Lost Thunderbird Photo Found?
Posted by: Loren Coleman on March 14th, 2006
In Mark A. Hall’s book, Thunderbirds: America’s Living Legends of Giant Birds, he examines the alleged photographic evidence for these cryptid birds in depth. At the end of his discussion, he writes: “The status of the infamous ‘Thunderbird photograph’ has remained the same for years. A lot of people think they have seen the picture. Everyone wants to see it. But no one can produce a copy.”
Writer Shawn Lindseth over at Awesome Or Off-Putting has penned a new mini-feature on Thunderbirds. Okay, that’s interesting, but what is more intriguing to me is the “photograph” shown with the blog, pictured here:
Is this the long lost “Thunderbird photo”? There is no caption. Why keep all this mystery going with another old seemingly “lost” photograph? From our Cryptomundo commenters, of course, it is just another computer-created “lost Thunderbird photo”. But it does beg the question, how many times are we going to see this photo popping up again and again as “the” lost T-bird snapshot?
The internet has many formerly flying candidates for the “lost photo.” They have included everything from the drawing of what people remember (below)…
…to the confusing “Mystery Civil War Pterodactyl” photo (directly below), in fact produced for the year 2000’s fictional program, “Freaky Links.”
Pterodactyl photograph used with permission of Gregg Hale, Executive Director, Haxan Productions. Credit, Fox TV.
What’s in your wallet? Do you have a photograph of the Thunderbird? Or have seen it?
Random Posts
- Similar Phenomena:
This photo is not new. It’s been circulating on the internet for at least a year or two. Who knows if it’s real or not. I wish all of them were real!
That photo was published in an issue of Strange Magazine 19 in 1998. It’s referred to as the “Ivan Verlaine” photo. It’s a complete hoax. Later, in Strange 20, Mark Chorvinsky showed how the photo was manipulated from “a posed photograph of the capture of the outlaw John Sontag,” in 1892.
Chorvinsky did a great series on the search for the Thunderbird photo in Strange 21-23. Unfortunately, he passed away before completing the series, but the first 3 parts are still available online.
Thanks for the information. Well, its still circulating and being taken as “proof.” Of course it is a fake.
I am tired of vagueness in the discussion of these photographs, aren’t you?
Loren, I’m not sure that Shawn Lindseth is using that photo of “proof” of anything. In fact, he doesn’t even reference it in his brief write-up of the Thunderbird mystery. Of course, it does accompany the article, but Lindseth just makes a general comment about Thunderbird photos: “Throughout the years some photographs of the creatures have emerged. Most of them are decried as obvious fakes, others deserve a deeper look.”
Hi Guys,
There was a lengthy discustion about the “Lost Photo” at Fortfest some years ago. I was one of the few people who actualy recalled having the photo in a book. I even had the name of the book!
The first time I heard about the missing photo was in an INFO magazine. I said to my husband “That photo isnt missing I have it right here”, went to the book and couldnt find the photo. I literly drove myself crazy looking in every book and magazine I owned, thinking perhaps I was mistaken about which book. In the end I was never able to produce the book with the photo in it.
Strange, because I know the photo was in a book called “Mysteries of the Unexplained”. It was on page 45. I was given this book as a gift in the 1980’s when I was in Highschool. I studied this book, showed it to every one I knew and talked about it all the time! When I met my husband, and started telling him about Fortean Phenom. I showed this book, and the photo of the Thunderbird nailed to an out building/small barn wall. He was also shocked to find out the photo was gone.
I dont talk about the missing photo much anymore. People start looking at you like your nutz…but to the best of my recolection here is what the photo looked like:
One man standing next to an out building or small sized barn. He was wearing a hat, not a cowboy hat. Nailed to the barn wall was a pteradactyl. It was facing downwards.
I have a theory about the missing photo, it’s pretty far fetched, even as Fortean theorys go:
I suspect that someone with the ability to go back in time stopped the photo from being taken. After that occurred the photo disapeared from all the books and magazines it was ever in.
I think this happened in the early 1990’s. Sounds crazy I know, but I also know I had the photo in a book prior to 1996.
Kim
That is a pretty fantastic theory, but it seems to me that all knowledge of the photos ever having existed would have vanished if someone went back in time to prevent the photos from being taken. I mean, the photos would simply never have existed in that case, rather than actually vanishing from books sometime in the 90’s (at the instant that this person went back in time).
