Comments on: The Goddard Bigfoot Video

By: jerrywayne

jerrywayne — Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:38:34 +0000

It should be noted: in Meldrum and Greenwell’s cited article, they argue, “after careful study”, that the film subject is “about 2.3m” in height, “shows the action of the gluteal muscle of the buttock during walking”, and seems to have spots of hair “rubbed off”, perhaps due to “sleeping side down or from rubbing a hip against a tree.” And, relating to genitalia: “One interpretation is that the subject is displaying an erect penis, perhaps as a form of threat…”

The investigators M and G seemed impressed, but also allowed for the possibility of a hoax.

By: korollocke

korollocke — Thu, 01 Apr 2010 05:24:33 +0000

This bogus clip would be a lot more entertaining if it were synced to the Baby Elephant Walk song or perhaps the Swinging Safari. Then we could get Will “the thrill” Varhario to show it at Thrillville to a sell out crowd and use the proceeds to fund real bigfoot reasearch, just a thought…..

By: Paul78

Paul78 — Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:37:45 +0000

Something wrong with that penis, flopping about like, that is not right!

And the size of the legs and movement reminds me of a guy in a suit, more specifically like Bear in the big blue house, where the body is low on the actors legs making the legs look much small and shuffle.

By: korollocke

korollocke — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:31:33 +0000

It’s the lightly colored long object that person in the crappy suit bobs up and down while starring directly at the camera man.

By: mefine

mefine — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:36:31 +0000

Hmmmm, something tells me my husband will suddenly become much more interested in my cryptozoology obsession.

By: Buckeyes1

Buckeyes1 — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:19:04 +0000

I will freely admit the footage is so dark and grainy as to be of little use however if it is a fake then the people responsible had to have gone up there with a fur suit a preconcieved notion to fake such a thing.

I doubt they just happened to have a fake gorilla or bigfoot suit hanging around in the back of the RV. Also, there were several people in that vehicle, you can hear their voices, so assuming they’re all in on the stunt, they’ve managed to keep their mouths shut for a fairly long time.

To the best of my knowlege, no ones come out and claimed they were the “man in the suit” or that they built the suit or sold them a cheap costume etc…. Now granted, none of this even comes close to proving this thing is in any way legitimate, I’m just pointing out some issues that haven’t been discussed as yet…..

By: DWA

DWA — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:01:31 +0000

I’m trying to find a “rubber dong for comedy effect” on the subject hominid.

I can’t. In fact, based on what is known, the subject hominid shouldn’t have a dong – of any sort – at all. The eye color and the gaze – particularly in the last photograph from the top – seem to be in line with what is frequently reported for the subject hominid.

Now, as to what is in the footage…

By: korollocke

korollocke — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:21:28 +0000

I’ve seen a more convincing sexual interest of an ape in a human female in INGAGI! Circa 1930! Great grandaddy of the hoax documentary. Much like this is, it (INGAGI!) was pushed as real. INGAGI! even teased the reveal of human/ape hybrids!

By: WolfGirl

WolfGirl — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:03:49 +0000

All I really see is a vaguely blobsquatchy shape. And I (perhaps luckily) don’t see this Bigfoot penis everyone seems to be talking about.

By: Loren Coleman

Loren Coleman — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:23:23 +0000

Okay, okay, korollocke, so you think this about Ms. Goddard, “Crappy looking suit, no muscles or clear shape.”

But how do you really feel about the video footage? Now don’t hold anything back!