<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Igor Bourtsev Defends Carter Claims</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/igor09/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/igor09/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:57:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Know it all</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/igor09/comment-page-2/#comment-56448</link>
		<dc:creator>Know it all</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=18347#comment-56448</guid>
		<description>So my paternal Grandad growing up near Trannsylvania Rumania encounters a shopkeeper&#039;s pet parrot who when given a piece of buttered toast was asked &quot;Polly wants some butter bread (?)&quot;; and thereafter the bird demands when hungry &quot;Polly wants some butter bread!&quot; (flawlessly in the native language)... I recall Cheeta the chimpanzee in Weismuller Tarzan flicks putting on Jane&#039;s dresses, make-up and working the tree house mechanical contraptions... And i&#039;ve seen pet dogs taught to say &quot;I wuv you&quot;...

Certainly it&#039;s not unreasonable to suggest a higher level of intelligence for sasquatch genus &amp; species than the aforementioned species.

As far as twisted limbs are concerned, being a &quot;macho&quot; display of males, they aren&#039;t just going to be twisting little shoots and saplings.

A 200 lb. Chimp is more than 7 times the strength of a man, a gorilla of 400 lb. more than 10 times the strength of a 200 lb. man. With reports of sasquatches swimming along  the length of rivers against the current and swimming as much as 20 miles out to sea, carrying 300 lb. weights in one hand for 30 miles without resting or running as fast as a horse with 200 lbs under EACH arm (400 lb. total), how strong do you think they are as a multi mile foraging, mountain climbing forager/hunter compared to a comparatively sedentary lazy-butt chimp or gorilla? - Like comparing a sedentary desk locked couch potato executive with a body building weightlifter entering an Iron Man competition.

Just lb. for lb. a Sasquatch would have 2 or 3 times the muscle sinew density/strength and endurance of an African primate (explaining the numerous times they are reported to have been shot in the previous Century, even multiple times with gilded jecketed soft point lead 30.06 class weapons with little effect due to catastrophic bullet failure in the external muscle mass).

An 8 to 11 foot tall male &quot;Bigfoot&quot; weighing anywhere from let&#039;s say 600 lbs. to 3 thousand lbs. would have a tree twisting strength from 40X,  to in excess of a couple hundred times greater than that of the average man... Is there evidence of such strong tree limbs twisted with that corresponding level of strength?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So my paternal Grandad growing up near Trannsylvania Rumania encounters a shopkeeper&#8217;s pet parrot who when given a piece of buttered toast was asked &#8220;Polly wants some butter bread (?)&#8221;; and thereafter the bird demands when hungry &#8220;Polly wants some butter bread!&#8221; (flawlessly in the native language)&#8230; I recall Cheeta the chimpanzee in Weismuller Tarzan flicks putting on Jane&#8217;s dresses, make-up and working the tree house mechanical contraptions&#8230; And i&#8217;ve seen pet dogs taught to say &#8220;I wuv you&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Certainly it&#8217;s not unreasonable to suggest a higher level of intelligence for sasquatch genus &amp; species than the aforementioned species.</p>
<p>As far as twisted limbs are concerned, being a &#8220;macho&#8221; display of males, they aren&#8217;t just going to be twisting little shoots and saplings.</p>
<p>A 200 lb. Chimp is more than 7 times the strength of a man, a gorilla of 400 lb. more than 10 times the strength of a 200 lb. man. With reports of sasquatches swimming along  the length of rivers against the current and swimming as much as 20 miles out to sea, carrying 300 lb. weights in one hand for 30 miles without resting or running as fast as a horse with 200 lbs under EACH arm (400 lb. total), how strong do you think they are as a multi mile foraging, mountain climbing forager/hunter compared to a comparatively sedentary lazy-butt chimp or gorilla? &#8211; Like comparing a sedentary desk locked couch potato executive with a body building weightlifter entering an Iron Man competition.</p>
<p>Just lb. for lb. a Sasquatch would have 2 or 3 times the muscle sinew density/strength and endurance of an African primate (explaining the numerous times they are reported to have been shot in the previous Century, even multiple times with gilded jecketed soft point lead 30.06 class weapons with little effect due to catastrophic bullet failure in the external muscle mass).</p>
<p>An 8 to 11 foot tall male &#8220;Bigfoot&#8221; weighing anywhere from let&#8217;s say 600 lbs. to 3 thousand lbs. would have a tree twisting strength from 40X,  to in excess of a couple hundred times greater than that of the average man&#8230; Is there evidence of such strong tree limbs twisted with that corresponding level of strength?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ella Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/igor09/comment-page-2/#comment-56417</link>
		<dc:creator>Ella Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=18347#comment-56417</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, DWA (I meant DWA before, not DMA).  I&#039;m not about to get into any debate about whether Squatch is ape or human or in between because I just don&#039;t know enough to do so!  I have no idea how keen their sense of smell is, and probably neither does anyone else, though it&#039;s got to be pretty keen, as is that of much other wildlife and even domestic creatures.

