Comments on: First Full Facial Footage of Bigfoot? UPDATE

By: stickyum

stickyum — Wed, 18 May 2011 21:04:51 +0000

Hmm, I was just thinking, hopefully this new Bigfoot film footage from Adrian Erickson, when it’s finally released to the world media, is not another example of a “Bubblegum-Crypto-Hoax” like the infamous Hoax from Georgia. Six years is a long time to be “sitting-on-your-butt” Adrian and not releasing your Definitive-Bombshell-Film Proof of the existence of Bigfoot to the scientific community and the public-at-large. Frankly, Adrian I’m not “Holding-My-Breath”!

By: arletty

arletty — Sun, 10 Apr 2011 02:45:29 +0000

Regarding the painting of the Sasquach, multimedia…I am the artist that created this piece. It is was an original image; my own visionary likeness of a Sasquatch; without any photos or other pieces of art (masks, etc) It seems that some comments were assuming that I copied the features of it. Actually, this is my very own creation, from my imagination. I just wanted to make it clear to anyone that has questioned this. Please feel free to send messages, as I’d be more than happy to answer.

Arlet de Visser

By: squatchesque

squatchesque — Wed, 09 Mar 2011 02:45:49 +0000

To me a better title for the video might be top ten blob-squatch sightings. Except for the Patterson video, everything was extremely suspect to me just based on what can be seen. Not at all hopeful about this.

By: terry the censor

terry the censor — Mon, 07 Mar 2011 05:49:11 +0000

Where there is smoke, sometimes there are arsonists.

By: korollocke

korollocke — Mon, 07 Mar 2011 05:13:31 +0000

Because of the string of utter crap like this, when something real is finally found, no one will believe it.

By: DWA

DWA — Fri, 04 Mar 2011 23:41:47 +0000

When there is smoke, there may be fire.

When there is THIS MUCH SMOKE, and it smells like this, one should look not for fire, but for mirrors.

I won’t be interested in this, one bit, until the mainstream of science is. I can certainly wait to see it. Indefinitely.

A video, not of the purported face, but of someone describing the purported face.

HUHNH?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?!?!?!?!?!?

By: graybear

graybear — Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:06:28 +0000

If the film was taken six years ago and it STILL hasn’t seen the light of day, then the chances of it being fake are several hundred to one. If it were real then it would have been all over the media. It might even have been as big as the seemingly inescapable Charley Sheen mess!

By: fossilhunter

fossilhunter — Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:31:17 +0000

Eyes that don’t blink? Don’t all mammals have eyes that blink? The only living creatures with eyes that don’t blink, that I can think of, live in water.

By: MattBille

MattBille — Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:22:14 +0000

eiremen,
Perhaps the right term is “gorilla” marketing?

Seriously, this is the kind of thing we have heard many times before. Do I hope they have documented a real sasquatch? Heck, yes! Do I THINK they have? No.

By: lukedog

lukedog — Thu, 03 Mar 2011 09:51:16 +0000

Well said Greg. I’ve decided not to hold my breath either. To drip feed evidence in the hoax filled crypto world smacks of deception.