Comments on: Laverty on Bigfoot Claims of Heironimous

By: awalrus1

awalrus1 — Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:11:14 +0000

Loren,
Has anyone like Dr. Meldrum looked at the Patterson casts yet? In detail? to say whether they have dermal ridges and such?
steve

By: fuzzy

fuzzy — Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:07:14 +0000

WHAT A JUVENILE MESS! If this is indicative of the intellectual level of Bigfoot research, I think it may be time to just quit and go fishin’!

By: treeclaw

treeclaw — Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:39:31 +0000

Well I just choose my truth based on the information before me. As I said before, IMO, Patterson’s movie looks like a human in a monkey suit. Exactly who was under that suit does not matter to me either. Again, I don’t go by words as much as what the picture is telling me.

By: kittenz

kittenz — Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:44:05 +0000

The problem with this is, though it’s intriguing, it still isn’t evidence. It’s really just one person’s word against another’s.

I don’t know if there is a way to get to the truth behind the P/G film and tracks. In the end you just have to choose whether you believe one person or the other.

By: shumway10973

shumway10973 — Thu, 12 Apr 2007 06:33:34 +0000

I can understand skepticism concerning the film, but to out and out lie about something so important…I just can’t understand people who have to do that. Besides, if DWA has the right story in mind (the suit used), I want their tailor. That would be the best ape suit I have ever seen. Too many variables with in the footage itself that prove it real, for anybody to successfully disprove it as a hoax.

By: squatchwatcher

squatchwatcher — Thu, 12 Apr 2007 05:40:42 +0000

If that truly is a real bigfoot on Patterson’s film, which I myself believe is, why is this Bob Heironimous trying to say he is the one in the costume? I guess I just don’t have the understanding of someone wanting their fifteen minutes of fame. Is BH still claiming that he was the guy in the suit? I haven’t heard anything from him since “Is It Real?” interviewed him. Why doesn’t he just give it up since he can’t really prove anything. I’m still asking, “Where’s the suit?” It’s just like everybody saying to the possibility of a real sasquatch, produce a body, then we’ll believe you.” Well, I’m asking produce the actual suit and show how the hoax was done and then I’ll believe that ol’ Bob H. was wearing the stinking suit!

By: DWA

DWA — Thu, 12 Apr 2007 01:14:16 +0000

Geez.

And here I thought we already knew that BH and GL are totally off base. BH indicted himself neatly with his “testimony” that the best costume of the 1960s was a stitched up ol’ smelly horsehide, did he not? Or do I have the wrong “I was Patty” here ?

GL’s shrillness takes care of him. Too many caps, man!