Now, I want to say that I smoked like a freight train for 30 years  or so and quit some years ago because so many of my friends were dropping dead of lung cancer, COPD and emphysema.  Add to the smoking my many allergies that clog up my nose and entire resplratory system, and my sense of smell is almost completely gone.  No more stopping to smell the roses for me!  So I would only guess that Bigfoots have an excellent sense of smell or they couldn&#039;t survive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, DWA (I meant DWA before, not DMA).  I&#8217;m not about to get into any debate about whether Squatch is ape or human or in between because I just don&#8217;t know enough to do so!  I have no idea how keen their sense of smell is, and probably neither does anyone else, though it&#8217;s got to be pretty keen, as is that of much other wildlife and even domestic creatures.</p>
<p>Now, I want to say that I smoked like a freight train for 30 years  or so and quit some years ago because so many of my friends were dropping dead of lung cancer, COPD and emphysema.  Add to the smoking my many allergies that clog up my nose and entire resplratory system, and my sense of smell is almost completely gone.  No more stopping to smell the roses for me!  So I would only guess that Bigfoots have an excellent sense of smell or they couldn&#8217;t survive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: norman-uk</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/igor09/comment-page-2/#comment-56404</link>
		<dc:creator>norman-uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=18347#comment-56404</guid>
		<description>DWA 
  Impressions, feelings, perceptions  about other human beings is what human are good at, some better than others. We learn and gather confidence about these abilities according to our interest and how successful we become with experience and practice. Its a normal useful and valuable part of inter-action with fellow humans and allows us to minimise arbitrary or wholly subjective descisions. So it may not be science as you know it but there is a lot more to life and humanity than science.
   These kinds of skills are not limited to man except in degree nor is the arena in  which they operate. Thus we can and do understand non human life with some success and sometimes wonderful success, like Monty Roberts etc etc.
    Therefore I consider having views and impressions whatever about Sasquatch is quite valid and is valuable. I think there is a good chance peoples views will converge. With Sasquatch in the form of Patty I think it would be on the point that she is more than an ape and less than a human in basic characterictics. God bless her! 
     I dont think I would be alone in thinking that mans bipedalism is part of the reason and consequence of his hugh intelligence and the same would go for Sasquatch&#039;s particular level of intelligence. There are other reasons of course which did not apply to dinosaurs as far as we know and birds at least not yet. Sasquatch nearly fits in the human ecological niche and  this appears to be one that could lead to further advantage relatively. Or perhaps it is so well adjusted to its environment it needed not to progress. At least not untill now with mans appropration of the planet and messing up of its ecology.
     Not thinking Sasquatch is seen is an error of those outside cryptozoology, we know better. But my view is that Sasquatch is more than an ape from all the information that comes in, even though it still exhibits some ape behavoir. Still so do I, dont you ? Or is it apes and  Sasquatch exibit human behavoir? 
     I think sightings are proof within the context of other information but wouldnt quibble if others didnt see it that way. I would expect that they are valued as evidence though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DWA<br />
  Impressions, feelings, perceptions  about other human beings is what human are good at, some better than others. We learn and gather confidence about these abilities according to our interest and how successful we become with experience and practice. Its a normal useful and valuable part of inter-action with fellow humans and allows us to minimise arbitrary or wholly subjective descisions. So it may not be science as you know it but there is a lot more to life and humanity than science.<br />
   These kinds of skills are not limited to man except in degree nor is the arena in  which they operate. Thus we can and do understand non human life with some success and sometimes wonderful success, like Monty Roberts etc etc.<br />
    Therefore I consider having views and impressions whatever about Sasquatch is quite valid and is valuable. I think there is a good chance peoples views will converge. With Sasquatch in the form of Patty I think it would be on the point that she is more than an ape and less than a human in basic characterictics. God bless her!<br />
     I dont think I would be alone in thinking that mans bipedalism is part of the reason and consequence of his hugh intelligence and the same would go for Sasquatch&#8217;s particular level of intelligence. There are other reasons of course which did not apply to dinosaurs as far as we know and birds at least not yet. Sasquatch nearly fits in the human ecological niche and  this appears to be one that could lead to further advantage relatively. Or perhaps it is so well adjusted to its environment it needed not to progress. At least not untill now with mans appropration of the planet and messing up of its ecology.<br />
     Not thinking Sasquatch is seen is an error of those outside cryptozoology, we know better. But my view is that Sasquatch is more than an ape from all the information that comes in, even though it still exhibits some ape behavoir. Still so do I, dont you ? Or is it apes and  Sasquatch exibit human behavoir?<br />
     I think sightings are proof within the context of other information but wouldnt quibble if others didnt see it that way. I would expect that they are valued as evidence though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: norman-uk</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/igor09/comment-page-2/#comment-56399</link>
		<dc:creator>norman-uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=18347#comment-56399</guid>
		<description>Jeremy_Wells.
  
