Comments on: Bigfoot Filmmaker’s Statement

By: John L. Johnsen

John L. Johnsen — Sat, 17 May 2008 02:01:00 +0000

In regard to the post about hypertrichosis the answer is a solid no. Patty is human. Not as in Homo sapiens, but surely of the genus Homo.

By: SOCALcryptid

SOCALcryptid — Fri, 16 May 2008 23:43:50 +0000

John L. Johnsen, In your last comment you mentioned that in your opinion there is adequate evidence Patty is human. Are you saying that Patty is a human who has Hypertrichosis? A hair covered body except for the palms of the hands and soles of the feet.

Can you say anything more on what this new evidence is concerning?

By: John L. Johnsen

John L. Johnsen — Fri, 16 May 2008 19:08:24 +0000

Too late. That film has been released now for 8 months or so. There was adequate evidence, in my opinion, to indicate that Patty was human and not pongid. I pulled the film from sales pending Davis’s decision as to re-release it with the stuff he is working on now…which is NOT anything concerning the humanity of Patty.

John Johnsen

By: CamperGuy

CamperGuy — Fri, 16 May 2008 16:15:49 +0000

My post in the recent “race card in Bigfootry ” blog:

Is the theory being put forth that in north America there is a current situation that parrallels Europe at the time of the Neanderthals ( I like the old spelling) ?

Current blog:

“….let the record show that I DO believe in the absolute humanity of the Patterson film subject. Homo sapiens? No, but some other sub species for certain.”

Evidence will need to be very credible to support this theory. Looking forward to what happens next.

By: John L. Johnsen

John L. Johnsen — Fri, 16 May 2008 14:55:18 +0000

I believe I was clear in my comment above. He (Davis) indicated that all he would be doing was honoring Patterson, not making any earth shattering announcements. And, that my involvement depends both on Davis’s decision to continue and what is truly revealed at the weekend conference. Cut and dried.

By: Artist

Artist — Fri, 16 May 2008 14:15:50 +0000

And now, for something completely different…

By: Jason P.

Jason P. — Fri, 16 May 2008 13:54:40 +0000

I guess I don’t really get the point of this statement. It doesn’t tell us anything new and is extremely vague. Why bother?