No “Bigfeet” Discovered

Posted by: Loren Coleman on April 15th, 2008

It is good to know that the legacy of Cryptomundo is assisting the literary world of Oregon’s Portland Mercury.

Courtney Ferguson writes today about his search for whether “Bigfeet” is the correct word to use:

After spending 10 minutes searching for the proper plural form of Sasquatch, I grew impatient. Was it Sasquatches? Could I use Bigfeet? Or was it a murder of Sasquatch? Finding little in the way of information on the New York Times site (two instances of Sasquatches) and absolutely nothing in the Chicago Manual of Style, I encountered this cryptid site!

cryptomundo.com

Eureka!

Within cryptozoology, North American hominoid cryptids typically follow the same irregular plural rule as the above animal words, including:
Bigfoot – Bigfoot
Sasquatch – Sasquatch

There are other cryptid names that also follow this pattern, such as:

Mothman – Mothman
Nessie – Nessie

This is definitely a point that Bigfoot should have covered in his excellent book, Me Write Book: It Bigfoot Memoir.

Bigfoot Memoir

Similar Phenomena:

2 Responses to “No “Bigfeet” Discovered”

  1. eireman responds:

    I, too, prefer the singular is the same as plural approach; it’s almost a collective noun.

  2. dougall3 responds:

    I’ve read this book and another one by the same fellow–they are hilarious! A must read!



Leave your comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.

|Top | Content|


Donate Today

Advertisers

The Original Bigfoot Watch

Advertisement







|Top | FarBar|



Attention: This is the end of the usable page!
The images below are preloaded standbys only.
This is helpful to those with slower Internet connections.