Companeros,
This is my first post on this forum. As a teen in the late 1980’s, I recall seeing a book of unexplained mysteries with the infamous Thunderbird pic. I seem to remember that it was an old picture of a enormous bird or eagle nailed to a barn, not a Pterodactyl. I remember the pic bothered me because it was nailed to the barn with its wings spread out and it took up the entire side of the barn. Just my 2 cents.
siquisiri
To Kim:
Do you remember who the author of that book is, and do you still have it? “Mysteries of the Unexplained” seems to be a pretty common title.
hmmm, temporal paradox’s always stretch the brain. If you went back in time and killed your mother before you were conceived, how could you exist to do that?
Before we indulge in Fortean space-time warps as explanations for “missing” photographs I’d like to suggest that those curious about these things to research “false memory” and “confabulation” as likely candidates to explain this mystery.
Though is is highly probable everyone has false memories, most people are not even aware of the term or understand its significance.
The issue of false memory has a great bearing on investigation of anomaly research.
With all the proficient use of photoshop these days, you can never be sure if what you’re seeing is real. There’s also another version of the Civil War soldiers Thunderbird photo I’ve seen as well.
I own a Readers’ Digest anthology-type book that I believe is called Mysteries of the Unexplained, but I don’t rememer a thunderbird photo in it (it’s at my parent’s home in another province right now).
Regarding the off-topic discussion of time-travel, I’ve always considered that if we allow for the possibility of travelling ‘into’ the past, then we must see time as being cyclical, as some Eastern religions suggest. Different ‘points’ in time exist simultaneously, in which case different timelines (like one in which Kim possessed that photo) might exist alongside others (like one in which she did not). So going back and changing something might not eliminate it from existance, but merely send everything down a different path. So perhaps she has a memory from one path while experiencing another?
I’m told that the concept of string theory (or is it M-Theory?) in Theoretical Physics suggests that all possible series of events that can occur, do occur, in the proverbial “other dimensions”.
Just a thought.
The descriptions are completely in accord with what I saw when I was a kid (in a general fortean-interest book, cant remember the title, but I remember the photo); every “thunderbird photo” ever since has NOT been the one I saw - I’ll know the real one when I do.
Does anyone remember when TIME LIFE books did mysteries of the unknown? There was a book that had a picture of a thunderbird in the air, above an indian reservation. I cannot find that book. My mother had the whole series and there are only two books left and neither one of them has the pic. I am sure it was a time life book. I do remember that it looked like a pterodactyl and I had nightmares after seeing it. The photo was taken in early 1900’s I think.
BG
Oh yeah, I had that Time Life series too. The ‘monsters’ issue was called “Mysterious Creatures” I think. The cover showed the silhouette of a sasquatch viewed from behind.
I don’t remember thunderbird material in it, but perhaps I just forgot. (That book’s also at my parents’ place - I may have to call my folks and put them to work!).
Tube, I entirely agree with you about false memory and confabulation. And yet, there’s some really powerful mojo at work with the thunderbird photo. When I first heard about the lost thunderbird photo, my first thought was, “Oh, yeah, I’ve seen that.”
I’m willing to concede that there is no such photo; nonetheless, I find it fascinating that so many people (including me) should find the suggestion so irresistably strong.
I first heard about the lost thunderbird photo around the same time I first heard of Black Eyed Kids. The BEK story was so compelling and suggestive, that I was sure we’d shortly be inundated with confabulated or hypnogogic accounts of BEKs. And yet, there’s almost nothing beyond the original Usenet post. But I bet you could easily find thousands of people willing to swear that they’ve seen the lost T-bird photo.
What IS it with this phenomena? I’ve never encountered BEK, but I SWEAR I’ve seen the legendary Thunderbird photo when I was a kid, flipping through books of the unexplained at my local library.
I even once remember swinging in my backyard on my swingset around ‘83 or ‘84 in small-town Iowa, when I heard a loud flapping above me. Now when I looked up this was definitely a bird with feathers, but the wingspan was so immense and the audible wing flaps froze me where I was. Now granted, I was 5 or 6 at the time, but I went and told my teacher about the incident the next day. She said “It sounds like you’ve seen a Thunderbird.” That was the first I had ever heard and/or possibly seen such a thing, and have been fascinated with it ever since.
I have seen the photo. But have not seen it since. What sense does that make? Truly a mystery, and seemingly one many people are trying to solve themselves to this day.
