As he also stated, the video of the sasquatch crossing the snowy road shot by father and son out getting firewood is more believable, and looks like the creature in my own sighting…large, massive but somewhat lanky from the shoulders down, a very large rounded head. curiously, there seems to be some “morphing” going on there too.

I’m reminded of the sighting of the “black blob” on the trail that morphed into the standing sasquatch figure that i read o the internet a while back.

Certainly some c-g expert would be able to tell if the morphing could be done digitally, but wouldn’t the movement be too fast for a human to hoax?

If mrdak loves hoaxes, he should read The Trickster and the Paranormal by hansen.

The terrain and grass disrupt a clear view of the lower left leg but the motions of this creature before it charges could not be reproduced by a human on their hands and knees. The sideways motion alone covers far too much ground per side step than what could be provided with the distance between 2 knees. As well when the creature lurtches the rear right leg can be clearly seen in full extension and it is clearly a non-human appendage.

If one can stop the original footage at 3:09.367 on the film counter 2 ears can be plainly seen on the top of the head. I cannot say for sure that the end of this film is for real but I cannot see any reason for the footage of this creature up to and including the charge that appears contrived given the limited methods I have for analysis.

When viewing cryptids and other rare subjects caught on film we need to be prepared to see motions and behaviours unlike anything observed previously. The highly unusual can give an instant illusion to a viewer, especially an inexperienced one, that whatever they are seeing is probably a fraud.

In my books this footage remains as indetermined and somewhat disturbing!

Peace

The whatsit is plainly standing in a small hollow with the bottoms of all four limbs obscured by the intervening terrain and vegetation. The clipped off view of the left rear leg does give something of the look of a human foot, but bear in mind that the same terrain would cut off the voew of the lower digitigrade leg.

Given the inconclusive nature of that “proof”, the hoax conclusion based on it goes out the window.

As I said earlier, hoax is quite possible by any of several means, but the “foot” certainly does not establish that it exists.

Tiger

Not that I think this film is real, but the last part at the end with the fangs, etc. is not necessarily an automatic disqualifier. I mean, the way the film seems to progress is that this creature moves quickly, the person filming it realizes it’s time to run for it, and then we see jumpy film like somebody running. It is almost like the person filming turned around to see how close the creature was and shielded his or her body from the impact, which could then bring the camera to a position to view that bared-teeth face.