Comments on: Green’s Public Statement: The Tennessee Bigfoot Affair

By: Wolfblood

Wolfblood — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 02:49:37 +0000

I’m with miles dang it!! Let’s stop the squabbling this year and try to get the irrefutable footage (not blurry or grainy), footage of the point we’re all here. BIGFOOT!!

By: wookieehunter

wookieehunter — Tue, 25 Dec 2007 20:48:15 +0000

Well imaginary friend, the reason she still believes the stories is because there were enough people there to see that there was bf activity on the properties and one did speak to her she thought was fox as she put it if there is a fox. She does not believe 100% of what Jan has stated but she does not disbelieve 100% either. It is sort of lie the national enquirer with Jan, there is the base truth of bf but the facts she stated to Mary are skewed and this is why Mary parted from her due to all the lies. Since she is a researcher and was asked to research the area and when she did find evidence there was activity. Well what would any of you do?

bigfoot is singular as well as plural for the bf by the way.

By: Imaginary Friend

Imaginary Friend — Tue, 25 Dec 2007 07:32:03 +0000

If she believes Janice is a “pathological liar,” then why does she still believe the stories about Janice’s grandfather and his “work” with the Bigfoot(feet)? If someone lies about one thing, they will lie about anything, and that is called a hoax, which this always smelled like from the beginning.

By: wookieehunter

wookieehunter — Tue, 25 Dec 2007 03:48:24 +0000

I know Mary and have for years. She posted this because she wanted y’all to know what happened and is trying to salvage her rep. There were bf on the farm as she said and Jan lied to her as well so this is why she parted ways. This as well as some other things which made her realize it would be better to part company. Mary - pre Jan had a great reputation as being a good bf researcher. Most of you who do not know her only think that she helped Jan to perpetrate a fraud which she didn’t. She only wrote what Jan told her to write. This is what she is trying to do. As far as placing some of the videos online I will personally email her and ask her to do this. She wants to make a dvd not to make money but to place all the info on and show everyone who wants to know what she was trying to accomplish and what Jan said in her own words, not just bits and pieces.

Merry christmas and a happy new year all.

By: proriter

proriter — Mon, 24 Dec 2007 16:31:29 +0000

The best thing to come out of this too-typical sodden trailerish mess is FodderButWiser’s neologism “cringable.” WTG, FBW!

By: hlw

hlw — Sun, 23 Dec 2007 16:23:16 +0000

This is deja vu. In the fifties when ufo’s were the public rage, we had research groups lining up fighting each other, calling each others research bunk (and it mostly was). Now we have a contactee, wonderful. Why is so much time being spent on this woman? All it does is help legitimize a tale that so far has only shown us that a Russian “scientist” can catch a plastic deer. If there was a thread of a chance that any of this is real why haven’t all the field researchers been rushing to get there? The spirit of George Adamski lives on, if only in the minds of the extremely gullible.

By: Ole Bub

Ole Bub — Sun, 23 Dec 2007 15:30:02 +0000

Kudos to Mary Green…

Perhaps this will help shed some light on a very murky area…the “cottage industry” of Jan…JMHO

My experience with Mary has been honest and forthright…she always did what she promised. Friends and associates who know Mary, praise her integrity.

I understand Mary’s need to distance herself from Jan’s antics, especially of late.

There are many legitimate habituators nationwide…don’t throw the baby out with the bath water…because of a few miscreants…JMHO

Thanks to Craig and Loren for providing a visible platform to Mary.

live and let live…

ole bub and the dawgs

By: MountDesertIslander

MountDesertIslander — Sun, 23 Dec 2007 13:33:39 +0000

Ugghh.

This is same problem cryptid research has been plagued by since the Patterson film made its way onto the market. The field attracts some people that believe they will enjoy, or deserve, a windfall from their “encounter” with something unexplainable.

I understand the cruel realities of financial desperation many of the witnesses to something extraordinary deal with day to day. However, when one reads the allegations above it diminishes everyone who is involved in trying to shine light into these dark corners of the accepted order of things.

I applaude Loren for his honesty and courage in posting this ugly dispute on what is argueably the finest cryptid site on the internet. Although some will make their usual claim that this drama discredits all of us who are searching for the truth along with the charletans, it is always good to disclose the facts as they present themselves in order to avoid the charge of cover up and selective reporting. It takes a courageous man to objectively expose the warts and blemishes along with the classic profile and pleasing features of his field. In this way there is no legitimate charge of guilt by association or coverup. Keep up the good work Loren. You defend the legitimacy of cryptozoology and those of us on the peripheries with you even handed approach. Thank you.

By: Ceroill

Ceroill — Sun, 23 Dec 2007 09:19:43 +0000

Interesting. It would indeed be fascinating if any of this is true. I have no idea whether it is or not. Ah well, I guess we’ll see eventually, perhaps. Thanks for sharing it Loren.

By: Lee Pierce

Lee Pierce — Sun, 23 Dec 2007 02:58:43 +0000

More jibberish from people that only hurts the legitimate researchers chances to be taken seriously. However, Loren, I’m glad you put this on your site. We need all the info we can get about the loonies I consider our enemies if we are to win the battle of proving the existence of Bigfoot.