This is pretty fascinating. So none of you are referring to any of these photos?:
Thunderbird photos.
I remember seeing the bird nailed to the side of a barn in a book, it may have been the TIME_LIFE series. We need to see if we can find the series. I know my high school had the series but I will check local libraries.
WOW- Check out this website. It has a great collection of crypto-related pictures.
Here is photo of a thunderbird they had.
In the late 70’s, while in school, I read books about cryptids, aliens, ancient peoples. I do clearly remember a book with a picture of a large black bird.In the picture were six cowboys standing side by side with arms outstretched holding the bird spread-eagle to show the wing span. I do not remember a barn(probably a false memory), though there could have been one in the background.The caption below told the story. Two of them,I believe,were riding far from town , near cliffs, one heard a shriek and looked up.Both astonished, they shot it down with a rifle.The six men were close to six feet each, giving the bird a wingspan of nearly 36 feet.The picture was reported to be factual, and looked to be.
RECENT SIGHTING!
I am currently living in Washington state. I have seen a thunderbird over Shoreline, WA in late July of 2006. I called every news station to get a camera and or crews outside to cover the sighting and to verify what I had seen. To describe the bird would be to a big brown bird. What makes the sighting interesting is the circumstances behind the flight and movement.
About 2 PM I heard what seemed to be a small anoying ultralight passing over head, I looked up to notice what first appaerd to be and ultrlight. However, the ultralight was soundless, the noise was comming from a sea plane over to the north and east heading towards lake union to land. I could see the line or tie rope hanging down. My attention turned to the soundless ultralight above and moving northerly along 15 Ave NE and NE 145 St. I was surprised to see such definition in the wings - this was no ultrlight, it had a first glimpse yes, and it moved without a flexing of it’s wings. I looked back over my right shoulder again at the sea plane heading away and getting quiter in the distance as it lowered over the trees and horizon. I felt a strange thought about how and what this was and then the bird of huge size, flexed it’s wings in against it’s side and directly back out. I saw this movement only once as I continued my watch under it’s glide. I could see the end feathers of it’s wings different from the body due to the sun shinning through them slightly. I could make out legs and clawed feet behind in flying position.
So, now that I have witnessed this movement of wings and the feathers, I asked my self, Self is this what you think? I really went through the process of denial and how? I watched as the huge bird (the thunderbird) soared up and away, I repeat up and away and it’s size and shape never varied again. It moved westerly and northerly towards to Puget sound.
I will testify before any panel, on any subject of validity. I saw a huge bird with a wing span of 30 feet about 10 to 15 feet long from beek to toenail. The color brown with no markings, legs were only variation of color. Wings folded horizontal in and dirctly back out again. No sound was heard other than the plane flying away. The sound was the initial reason to look up, I thought who would fly an ultralight in town - the sound was from a sea plane and the difference is as gross as boat and a duck.
Reality check…the above message was written in April 2006 about a “recent sighting” in July 2006. Time travel is not allowed in the CryptoZoo because we do not have hand railings installed yet, and so please clarify if you are discussing a 2005 sighting in July or a 2006 sighting in some other month than July?
Thank you.
It would also help if you didn’t recount your story as if you were writing a poem.
My bad, I really apologise, It was of course July 2005 of last year. I really made a huge error, can all who please forgive such a grevious error. I again really feel bad that I could create such a frenzy with just a date wrong or in this case year. Do you all write your congressmen and the political structures with the same scrutiny shown with the recent sighting article.
I am very impressesed that so many people are reading.
I made a mistake. Thank you for the corrective requirement. I felt it a direct attack upon my person. Thanks and peace out.
I own both the Reader’s Digest book “Mysteries of the Unexplained” and the full Time-Life series “Mysteries of the Unknown”. I’ve looked through “Unexplained”, and the Thunderbird is never mentioned, and there is no photo. The closest thing is a brief story about French miners in 1856 who broke open a limestone boulder and were startled when a creature stumbled out of the boulder and died at their feet. The article gives a good description of the thing, and says a local paleontology student identified it as a pterodactyl. (page 45, for those who want to read the story themselves).
I did not look through every one of the Time-Life books, but the Thunderbird is never mentioned in the “Mysterious Creatures” volume. Thankfully, I own the master index book for the series, and it lists “Thunderbird” as being discussed in “The Mysterious World” volume on pages 47 and 50, and “Pteradactyl” on pages 67, 68 and 70 of the same volume. There are brief comments, but again, no photos, just a drawing or two.
