Comments on: Mitt Romney Loses Bigfoot Vote

By: MogollonMonster

MogollonMonster — Sun, 22 Jan 2012 11:18:20 +0000

Mitt stuck his Big Foot in his Big Mouth!

Bigfoot has seen many newts. However, he does not believe that a living, breathing mitt really exists.

By: Hapa

Hapa — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:05:26 +0000

Fred123

Oh okay. Didn’t catch Jrobojock’s statement: so many written here that I don’t have time to read them all.

I’ve never heard either of a death decree for Christ being found, but that doesn’t hamper my faith. Don’t need it to prove it in my heart. There is however a large amount of lit in Christian Apologetics that talks about the historicity of Christ and other Biblical events. Case for Christ and a few others come to mind.

Getting back to the issue at hand: I still think not voting for someone just because they call Sasquatch a hoax is not only wrong, but morally wrong; you must decide based on your political views, religious views (if you have any), and where you heart sets your course, when deciding on who to vote for. You shouldn’t make those decisions based on political canidates beliefs about cryptids. Its a hollow reason I think for not voting for particular canidates. Besides Romney was making a joke and, though I don’t agree with the joke’s premise, I did find it kinda funny. Having said that, based on what he has said, I feel I would rather vote for the Loch Ness Monster than Romney, and the Loch Ness Monster is not even American!

By: Fred123

Fred123 — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:04:27 +0000

Hapa,
I think that you’re replying to the wrong guy. I know how likely it is that records like these would have survived, especially considering the fact that the Romans nearly wiped Jerusalum off the map doring the great revolt that happened around 70 AD, and did a pretty good job of it when put down the Simon bar Kochba revolt a few decades later. I also know that if anybody discovered these papers it would have been a major story, and that anybody who was even remotely interested in the subject would have heard of it. Jrobojock is the guy who claimed that these papers have been recovered.

By: Hapa

Hapa — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:25:27 +0000

Fred123:

‘I have been unable to find anything suggesting that ” notable archeological expedition” (Or anybody else for that matter) have discovered Jesus death decree,’

You assume that every single written document from the ancient Levant, 2000 years ago, survived? You assume they would survive the ravages of time, wars (such as the 1st and 2nd Jewish revolts, which saw Fires and bloodletting out the wazoo) and natural disasters? And where is evidence that they had written death decrees, or that all of them, or almost all, have survived to the present era?

By: Lack of Evidence

Lack of Evidence — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:46:01 +0000

To all those who complain about that there are only fuzzy and blurry bigfoot pictures….Mitch Hedburg had it figured out when he joked that maybe bigfoot itself is just blurry. A big blurry monster walking through the woods, and even a high quality camera can’t take a good picture because the monster is just damn blurry.

To the poster who said something about Dr. Meldrum’s analysis or something like that….Whatever his analysis is, it isn’t proof that it exists. I hate to keep saying it, but there is no proof. There is sketchy evidence at best, a long line of hoaxes, but no proof and that’s the bottom line. Hit back if you would like, but studies from scientists don’t mean squat. Dr. Meldrum is just like many of the others in this field. They want it to exist so much that they find a way to make it real.

By: Fred123

Fred123 — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 05:13:36 +0000

Introducing both politics and religion on the same post probably wasn’t the best move if Loren wanted to keep this page focused on cryptids. After the second reading of his post, I was pretty sure that his suggesting that anybody could foolish enough to consider a politician’s stance on bigfoot and his jab at Romney’s religion were both meant to be jokes (although I seem to wrong thinking that nobody would take the “if he don’t believe in Squatch, I sure ain’t votin’” for him position. One thing is certain, both religion and cryptozoology have had more than their share of hoaxes, and phony pieces of the “True Cross” were floating around the Roman Empire’s eastern provinces thousands of years before people were stuffing bigfoot costumes and road kill into their freezers. I hope this site get’s back to it’s roots soon, there are plenty of other places on the internet to discuss religion.

By: Fred123

Fred123 — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 03:51:08 +0000

I’ve been unable to find anything suggesting that “a notable archeological expedition” (or anybody else for that matter) has discovered Jesus’ death decree, even at the websites that are most dedicated to “proving” things that they claim need no proof. Such a document, if it existed would be as easy to find on the internet as an indisputable picture of a dead bigfoot would be if one existed. It’s interesting that many people are willing to denounce some hoaxes while perpetuating others.

By: Chalupacabra

Chalupacabra — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:47:34 +0000

Hey wait a minute. Mormons are taught that Bigfoot is Cain, cursed to walk the earth for killing his brother Abel. Don’t believe me? Google it or click here:

http://mormonmatters.org/2008/01/23/bigfoot-the-three-nephites-and-the-lost-tribes-of-israel/

By: shownuff

shownuff — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:41:33 +0000

Lost my vote I am switching to Ron Paul. Actually is Bigfoot running Independent? ( get it? ) .

By: somebodyssquatchingme

somebodyssquatchingme — Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:32:20 +0000

My beliefs:

God = 100% (not the Hollywood version)

Bigfoot = 98% (Lack of Evidence should change his name to Lack of Studying Dr. Meldrum’s Analysis)

Honest Politicians = 50% (probably too generous)

Honest Mitt Romney = 2%

My Taxes Will Go Down = 0%