     I think we can assume Sasquatch is a master of its environment. It instinctively can use scent, sound and sight probably much better than homo sapein and knows how to become invisible. A master of its environment with no tools.

     Strangely humans neglect and abuse that wonderful sense of smell they possess. What a waste and what a loss to them.

     Its interesting to watch deer unoticed and down wind, they shouldnt be able to smell you but sooner or later they often do because of wind eddies, not apparent to the watcher. 

     How on earth does Sasquatch, a supposed part predator manage? It surely cannot turn of all its smell?  Perhaps it uses it in someway ?

     If Sasquatch DNA continues to be collected this should/could  build up a virtual halotype. But-science not being on board is it given proper respect and  attention?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy_Wells.</p>
<p>     I think we can assume Sasquatch is a master of its environment. It instinctively can use scent, sound and sight probably much better than homo sapein and knows how to become invisible. A master of its environment with no tools.</p>
<p>     Strangely humans neglect and abuse that wonderful sense of smell they possess. What a waste and what a loss to them.</p>
<p>     Its interesting to watch deer unoticed and down wind, they shouldnt be able to smell you but sooner or later they often do because of wind eddies, not apparent to the watcher. </p>
<p>     How on earth does Sasquatch, a supposed part predator manage? It surely cannot turn of all its smell?  Perhaps it uses it in someway ?</p>
<p>     If Sasquatch DNA continues to be collected this should/could  build up a virtual halotype. But-science not being on board is it given proper respect and  attention?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ella Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/igor09/comment-page-2/#comment-56383</link>
		<dc:creator>Ella Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=18347#comment-56383</guid>
		<description>I would like to very much agree with &quot;DMA&quot;.  Squatches are seen frequently--at least, for a creature that is not supposed to exist at all--but until the arrival of the Internet, and even to this day, almost none were ever reported except to the witness&#039;s family and/or closest friends, mainly for fear of ridicule.  If BF were already an acknowledged existing creature, verified by the scientific community, all those sightings would be accepted as a matter of ordinary fact.  But until and if then, people are even more ready to accept sightings of UFOs and their little gray pilots than to accept any Bigfoot sightings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to very much agree with &#8220;DMA&#8221;.  Squatches are seen frequently&#8211;at least, for a creature that is not supposed to exist at all&#8211;but until the arrival of the Internet, and even to this day, almost none were ever reported except to the witness&#8217;s family and/or closest friends, mainly for fear of ridicule.  If BF were already an acknowledged existing creature, verified by the scientific community, all those sightings would be accepted as a matter of ordinary fact.  But until and if then, people are even more ready to accept sightings of UFOs and their little gray pilots than to accept any Bigfoot sightings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWA</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/igor09/comment-page-2/#comment-56369</link>
		<dc:creator>DWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=18347#comment-56369</guid>
		<description>“You say you got the Afaransis wrong, the Orang wrong but now your impressions of Pattie are right? Sorry, I would have to bet on the wrong option! (I apologise if this dig seems mean it is not meant to be.)”

