Comments on: Newly Released Mt. Tam Bigfoot Video

By: klarsen1

klarsen1 — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:07:12 +0000

ok my turn…….

Created an account just to respond to this.

I live on Mt Tam, have all my 38 years, grew up traipsing all over the mountain and never seen this crap.

Also, note the frost/snow on the ground. Only happened about 5 times in the last 20 years or so, so the area in question is highly suspect, although the flora looks correct. I even think I know where this may have been shot, which is next to a parking area.

I gotta say you guys who think this is real need to realize there are a ton of people all over mt tam constantly, especially mtn bikers who go into very remote areas in this range (including me), and noone has ever reported a bigfoot. Believe me, someone would have seen something.

By: trkspt

trkspt — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 04:04:09 +0000

Ok, I have reviewed the footage and I agree that it does appear to be something in the first clip, but it could still be your eyes playing tricks on you. My issue is with his site as there is nothing there that I can find that even shows something is there. I guess I can just go take some video and then circle a bunch of areas and post it for everyone.

Would be more reliable if he just stuck to the one video. Most videos that appear to be real show movement, not one just standing like a broken tree stump. Again, interesting footage but the rest of his stuff cast some real doubt.

By: theSnark

theSnark — Fri, 29 Jun 2007 20:19:13 +0000

Well, it’s not a cat. But why would his first thought be ‘It’s a Sasquach’? I would think ‘it’s either an oddly shaped stump with leaves creating the movement, or some creep was following me(us.)’

And if it was, as he said, the return film, why is the camera tilted when he is clearly not on a hill?

By: Billy240z

Billy240z — Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:11:33 +0000

Hi I am the one who filmed this footage. on the day i was filming it it was near the end of my day out there and I was very tired I recently had knee surgery and was doing what My Doctor said get some exercise. There is a good 1 1/2 hour on the tape from this day so if there is a real professional out there who would like to go threw this with me be my guest I don’t want to waist my time with wannabees professional .
As i see we have people who think they are which is a good laugh to me to.
here is a link to some more of my work with still shots from the films I have done
http://billy240z.wetpaint.com/page/Home
I hope it OK to Post my link ? I will soon find out.
Back to the footage in question as i was saying there is a lot more to it. As any one know ( if you ever have film any Crypt’s that is ) It’s not easy and never perfect.I remember walking this area very well I just wanted to put the camcorder on my back and go home I learn a long time ago never turn off my camcorder so I did not I left it on I stop just briefly because I did feel something in that area look for a few seconds then carry on yes there is more film after this scene . I don.t intend to break it out unless the right person steps up. Have fun and never turn of your camcorders folks you may just get something !

By: Hawkeye

Hawkeye — Fri, 29 Jun 2007 06:33:50 +0000

This reminds me of an Ohio researcher Dallas Gilbert who posts all kinds of pictures saything there he is can’t you see him.

By: YourPTR!

YourPTR! — Fri, 29 Jun 2007 03:33:34 +0000

I cant’ see anything at all. The screen capture underneath is interesting though.

By: Rillo777

Rillo777 — Fri, 29 Jun 2007 02:46:10 +0000

So, if I understand correctly, this guy was out with his kid and thought there might be a big cat around, so he turns on his camcorder, holds it quietly in a tilted, artsy sort of way, and TRIES TO CREEP UP ON THE CAT!!? Sorry, don’t buy that. Then he implies he didn’t notice the bigfoot, or rather thought it was a cat? Don’t buy that either.

By: halcyonicWV

halcyonicWV — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:34:43 +0000

Hoax. The still in particular. Light on the face is contrary to everything else. Also, placement is absurd, is he inside a stump peeking out? Check out the blurry detail and the flora over which the face and shoulders hover.

This fake would’ve been better done showing the subject peering from behind a tree, rather than have the torso melt into what appears to be a large stump, or worse, a partially deleted/obscured living tree.

In the video, I see only 2 possible sasquatch, the obvious “stander” generally near the middle for most of the video, and deeper to the right, movement, apparently head and partial torso. Where are these other two? Bigfoot seemed apparently at ease, just standing there, with very little head movement even. Why were the others hiding if big daddy sensed no problem? Actually, the obvious squatch in the vid looked like a chewbacca costume.

Anyhow, the pic is definitely fake. The video, let me say I’m 99% sure it’s fake.

By: mantis

mantis — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:28:12 +0000

%!!*#
Ahrr! I can’t believe I just stared that long into my monitor before I read the comments!

By: chabuhi

chabuhi — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:15:57 +0000

Not defending any of the videos, but just pointing out that a video camera that is zoomed in can give an extremely shaky image, whether you’re filming BF or filming a UFO or filming your kid’s football game.

Again, that’s not meant as an endorsement of this (or any other) video, but shaky camera work is not, in itself, damning evidence.