<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Minnesota Mystery Track</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/mn-myst-trk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/mn-myst-trk/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: BunniesLair</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/mn-myst-trk/#comment-47223</link>
		<dc:creator>BunniesLair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 02:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=4456#comment-47223</guid>
		<description>Montauk Monster, with mange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Montauk Monster, with mange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kentmcmanigal</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/mn-myst-trk/#comment-47201</link>
		<dc:creator>kentmcmanigal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=4456#comment-47201</guid>
		<description>Beaver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beaver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lupus78</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/mn-myst-trk/#comment-47187</link>
		<dc:creator>Lupus78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=4456#comment-47187</guid>
		<description>Looks like it has three 'toes'... Could it be the Fouke monster? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like it has three &#8216;toes&#8217;&#8230; Could it be the Fouke monster? <img src='http://www.cryptomundo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: red_pill_junkie</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/mn-myst-trk/#comment-47182</link>
		<dc:creator>red_pill_junkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 01:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=4456#comment-47182</guid>
		<description>Maybe it was a &lt;i&gt;Narnian&lt;/i&gt; beaver ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it was a <i>Narnian</i> beaver <img src='http://www.cryptomundo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maslo63</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/mn-myst-trk/#comment-47179</link>
		<dc:creator>maslo63</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=4456#comment-47179</guid>
		<description>A giant beaver? Seriously people come on! Its a Castor canadensis track. I have seen several of these and its a spot on match. Unless all the tracks I have seen are in reality from giant beavers and all the beavers I've seen are just baby giant beavers. Lets keep an open mind people. Ya never know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A giant beaver? Seriously people come on! Its a Castor canadensis track. I have seen several of these and its a spot on match. Unless all the tracks I have seen are in reality from giant beavers and all the beavers I&#8217;ve seen are just baby giant beavers. Lets keep an open mind people. Ya never know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiteriverfisherman</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/mn-myst-trk/#comment-47173</link>
		<dc:creator>whiteriverfisherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=4456#comment-47173</guid>
		<description>That is one perfect example of a simple beaver track (back foot).  No doubt about it.  Beavers can get to be darn big critters.  Much bigger than most folks realize.  I find it hard to believe that wildlife and fisheries people said “there is not a native species that leaves a track like this”.  I am pretty sure the beaver is a native species in Minnesota.  No mystery here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is one perfect example of a simple beaver track (back foot).  No doubt about it.  Beavers can get to be darn big critters.  Much bigger than most folks realize.  I find it hard to believe that wildlife and fisheries people said “there is not a native species that leaves a track like this”.  I am pretty sure the beaver is a native species in Minnesota.  No mystery here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sschaper</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/mn-myst-trk/#comment-47170</link>
		<dc:creator>sschaper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=4456#comment-47170</guid>
		<description>Can a large waterfowl step almost in the same spot, giving the illusion of 5 toes? 

Castoroides ohioensis is supposed to have died out 10,000 years ago, but the Mic'mac and other locals feature them in their tales. From what little we know about pre-Columbian American history, it is unlikely that they were there continuously for 10,000 years, which suggests that maybe the most recent fossils that we've found might be that old, but that remnant populations may have continued to survive - we often talk here about how our eyes don't do a real good job of figuring the size of an animal or bird at a distance, and when something looks very much like something we already know - say beaver or muskrat - then we tend to think that is what it is. So it is just possible, maybe.  

If I were a grad student on break, I'd head up there, and look around the surrounding area for very large lodges, like the one they found buried in a peat bog in Ohio, as well as more tracks. That could make a career.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can a large waterfowl step almost in the same spot, giving the illusion of 5 toes? </p>
<p>Castoroides ohioensis is supposed to have died out 10,000 years ago, but the Mic&#8217;mac and other locals feature them in their tales. From what little we know about pre-Columbian American history, it is unlikely that they were there continuously for 10,000 years, which suggests that maybe the most recent fossils that we&#8217;ve found might be that old, but that remnant populations may have continued to survive - we often talk here about how our eyes don&#8217;t do a real good job of figuring the size of an animal or bird at a distance, and when something looks very much like something we already know - say beaver or muskrat - then we tend to think that is what it is. So it is just possible, maybe.  </p>
<p>If I were a grad student on break, I&#8217;d head up there, and look around the surrounding area for very large lodges, like the one they found buried in a peat bog in Ohio, as well as more tracks. That could make a career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bearcat</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/mn-myst-trk/#comment-47169</link>
		<dc:creator>Bearcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=4456#comment-47169</guid>
		<description>Could it be the "Wisconsin Werewolf?"  (or Manwolf)   Has Linda Godfrey visited this site to look at these tracks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it be the &#8220;Wisconsin Werewolf?&#8221;  (or Manwolf)   Has Linda Godfrey visited this site to look at these tracks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mosas</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/mn-myst-trk/#comment-47160</link>
		<dc:creator>mosas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=4456#comment-47160</guid>
		<description>Can't we for once just set aside the usual cryptid speculation and get real. This is clearly a man in a ape suit dressed as a moose in a beaver costume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t we for once just set aside the usual cryptid speculation and get real. This is clearly a man in a ape suit dressed as a moose in a beaver costume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: outdoorsman43</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/mn-myst-trk/#comment-47155</link>
		<dc:creator>outdoorsman43</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=4456#comment-47155</guid>
		<description>This is not any type of large waterfowl as all have consistant 3 toes not 5. Kitsos and hunter21, I think that both of you are onto something. In all of the beaver tracks I have seen, none have been heel heavy like this one or to the depth of this one, 100% of all I have seen have been toe heavy tracks. I do think the depth indicates a very large animal. The web span of this print seems to equal to that of it's length, which is not consistant to that of a beaver web span of 3-4 inches. Also noted that in LeCopes link, there is a gradual incline from the heel to the 1st web toe, in these photos, it's abruptly outward, another inconsistancy. I would tend to agree with hunter21 that although it's "beaver like", it's not as well in many aspects. I do think it's possible that sschaper might be right about the giant beaver and if not it might be an unknown relative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not any type of large waterfowl as all have consistant 3 toes not 5. Kitsos and hunter21, I think that both of you are onto something. In all of the beaver tracks I have seen, none have been heel heavy like this one or to the depth of this one, 100% of all I have seen have been toe heavy tracks. I do think the depth indicates a very large animal. The web span of this print seems to equal to that of it&#8217;s length, which is not consistant to that of a beaver web span of 3-4 inches. Also noted that in LeCopes link, there is a gradual incline from the heel to the 1st web toe, in these photos, it&#8217;s abruptly outward, another inconsistancy. I would tend to agree with hunter21 that although it&#8217;s &#8220;beaver like&#8221;, it&#8217;s not as well in many aspects. I do think it&#8217;s possible that sschaper might be right about the giant beaver and if not it might be an unknown relative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