Hey.  My style requires a thick skin.  ;-)

Here was my point:  my impressions WERE wrong.  That is, they were impressions, backed by no evidence.  Just like the impression from looking at P/G that that has to be more than an ape.  (And there’s intelligent speculation that the orang is smarter than anything but us, at least by our standards of smart; so how far off was I?  ;-)  )  I simply don&#039;t get the impression you do from that film.  That it&#039;s bipedal?  Hey, BIRDS are bipedal.  Some LIZARDS (and lots of dinosaurs) are bipedal.  It works; so it shows up a lot.  It makes no predictions about intelligence, emotion, spirituality or soul.  It&#039;s an adaptation.  (I think wings are way cooler; but we seem to have more of a &#039;spark&#039; than anything that has them.)

I don’t see anything in the copious evidence I am aware of that suggests we’re dealing with anything other than a great ape that happens to be bipedal.  Which is, mind you, quite enough for me.  I think a lot of this they-must-be-more stuff comes from folks who don’t have a good grasp of the evidence – how much of it there is, and how very many people are seeing these animals.  The presumption is:  how can something like this never be seen?  And the truth is, it IS being seen, by lots of average Joes.  (A good bet with anything like this is that most encounters are never reported.  Most of the ones I read were submitted years after the encounter.)  Sasquatches get surprised; snuck up on; startled out of their wits; observed for long periods without knowing it; caught looking in kids&#039; bedroom windows; you name it.

People presume that lots of sightings amount to proof.  They don’t come anywhere close to proof, until science steps in and says yep, that’s proof.  And that’s a much more subjective – I don’t want to say arbitrary – process than people seem to think it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“You say you got the Afaransis wrong, the Orang wrong but now your impressions of Pattie are right? Sorry, I would have to bet on the wrong option! (I apologise if this dig seems mean it is not meant to be.)”</p>
<p>Hey.  My style requires a thick skin.  <img src='http://www.cryptomundo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Here was my point:  my impressions WERE wrong.  That is, they were impressions, backed by no evidence.  Just like the impression from looking at P/G that that has to be more than an ape.  (And there’s intelligent speculation that the orang is smarter than anything but us, at least by our standards of smart; so how far off was I?  <img src='http://www.cryptomundo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />   )  I simply don&#8217;t get the impression you do from that film.  That it&#8217;s bipedal?  Hey, BIRDS are bipedal.  Some LIZARDS (and lots of dinosaurs) are bipedal.  It works; so it shows up a lot.  It makes no predictions about intelligence, emotion, spirituality or soul.  It&#8217;s an adaptation.  (I think wings are way cooler; but we seem to have more of a &#8217;spark&#8217; than anything that has them.)</p>
<p>I don’t see anything in the copious evidence I am aware of that suggests we’re dealing with anything other than a great ape that happens to be bipedal.  Which is, mind you, quite enough for me.  I think a lot of this they-must-be-more stuff comes from folks who don’t have a good grasp of the evidence – how much of it there is, and how very many people are seeing these animals.  The presumption is:  how can something like this never be seen?  And the truth is, it IS being seen, by lots of average Joes.  (A good bet with anything like this is that most encounters are never reported.  Most of the ones I read were submitted years after the encounter.)  Sasquatches get surprised; snuck up on; startled out of their wits; observed for long periods without knowing it; caught looking in kids&#8217; bedroom windows; you name it.</p>
<p>People presume that lots of sightings amount to proof.  They don’t come anywhere close to proof, until science steps in and says yep, that’s proof.  And that’s a much more subjective – I don’t want to say arbitrary – process than people seem to think it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fhqwhgads</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/igor09/comment-page-2/#comment-56360</link>
		<dc:creator>Fhqwhgads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=18347#comment-56360</guid>
		<description>Has anyone tried setting up a trail MRI?  A curious sasquatch might just crawl into the machine, which would give us important information about their brain size and general anatomy.  Or has this been tried and they move too much, becoming MRI blobsquatches?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone tried setting up a trail MRI?  A curious sasquatch might just crawl into the machine, which would give us important information about their brain size and general anatomy.  Or has this been tried and they move too much, becoming MRI blobsquatches?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CryptoInformant 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/igor09/comment-page-2/#comment-56359</link>
		<dc:creator>CryptoInformant 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=18347#comment-56359</guid>
		<description>Jeremy, you&#039;re exactly right on that key point: many animals in nature use wind conditions to help themselves remain hidden from predators and/or prey. It wouldn&#039;t be exactly shocking to discover that Sasquatch does the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy, you&#8217;re exactly right on that key point: many animals in nature use wind conditions to help themselves remain hidden from predators and/or prey. It wouldn&#8217;t be exactly shocking to discover that Sasquatch does the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy_Wells</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/igor09/comment-page-2/#comment-56354</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy_Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=18347#comment-56354</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;cryptidsrus&quot;&gt;And thank goodness, you can have a relatively civilized discussion here without insults and disrespect, wouldn&#039;t you agree?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;d like to think so, under the better circumstances, yes. 

