Comments on: Best Nessie Footage Yet?

By: UltimateCryptid

UltimateCryptid — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:52:04 +0000

Has it occurred to any “Nessie” researchers to check with NASA and it’s satellites, whether at the exact time of day, Gordon Holmes’ video is indeed authentic? After-all, we all know many countries, besides the U.S. Gov’t. use spy satellites which can magnify an object, anywhere on Earth with precise accuracy.

Perhaps, Loren Coleman with his connections to influential people in the scientific world community could obtain this information. Also, the use of satellite technology to definitively help solve the Loch Ness enigma, would in my opinion, be of tremendous help. Any of these satellites can also be programmed to “Watch and Record” any animate activity on the Loch. Food for thought!

OK Loren, drink a V8 (lol) and Go Get them!!

By: CezA

CezA — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 06:03:22 +0000

And Another Thing , The Guy Who Did This Video

By: richsd40

richsd40 — Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:20:04 +0000

Of course, for over 40 years I have wanted Nessie to be real, so I find this footage extremely interesting! I agree with Loren that we always need to check on where anything presented as evidence comes from, but I also think that even if Mr. Holmes says he was with aliens this weekend, we need to take the video for what it shows. If the video stands up to professional scrutiny, I don’t think it matters who shot it or what their background is! Also, I find the post by Greenmartian several days ago about military testing on Loch Ness fascinating, and I wish he/she would come back on and elaborate on the subject! If that was all true, then to me, the debate of IF something is there is over!!! It would now only be WHAT is there?

By: DARHOP

DARHOP — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:59:51 +0000

Don’t see any hump either…

By: DARHOP

DARHOP — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:58:58 +0000

Hmmmm, sorry, but I still don’t see any head or flipper or anything other than shadow. No matter how slow or enhanced you show it. Just don’t see it. I see something, but to say it’s Nessie is like saying I’m Santa. Sorry.

I’m not saying I don’t believe there is something huge in the loch, (not saying I do either ) I’m just saying this film doesn’t show me much.

By: autosoul

autosoul — Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:14:01 +0000

peterbernard is totally right…a blur under a blur

By: coelacanth1938

coelacanth1938 — Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:22:29 +0000

Just a weird, weird idea…
Is it possible that the loch water can be “animated” somehow?

By: Saribou

Saribou — Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:03:31 +0000

To me, I am seeing something swiming with a bilateral paddling motion.

If you watch the video, right after the “hump” comes up, there is a water splash on the near side. This is folloed by a couple splashes on the far side after the “head” pops up. It’s not the easiest to see, but if you look for the white water spray, at the line of the water, you can see it, and it has rhythm. I was a fan of the tandem seal idea until I noticed the paddling motion.

By: Roger Knights

Roger Knights — Sat, 02 Jun 2007 12:50:23 +0000

UnitedCats wrote:
“An interesting and unusual confluence of boat wakes and/or other waves in the lake, but nothing more.”

For over a minute? (I forget what the actual length of time was.)

Confluences rarely last that long–they’re episodic.

By: peterbernard

peterbernard — Sat, 02 Jun 2007 11:47:43 +0000

I see a blur just next to the blur underneath a blur.