Comments on: Massacre Mania Continues

By: c.stark

c.stark — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 06:35:24 +0000

In 1967 attitudes weren’t as enlightened as they are now, most people would have jumped at the chance to claim to be the first person to kill a Sasquatch. Also, the kind of people who would gun down a group of sasquatches in cold blood would be the first to boast of their exploits. Such a brazen and violent act would be the work of narcissistic sociopaths who would enjoy being the center of attention. There’s no way someone would do this and then cover up the evidence; they would brag about it, it’s human nature. M. K. Davis’ claims are illogical and implausible, and hurt cryptozoology as a whole. At first I didn’t know whether to be angry with him or pity him; now all I feel is disappointment. Let us never speak of him again…

By: BOOTYMONSTER

BOOTYMONSTER — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:31:48 +0000

I’ve been visiting Cryptomundo for several years. If I had to bet my money I’d say bigfoot is real, and I have a few other opinions about the different topics covered here. This massacre thing is a huge embarassment to the crypto community. I don’t believe this for a second.

By: alanborky

alanborky — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:08:11 +0000

If we’ve just found out our lottery ticket’s the winner of the jackpot, and it begins to rain, we might start into a recreation of Gene Kelly’s Singing In The Rain routine, exulting at how glorious life is.

However, if our beloved’s just kicked us out the house even as they’re moving our replacement in, and it begins to rain, we may feel the world is weeping with us – or maybe even God’s gloatingly compounding his lack of mercy to us by taking a leak on our head.

The point is, our frame of mind powerfully influences how we interpret the world around us, and MK’s interpretation of the Patty film(s), tells me he’s become increasingly identified with the idea of a figure who’s supposed to be the ’star’ of the show (Patty/the Patty film stabiliser – i.e., MK himself) but who instead has ended up becoming the victim of what he perceives as a treacherously murderous ambush.

If the next MK version of the Patty Story has it she buys herself a load of guns and ammo and sets off in pursuit of vengeance on those who wronged her and her kind then, hell, Loren, I’d suggest you and some of your colleagues might consider going into retreat yourself for a bit!

By: Rob008

Rob008 — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:00:02 +0000

Come On Guys!. Why are we listening to this clown. He’s as bad as Tom Biscardi. MK, if you are reading this, I have some beach front in El Paso to sell you real cheap.

By: grandmamoses

grandmamoses — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:28:07 +0000

MK has been fermenting this latest steaming mess since March 24, 2009.

By: grandmamoses

grandmamoses — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:00:24 +0000

I have heard MK personally state at one time, that he quit his regular job and was planning on making a living at Bigfoot. Pretty ambitious considering that you can count the pro Bigfooters on one hand that can do that, and their tactics are somewhat suspect to say the least. My old gut tells me that MK is being paid perhaps $80,000 per year to keep the Bigfoot massacre alive ad infinitum, no matter how confused and ridiculous a story he can concoct. For instance, if a Bigfoot skin was available, why not photograph that Bigfoot before it was skinned, instead of a live one calmly exiting stage right, apparently completely oblivious to the alleged massacre that had just taken place. Nothing makes sense with either the first or most recent massacre concoction. MK further claims that it is all self explanatory, in order to dodge the burden of lucidly explaining it. But he doesn’t have to explain it because in my opinion, his hidden agenda is to taint as many of the great names in Bigfoot history as possible. Soon the other paid scoftics on James Randi, will start quoting MK in order to shore up their own endless “research by proclamation” arguements. National news agencies will begin quoting MK, in order to tell the public what they wanted to hear all along.

A lot of slow thinkers in the US cannot deal with either a F&B or a paranormal Bigfoot. Not because of clandestine timber interests, but rather because they have insufficient field experience to realize that Bigfoot is not a threat to either them or their children. Bigfoot knows that he can always walk, run, or fly away, in order to avoid a confrontation with man. Man is a creature that the Bigfoot is not particularly interested in getting too close to. Because Bigfoot knows that mankind cannot be trusted, as MK repeatedly and inadvertantly offers up some pretty compelling evidence of.

I would just like to turn MK over my knee and give him a spankin that he won’t soon forget. But I don’t think that I could hoist him without putting a run in my hose and a tear in my girdle. So I might just have to settle for burying my shoe, where the sun don’t shine.

By: cryptidsrus

cryptidsrus — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:21:21 +0000

Good explanation given by Green.

If there was any legitimate evidence to support Davis’s claims I would (maybe) give this a shot. But as such, there is none.

Oh well…
Better “luck” next time, Mr. Davis.

By: rayval68

rayval68 — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:20:05 +0000

Its hard to believe that this man was taken serious at one time.His dedication and hard work brought stability and clarity to an important piece of evidence,No question about it. His undying devotion for this film has made it possible for us to see things that were once hazy and indistinct. I’m sure his efforts are appreciated by most researchers as well as the buffs.I know I’m grateful.
Now for the problem. I think what’s going on here is that he should have left good enough alone .Davis would have been best off by calling it a day after the whole digger Indian fiasco went down.He didn’t score any points with that nonsense. I think he said somewhere that he has been working on this film for the last 10 years of his life.Talk about being obsessed!! Any one can see what transpired. After viewing the same 60 second piece of footage thousands and thousands of times, he began to see things that weren’t there.The Patterson film became Davis’s own Rorschach test to some degree and his psychological interpretation of the off screen action draws big laughs from most. I do feel sorry for him because I think he really means well. His problem could also be that what he had to work with wasn’t enough and he wanted more. After bleeding this footage and milking it for all it was worth, the closure he was counting on never arrived. He once said that “I was prepared to go where the research took me.” I wonder if that included the nut house?
I think Davis really needs to close the book for a little while.Go take a vacation,play ball with the kids or do anything for that matter just as long as it doesn’t involve Bigfoot.This poor guys obsessive compulsive disorder has probably taken a toll on his private life as well. Jesus, I’m surprised he’s not in divorcee court. His imagination brings new meaning to the word speculation. O yea,and one more thing, remember kiddies,”All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.” Doctor heal thyself !

By: kentmcmanigal

kentmcmanigal — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:48:32 +0000

I have dealt with, and seen, many fresh animal skins. They don’t look anything like that blobsquatch hide on the ground; not even if you squint. I know that those who wish to believe it won’t be convinced, but I know what I know.

By: Robb

Robb — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:32:29 +0000

I watched the YouTube videos before they were taken down. I agree that these claims are pretty ridiculous… it’s as if someone went crazy with the features in Photoshop and then concluded that they are “evidence” of blood ( it’s a good thing he didn’t play with the “Impressionistic” effects, or we might end up with a theory that bigfoot bit off Vincent Van Gogh’s ear !

Anyway… does this imply that we should no longer treat the Davis’ Patterson stabilization seriously?