I also agree that the forensic evidence (i.e. the footprint and handprint evidence) would be enough to convict a man in a court of law, if it were his foot or hand print found at the crime scene. But, again, &lt;i&gt;its not enough to establish a holotype, and that is what we need.&lt;/i&gt;

Also, in addressing their ability to camouflage themselves, that is one of the aspects of the stealth I mentioned. Their coloration, for instance, reported as varying from dark to brown to reddish, is going to help them blend into the understory of dead brown leaves and rust colored pine needles, just as other animals do (the Lake Worth monster, which was reported as white, and therefore likely an albino if legitimate, being that notable &quot;exception that proves the rule&quot;). I know that I&#039;ve, for instance, walked in on bedded down whitetail and never spotted them until they jumped and ran when I got too close, and I consider myself rather observant. I&#039;ve even had them sneak in and bed down while I was sitting on stand, and I didn&#039;t spot them until I spooked them while walking out, across a clearing I&#039;ve been watching all day. So I&#039;ve no doubt that a flesh and blood bigfoot could do the same. (Provided he/she kept the wind moving from you, to him, to mask that trademark scent. An idea that is not far fetched considering humans seem to be the only critters in the woods, in my experience, that have a problem figuring that rule out.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="cryptidsrus"><p>And thank goodness, you can have a relatively civilized discussion here without insults and disrespect, wouldn&#8217;t you agree?</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d like to think so, under the better circumstances, yes. </p>
<p>I also agree that the forensic evidence (i.e. the footprint and handprint evidence) would be enough to convict a man in a court of law, if it were his foot or hand print found at the crime scene. But, again, <i>its not enough to establish a holotype, and that is what we need.</i></p>
<p>Also, in addressing their ability to camouflage themselves, that is one of the aspects of the stealth I mentioned. Their coloration, for instance, reported as varying from dark to brown to reddish, is going to help them blend into the understory of dead brown leaves and rust colored pine needles, just as other animals do (the Lake Worth monster, which was reported as white, and therefore likely an albino if legitimate, being that notable &#8220;exception that proves the rule&#8221;). I know that I&#8217;ve, for instance, walked in on bedded down whitetail and never spotted them until they jumped and ran when I got too close, and I consider myself rather observant. I&#8217;ve even had them sneak in and bed down while I was sitting on stand, and I didn&#8217;t spot them until I spooked them while walking out, across a clearing I&#8217;ve been watching all day. So I&#8217;ve no doubt that a flesh and blood bigfoot could do the same. (Provided he/she kept the wind moving from you, to him, to mask that trademark scent. An idea that is not far fetched considering humans seem to be the only critters in the woods, in my experience, that have a problem figuring that rule out.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ella Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/igor09/comment-page-2/#comment-56353</link>
		<dc:creator>Ella Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=18347#comment-56353</guid>
		<description>Correct in detail or not, Lidia Bourtsev&#039;s drawings and painting of the BF are absolutely beautiful!  And whether these creatures, whatever they are exactly, are truthful or not (I don&#039;t see why not), their portraits by Mrs. Bourtsev deserve a prize and critical acclaim in themselves.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct in detail or not, Lidia Bourtsev&#8217;s drawings and painting of the BF are absolutely beautiful!  And whether these creatures, whatever they are exactly, are truthful or not (I don&#8217;t see why not), their portraits by Mrs. Bourtsev deserve a prize and critical acclaim in themselves.  <img src='http://www.cryptomundo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
