Personally, I just didn’t and don’t find the toons all that funny. Something about kicking a man (Chow) when he’s down just doesn’t sit well with me. If one truly has respect for Chow, now would have been the time to show it. I feel bad for Chow — but I still can’t believe he thought those photo’s were of real animals. Standing behind someone, during the worst of times is a difficulf but admirable thing to do. Drawing cartoons to further embarrass someone is very easy.

“jjames1 point taken, my point was Chow’s descriptions were accurate.”

Your point is very clear, but what motivation would he have to mischaracterize what he saw in the pictures?

Wayne

Probably a good idea to discuss some research and photograph protocols…nice cartoons…a shame folks reputations were damaged…they will get over it…JMHO

No bucks…No bigfoot….

ole bub and the dawgs

As I recall, it all started with SPI’s invitation to anyone interested in joining the team in their investigations. This led to my meeting with Kenny Fong and, subsequently, Vincent Chow at a press conference. Now, up to that point in time, Kenny had no idea that there were photographs. SPI had merely tried to gather more evidence to support the initial sighting. The photo claim was as much a surprise to Kenny as it was to me.

From what I’ve witnessed, and in my opinion, Vincent Chow was more of an influence on Kenny Fong than vice versa. I doubt that Kenny would have been able to mislead Chow if he had wanted to as Chow appeared to be commanding the proceedings. In fact, we were trying to gather information from Chow instead of feeding him with “misinformation”. The fact remains that Chow was pretty confident of what he had seen, evident from the smugness he exuded. Who is to blame then? Like I said in my cartoon, it all boils down to a matter of sound judgment on the part of the eyewitness. Without hard evidence, we could only hang on to this till the rope snaps.

This is a NEW DAY! Don’t dwell on the past, my homies!! MOVE ON!!