I also could have sworn that I saw the famous photo “somewhere”, and was initially sure it must have been in one of the books mentioned above. After looking at the internet photos, however, I’m pretty sure these are the ones I was remembering.
I’m newly passionate of Cryptozoology, with a special interest in thunderbirds. Regarding the Thunderbird photo, I’m not one of the people that “supposedly” saw or had this fascinating photo. However, in the Internet I’ve found a sketch of this photo, made by a person that argues that has seen it in elementary school in a book about Dinosaurs. I hope this sketch can help people that say that they have seen it to have a clear picture about it.
Gotta say, I remember that photo as well… (the one of the supposed Thunderbird nailed to a barn wall) my memory is of it looking oddly crow-like… the feathers were tark grey or black… hard to tell because the photo was black & white. I do remember the thing, and I remember having a strong reaction to it. Damn, just wish I could find it!
Ok, I know I just posted a few minutes ago, but geez… this is REALLY messing with me! I know I saw the picture, I know others have seen it as well. Why can’t we find it? I don’t know about you guys, but, this is nuts. Group false memory? I have no idea……..
When I was around 10 years old (I’m 40 now)I saw this photograph in a book about sea serpents. It had all kinds of strange creatures in it including bigfoot, loch ness monster and others. I know without a doubt that this thunderbird photo was in that book. I remember the cowboys standing in front of this giant bird nailed to a barn wall.
I too remember this photograph. The first time I heard about the controversy I was confused. I remember seeing it clearly in a book in my elementary school library in the early 80’s. I’ve forgotten the title, but it was some variation on “mysteries” and/or “unexplained”. The cover photo was of the crystal skulls. In retrospect, I suppose it’s possible this photo was a representation relating to the missing photo mystery. When did people first start asking this question?
The photograph I remember showed a half dozen or more men standing and kneeling behind the outstretched wings of a giant creature, although I remember it as being across a shallow-pitched low roof rather than a wall.
I think I’m going to have to go back to my old school and try to find this book.
I too remember seeing the Thunderbird scene: five or six grim-faced cowboys holding shooting irons, standing side by side in front of a huge barn to which a spreadeagled pterodactyl is affixed.
However, I don’t recall seeing it in any of the commonly quoted sources, and it wasn’t a photograph.
Back in the 60s, when I was an impressionable 8-10 year old, I was an incurable reader of weird books. Among my favorites were a series of pocketbook reprints of Ripley’s Believe It Or Not cartoons. My 40-year-old memories tell me the Thunderbird scene was one of Ripley’s realistically rendered comics.
Perhaps that’s why a _photograph_ of the Thunderbird eludes discovery.
Has anyone ever searched Ripley’s archives (if there is such a thing) for leads into the Thunderbird story?
I know this is an old thread, but I have to share my story. Like Kim, I believe that I once saw the thunderbird photo in a book.
I visited the local library a lot in those days (this would have been late-’80s to mid-’90s) and read the book often. I was really into the Philadelphia Experiment, and I believe the book had a chapter on the disappearance of the Navy ship as well. (I can’t remember the title. Sorry.)
One day, I was doing some reading about the thunderbird and how the photo had been lost. I thought, “That’s weird, it’s in that other book.” I went to the library and looked through book I knew so well. I looked repeatedly, but could not find the photo. There was a description of the photo, but the photo itself was not in the book.
I know exactly what it looks like. It’s in my head, an image of several men standing by the side of a barn with a large bird/pterodactyl tacked up on the side of the building. The men are standing a bit a part with arms stretched to show the relative size of the bird.
Reading Kim’s story freaked me out a little because it mirrors my own. I don’t know if I buy her “time travel” theory, but something is amiss in the universe’s continuity. Maybe it is false memory. If it is, that in and of itself is an interesting phenomenon.
I have grown into a HUGE thunderbird fanatic. my dad told me a story about why they are called thunderbirds and mentioned “the photo”. a bird nailed to a barn accompanied by a half dozen men spread finger tip to finger tip. i will ask him where he saw / if he has the photo.
i believe they may look either like a vulture/condor/buzzard or more like a hawk/eagle. the first would probably be southern like in southern north america and south america and the second in northern northern america and canada.
but,
i could always be wrong.