Comments on: “Completely Human” Bigfoot Revisited

By: DWA

DWA — Mon, 19 May 2008 00:21:01 +0000

eireman says: “Furthermore, as one continues to manipulate the data in a digital image, the threat of artefacts increases. Taking a grainy old film, digitizing it, pushing the values to the limits… You’re just asking for trouble. …”

No kidding. The fetishization of evidence, taken to its (quite illogical) extreme.

People. We may be able to do stuff to a photo, or a film, that never could be done before.

Anybody ever consider that that might be the problem?

I hate sounding like a broken record (old technology; let’s iPod it and see how much better we can make it!!!!) here.

But. Nothing will replace good old-fashioned field research in confirming - by finding her buddies - that Patty is the real thing. We need to stop inhaling footprint-cast and film fumes. We have enough evidence - way more than enough, way more than we have had for any other species before its confirmation - to get started, right now.

There is only so much that can be gotten from a film. And we had it, forty years ago.

By: CamperGuy

CamperGuy — Sun, 18 May 2008 19:31:17 +0000

The day after and no news…………..

Methingks the ones who expressed their skepticism and were told “just wait unil Saturday’…and mildy chastised for not giving the benefiet of the doubt in previous associated blogs are owed an explanation and an apology.

I didn’t express skepticism since I take a wait and see attitude. Still waiting Others correctly did so.

The boy cried wolf but alas it turned out to be an otter.

By: Pibroch

Pibroch — Sun, 18 May 2008 18:18:05 +0000

This is balderdash. Neither MK Davis nor Wildphotographer at Grendel Films have been able to come up with anything beyond fanciful suggestions and pseudo-Rohrshach posturings to make the ‘evidence’ suit their findings.

Grendel Films have now ceased any participation in any further Bigfoot-related projects, and Davis has, it seems, nothing to say.

In other words, they hit the brick wall called reality, it hurt, and they’ve given up trying. Which is a source of some relief for those of us growing sick of their masonic, cliquish claims.

By: kittenz

kittenz — Sun, 18 May 2008 15:25:41 +0000

Somehow this entire sequence of nonevents reminds me of the fable of The Boy Who Cried Wolf…

By: Judy Green

Judy Green — Sun, 18 May 2008 04:42:54 +0000

I am happy to see this brought to the forefront again as I wondered why it just completely disappeared. I hope there is a conclusion of some sort this time.

By: DWA

DWA — Sun, 18 May 2008 00:15:58 +0000

I’m afraid MK Davis is gonna keep going until he undoes, and then some ten times over, all the good he’s done.

Can somebody talk to this guy?

PLEASE, SOMEBODY, prove Pattyfake so we can move on to the real evidence. All of the idiocy that surrounds P/G has poisoned it as evidence.

(And next time I watch it I’ll change my mind. Again. )

By: SOCALcryptid

SOCALcryptid — Sun, 18 May 2008 00:09:48 +0000

A lot of funny comments above. You all have a good sense of humor. That said, we should call this new species Homo Squatch and be done with it. That is if there is proof of this creature being a type of human.

By: MattBille

MattBille — Sat, 17 May 2008 22:56:00 +0000

OK, this is the opinion of one guy (me) who does not know Davis. The sequence of “announce and hide, then announce again” events makes it all much too suspicious. My opinion is that we are NEVER going to see definitive new evidence from this source. And we are not going to see important new evidence from the P-G film from anyone because there’s nothing useful that can be done with it that has not already been done.
Do I hope I’m wrong? Certainly. But I’d be shocked. Better to forget the whole bizarre matter ever occurred.

By: airforce47

airforce47 — Sat, 17 May 2008 20:29:28 +0000

We should remember one thing. Professor Loren Coleman firmly believes the species is other than Giganto. There are some valid scientific arguements to support his hypothesis as he has posted before.

I tend to agree with Loren but I feel we must wait for confirming DNA and other acceptable forensic evidence. Professor Meldrum got part of that evidence for the History Channel with the board screws. However, that evidence must be subject to intrepretation or we would see it presented as evidence for the discovery of a new species.

It may very well turn out that Marlon Davis is right. We just don’t know yet and I’m not going to jump on anybody’s band wagon until we have that evidence. Just MHO and my best to all,

Larry Lesh

By: CamperGuy

CamperGuy — Sat, 17 May 2008 20:24:45 +0000

graybear….I wondered who was in charge of security. I tall makes sense now.
Previously thought I’d add to the fun while we waited to see if anything was forthcoming. Late afternoon here and I see no reports of anything surprising or anything else for that matter.

What time is the speaking engagement? Later maybe?