was positioned in about three feet of water (1 metre) beside a busy jetty.

It is possibly an eel, but this camera never could produce anything other than ambiguous images where it was located.

There are other pictures from this camera on my Loch-Ness.org in the Questions page for anyone who is interested.

By: stillserchin

stillserchin — Sat, 04 Nov 2006 09:49:17 +0000

It’s too indiscernible to make a clear cut picture of anything except for underwater plants. Is the Loch Ness webcam up and running again? It had been shut down for quite some time.

By: shovethenos

shovethenos — Sat, 04 Nov 2006 07:58:55 +0000

fuzzy-

Is that a caribbean or south american chupacabras?

everyone-

In all seriousness it is too blurry. If I had to guess I’d say eel.

VoiceOfReason-

The object is actually more in the center of the frame. Locate the bunch of vegetation in the center of the top picture. Then look directly to the left of the vegetation in the bottom picture. It’s sort of light brown.