That said, the earlier drawing, actually, seems to reflect those more human features we see in the photo-tracing, although the white color and lack of “fly away” hair could have been seen as misleading. In the second drawing the heavily lined face, “crazy eyes” and bad teeth are distracting, and lend the image a more ghoulish appearance, but in this one we see the hair looking more tousled and an even more human jaw, chin and brow, along with larger ears.

Actually, neither look much like the photo-tracing, but then, none of the caricatures I’ve ever had done ever looked like me, and those artists were staring right at me when they did those.

Peter Loh has shown considerable skill in his drawings, but at this point, if Chow is going to release tracings of the photos, he may as well go ahead and release the images.

(Interesting too, the “(c) Vincent Chow” on the sketches. Anyone with experience in copyright law on here? Is it OK to make a tracing of a photo that you don’t have the rights to publish and to then copyright and publish that tracing? Seems like it would be a little like me re-recording and releasing “American Beauty”, but with myself playing drums instead of Mickey and Bill, and then copyrighting it as my own. Can one do that?)

But hold on this as supposed to be a YOUNG Johar Hiominid face. Young and adults often look somewhat different.

most disturbing to me is a small note on the sketch page of the johor site noting that the drawings are only 70-80% based on the original photograph. that removes almost all of the justification for a strange way to distribute the information in the first place. If each artist only based their drawings on the photos about 70% maybe that explains all the various interpretations. Strange way to present evidence,

As for the third drawing, it never looked like more than something out of a low-budget zombie movie.

But, enough drawings… it’s time for photos, if there are really any.

Do the people with the alleged photos not realise that the longer this goes on the less interested people will become.

Its getting to a point now where I can see these photos being of Orangutangs and the owners of the material are so desperate to milk any publicity they can can before it becomes obvious to the world that they have nothing just some photos of some Apes in an area where they are rare but I suggest there are no Bigfoot photos waiting to be published. No fortunes to be earned and then back to obscurity for the Johor gang.

Sorry but this is just the way I see it .

If such is proved, what do you think the fallout will be for the face of cryptozoology? Let alone the face of the Johor Hominid!