Posted by: Loren Coleman on November 17th, 2007
Here is a new short video analysis of the photographs of the Jacobs mangy bear. Of course, despite my opinion that might seem to agree with the conclusions of this video, the point must be made that most of the “Bigfoot” used on the following video for comparative reasons are fakes, hoaxes, people in suits, and such.
I suppose this entire episode (but not this video) will be remembered as a moment in history, someday, and a clever way for the BRFO (sic) to obtain some visits to their site. Moving on.
This entry was posted
on Saturday, November 17th, 2007 at 6:25 pm and is filed under CryptoZoo News, Breaking News, Forensic Science, Reviews, Cryptotourism, Cryptozoologists, Evidence, Cryptozoology, Bigfoot, Sasquatch, Public Forum, Pop Culture, Hoaxes, Videos, Photos. You can follow responses via our RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is not allowed.
del.icio.us Digg Furl Reddit Ma.gnolia StumbleUpon Technorati Yahoo! Help
- Similar Phenomena:
- Créature de Jacobs »
- Jacobs Mischief Continues »
- Jacobs Bear Superimposition »
- MSNBC Video on Jacobs’ Creature »
- When A Mangy Bear Is Just A Mangy Bear »
- Jacobs’ Creature: A Bonobo? »
very interesting new youtube video clip about the jacobs photos & very interesting article about the jacobs photos as well. thanks bill green
I get a slight feeling that the people behind the BFRO are not too concerned about their reputation. They just threw out the pictures and their theories on the webpage without examine and investigate it properly. Any serious scientist WILL NOT publish anything without evidence to prove that his/her theory is accurate. To find and publish evidence for the existence of an unknown animal is not easy and people will analyse everything over and over to show the opposite of anything. How ever, it is a healthy symbiosis that the two camps, believers and nonbelievers look after each other. As well, we must not forget that the hardest work is for the believer. It is not very hard to not believe in something that is not proved to exist. Or is it so easy to believe?
Cheers
Its quite sad that an organization like the BFRO will claim something is a Bigfoot before truly analyzing all the facts and pictures taken.
Even my 12 year old daughter knew that was a bear.
LOL, that film clip is Hilarious!
This is a bear, this is a bigfoot (truck) CLASSIC
hahaha good one
When i watched that video i laughed so hard tears came to my eyes!
That was GREAT!
hahaha thats hilarious and has more analysis then the bfro video
i like the bfro video its replying to
the greatest findings and only compeling info thier video shows is the arrows marked ‘boy parts’
the zoomed face looks like an ink blot test which is how they can beleive its anything other then poor lil mangy bear
That video was very funny. Thanks for the heads up.
As for mange, I have seen a few creatures with mange through the years and the tail is always much, much smaller than it would look if it was furry (which makes sense considering the tail is mostly fur). So, in this video, we would have a very small stub of a tail and really poor contrast. No way to tell conclusively if there is an appendage there or not, IMHO. I’d bet there is, unless the poor bear rubbed it off scratching his rump on a tree.
TOOO FUNNY, I hope this puts this whole silly thing to files once and for all. By files I mean the ones that go out to the curb in large cans!!!!! I can’t understand how this went on as long as it did. BRFO…perfect re-spell, …Well done!!
that would be the round filing cabinet? lol
for hits on thier website this worked perfectly
as for any scrap of believability in thier research ability and opinions ….
if they told me the time id go else where to check it
Oh, I knew the bigfoot shots weren’t credible. I’m not ignorant. I didn’t spend four years at Atlantis Medical School and not pick up a few things.
But thanks for linking to my video. I have much more respect for the credibility of Loren’s work than Mr. Moneymaker’s. I think the whole Sonoma incident really destroyed much of their credibility. Yet I still see and hear them on FOX NEWS all the time…
Excellent. Hilarious. A real hoot. The theme song from “Pee Wee’s Big Adventure” was frosting on the cake. Winnie the Pooh sees Patty in the mirror…priceless.
Jeff Meldrum and George Noory were discussing this last night from the perspective of anatomical biology. Meldrum was very articulate explaining why it was almost certainly a bear and not a bigfoot. They were both pretty concerned by reports that there were several other photos from that trail cam that were being purposefully withheld. What timing to see this video!
Frankly, I agree with this video, the question probably will not be settled until a body is produced. But in the meantime can anyone at BFRO ever be taken seriously for anything ever again? Does anyone with FOX News feel like they’ve been taken for a little ride? Do any of the key players or reporters in this episode feel a little remorseful or sheepish or just plain silly…even a little bit?
That bear should be getting royalties from all this exposure. It needs an agent.
This was one of the funnies things I had seen in awhile.
OK, is this whole Jacobs thing giving anyone else nightmares?
mystery_man responds:
November 19th, 2007 at 3:22 am
That bear should be getting royalties from all this exposure. It needs an agent.
Most definitely needs an agent. I’m just wondering when the Hollywood movie is going to be released. I can see the title now. Jacobs Mountian, The True Story Of The Juvenile Sasquatch!
Man, the reason there aren’t more pictures (or even videos) of ol’ Jacobs the Mangy Bear is because his writers are on strike. His agent is advising him not to cross the picket lines… for P.R. reasons.
come on guys, thats a “mangie” “skinny” black bear, are the BRFO high?