Comments on: Update: Mt. Hood Bigfoot?

By: ElizabethH

ElizabethH — Mon, 11 Sep 2006 09:39:44 +0000

I am new here, but noticed something right away about the photo. This “hump” is a muscle of a forearm, and there appears to be a lot of hair. The upper part of this portion, is the elbow. How high up was this camera? I am assuming that if it was high enough for a deer to peek in on it, a slightly lower than eye level for the deer, then that might be about 4 feet? Maybe if this is so then whatever’s elbow and forearm muscle is showing is about halfway up so this “thing” might have been about 6 to 7.5 feet? Just a common sense observation, but I saw the picture and right away knew I was looking at a forearm.

By: JacinB

JacinB — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 16:27:16 +0000

I’m not entirely certain, but I think some of you are looking a little too hard for a non-human explanation for the original photo.

When I look at it, I see the back of a woman’s head, as if she were looking down the game trail after re-positioning the camera.

She’s got shorter bangs in the front (which are visible near the top of what would be her head), and the hair is even curled under slighting (as if with a curling iron) all along its edges.

For all we know, it could be the wife of the gentleman who originally submitted the photos … any word on what her hair color is?

By: mbryant

mbryant — Fri, 12 May 2006 17:26:22 +0000

oops…addendum…the ‘ear’is on the right side of the photo,and would be the left side of the horses face…

By: mbryant

mbryant — Fri, 12 May 2006 17:24:44 +0000

Looking at this photo again…I have horses and I really think it looks like a close up of a horses face ‘nosing’ the camera. I think I see a portion of ear on the upper left side of the photo,(would be the horses right side) the horses nose, and the hair looks just like the forelock of a horse. I wondered about the little bump on the right side of the picture, but have decided that it might be a sticking- out piece of a bridle.If it’s a bigfoot, he uses a de-tangler…

By: traveler

traveler — Fri, 12 May 2006 01:21:57 +0000

hmmm..sorry but i am not seeing a moved stick. I am seeing a color difference in one of them that i think is due to shadow differences, but not really moved stick…..maybe if u could clarify what stick u are talking about other then on the right? maybe in relation to the logs?

By: Barkster

Barkster — Thu, 11 May 2006 12:38:03 +0000

Wow!!! That picture is a tricky one. Because At first I thought it was the hairy guy from the Adam’s family that never got his hair cut. If you say it’s a bigfoot, then why does it seems the hair is straight and look well comb??? I thought bigfoot most likely have messy hair. But if you want to know my real thought. This image or creature shows a little flab and it perhaps a lost Orang-utan. The color of the hair is well fit. I probably match a similar image to the women that reported a skunkape that was behind her yard a night that took very close up image that was very like orang-utan but it had more of a fang and it was more upright.

I would like to see this location or camera to be adjusted more, perhaps 15 feet on the tree and tilt town downward. This camera seems like it’s 3 or 4 feet above the ground level. There are hunting tool that is like a chair that you can climb tree with and to sit on this chair. Order it and sit there for a while and place 1 or 2 cam in different angle that would monitor the surface below.

By: surendipity

surendipity — Thu, 11 May 2006 07:43:16 +0000

Why is the first pic of bigfoot zoomed in? The other pics except for the deer face contain more background.

The deer are headed away from the camera, Which one may think they came in from the left of the pic. Possibly jumping in from the bushes, thus the vertical streaks.

They also show up calmly, and unalerted, even though five minutes earlier bigfoot was present, wouldn’t they have smelled something amiss and left the scene?

I believe it is the white tail of a deers butt as it leaps into the opening of the forest.

Also, the forest floor is very undisturbed. There are thin tall stems sprouting close to the camera which are undisturbed in all photos. Untrampled greenery.

Unless one where to see more photos, which there must be. The mystery so far looks like a deers hiney.

Also if you were bigfoot you know it’s a big taboo to be captured on film. Maybe he/she was trying to turn shut the camera off. Not only that, but look at the hight it is set at, the highth of a small fawn. Around 4′ 6′

If you want to find a giant, don’t you have to look a little higher. Why wasn’t the camera up in a tree on a fish lense scaning the whole area.

Strange how research is carried out.

By: CRYPTOHABIT

CRYPTOHABIT — Wed, 10 May 2006 20:20:51 +0000

traveler,
There actually is a stick at the base of the tree at right which is not broken but in a different position. At first I thought that the pictures were out of order because in the first picture, the stick is sort of squashed down and in the second picture it is popped up again. Then I thought someone could have kicked it or stepped next to it and another stick popped it up. Anyway, if you get the pictures to overlay perfectly then flip back at forth I think you should at least see the stick.

By: traveler

traveler — Wed, 10 May 2006 17:48:16 +0000

hmmm not seeing the prints….I actually saw very little disturbance at all in the ground cover. I was looking for broken sticks or anything like that that might indicate passage, but was unable to identify any. Only thing I noticed was that there was dew on the ground in the first pic, and not in the others.

*side note* i am getting some lorens a-z book from the library. they had it in the childrens nonfiction area. Is it really considered a childs book? I guess its a good thing that at least its considered nonfiction

By: CRYPTOHABIT

CRYPTOHABIT — Wed, 10 May 2006 16:02:08 +0000

OK I havn’t seen this posted yet so here it goes.
Open the photo of big hairy and the following one showing the three deer moving away from the camera with windows picture/fax viewer. Now flip rapidly between picures like a flip book. At the bottom of the pictures, notice the areas where the ground is disturbed. I believe these are foot prints. Foot prints of what, I don’t know, but they don’t look like hoof prints. It appears to me that there are three distinct prints from the bottom left to the right as if whatever is in the first pic walked away from the camera and behind the tree on the right. That is unless there is a delay and the camera was tripped whe the subject came from behind the tree on the right, but did not snap the photo until the subject was right next to the camera.