Comments on: Gorillas In Our Midst

By: pipdog

pipdog — Wed, 30 Aug 2006 05:40:53 +0000

It is well written and after all apes are apes, bigfoot or gorilla.

Furthermore, I’ve seen apes, now show me a real bigfoot!

By: twblack

twblack — Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:49:26 +0000

I think this was a well written article myself.

By: shumway10973

shumway10973 — Fri, 25 Aug 2006 06:39:48 +0000

well, it was obvious to me when I heard the beginning timeframe for the word gorilla, that anything bigger than your average known chimp or monkey had to be a gorilla. Us simple folk use the easiest words to get our point across. Oh, and just to let everyone know (no matter what side of the fense you are on) there are no news media that tells the news without their political agendas. That’s why I stopped watching them years ago. Thank God for Cryptomundo and unknowncountry, between the 2 I get more useful news than most people I know.

By: chaoscryptrid

chaoscryptrid — Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:58:53 +0000

Very insightful piece of work. But couldn’t bigfoot be considered in some way the american gorilla?

By: oldbutnotstupid

oldbutnotstupid — Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:21:55 +0000

thanks Loren, I asked for more information and you came through.

By: dbard

dbard — Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:05:41 +0000

Tapper:

Yours was a well-written post, but a little long-winded, don’t you think?

By: greywolf

greywolf — Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:21:44 +0000

I remember when I was a little kid the Ringling Bros/Barnum circus came to my town and my dad took me to see “Gargantua”. I was impressed but I was little at the time.

By: Dark-Obsessor

Dark-Obsessor — Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:20:52 +0000

I guess I’m an idiot to believe news sources before reports, claims, and such on here.

Besides, I believe something such as Bigfoot may exist somewhere, but, I doubt these claims were of one.

By: Loren Coleman

Loren Coleman — Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:21:49 +0000

Literary critics now, regarding length. LOL.

Actually, my placement of Fox was on purpose because they are so sensational about their “news.”

By: tapper

tapper — Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:50:47 +0000

A well written piece but a little long winded, don’t you think? Gorillas were top-of-mind back then but there was a real lack of knowledge about their size, geo distribution and the like that, so it only makes sense for people back then to refer to BF as a gorilla.

What bothers me about your article is the fact that you placed Fox News next to and before CNN. I would hardly call Fox an objective news source and, in fact, I think I’d believe anything I read on Cryptomundo before I’d believe Fox ‘News’