<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Momo On Travel Channel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/momo-travch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/momo-travch/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Lake Monsters, Sea Serpents and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 01:24:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/momo-travch/comment-page-1/#comment-76167</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=49849#comment-76167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would tend to see this as a media attempt to generalize and expand the use of Momo. The more specific use, yes, is for the River Road and Louisiana, MO, cases of 1971-1972, only.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would tend to see this as a media attempt to generalize and expand the use of Momo. The more specific use, yes, is for the River Road and Louisiana, MO, cases of 1971-1972, only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mosas</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/momo-travch/comment-page-1/#comment-76142</link>
		<dc:creator>mosas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=49849#comment-76142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having been part of the Bigfoot research community in Missouri for years, and desiring to defend and preserve the purity of the Bigfoot cultural history here in Missouri, I&#039;m compelled to point out that the Missouri version of Bigfoot is rarely called &quot;Momo&quot; (and never in the Ozarks region) unless it is by a detached member of the media who’s abandoned  journalistic due diligence or by a native of the Northern Missouri river towns from which the name &quot;Momo&quot; originated in the 70&#039;s (i.e. Louisiana, Missouri). In the numerous witness interviews I&#039;ve conducted, I recall just one Missourian mentioning the name &quot;Momo&quot; and it was not in connection with any local lure but in reference to a media news story. 

I have a personal dislike for the moniker &quot;Momo&quot; (short for &quot;Missouri Monster&quot;) because it unscientifically connotes the concept of a mythical monster rather than a living breathing North American primate. I also dislike when the name is used (inaccurately) as a catch-all for any Missouri Bigfoot type creature rather than the geographic and era specific creature form which it received its birth. I suppose the same criticism could be lodged against the use of the word &quot;Bigfoot&quot; too. Like so much of Bigfoot reality television programing, producers are eager to promote the sensational at the expense of accuracy and &quot;Legend of the Ozarks&quot; appears to have also fallen into that common production trap.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been part of the Bigfoot research community in Missouri for years, and desiring to defend and preserve the purity of the Bigfoot cultural history here in Missouri, I&#8217;m compelled to point out that the Missouri version of Bigfoot is rarely called &#8220;Momo&#8221; (and never in the Ozarks region) unless it is by a detached member of the media who’s abandoned  journalistic due diligence or by a native of the Northern Missouri river towns from which the name &#8220;Momo&#8221; originated in the 70&#8242;s (i.e. Louisiana, Missouri). In the numerous witness interviews I&#8217;ve conducted, I recall just one Missourian mentioning the name &#8220;Momo&#8221; and it was not in connection with any local lure but in reference to a media news story. </p>
<p>I have a personal dislike for the moniker &#8220;Momo&#8221; (short for &#8220;Missouri Monster&#8221;) because it unscientifically connotes the concept of a mythical monster rather than a living breathing North American primate. I also dislike when the name is used (inaccurately) as a catch-all for any Missouri Bigfoot type creature rather than the geographic and era specific creature form which it received its birth. I suppose the same criticism could be lodged against the use of the word &#8220;Bigfoot&#8221; too. Like so much of Bigfoot reality television programing, producers are eager to promote the sensational at the expense of accuracy and &#8220;Legend of the Ozarks&#8221; appears to have also fallen into that common production trap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk
Database Caching 28/40 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk

 Served from: www.cryptomundo.com @ 2013-06-18 01:32:19 by W3 Total Cache -->