I think that those who either proclaim a piece of evidence like this to be legitimate or a hoax are saddled with the burden of proof.

Fhqwhgads – Thank you.
I’m obviously leaning towards it being the real thing, but I can’t back it 100% without supporting evidence. That’s just a thing with me. I agree with Maholo X. It does merit further investigation.

The person who is submitting the supposed evidence is the one saddled with the burden of proof. It is not up to others to show proof of why the video is clearly a fake or just another blobsquatch.

This video is typical of most others – out of focus, shaky, pans away at a critical moment – plus the “yoo hoo, Bigfoot!” increases the suspicion that this is probably the father walking down the hill across the way in a monkey suit. The supposed “analysis” of the video above provides no useful information as to the size of the hominid, despite what the narrator says. Most likely this is another case of Homo Sapiens Monkeysuitus.

I won’t be surprised in we find out Biscardi is somehow involved.

Frankly, that admission makes you more honest, and therefore more credible, than most self-described cryptozoologists.

1. I overlaid the frame of the comparison footage to match location and size.
2. I knew the man was approximately 6′ tall. I enlarged the matched pictures up so that they were both the same size (I did this by matching trees and ground cover around the trees). Measuring the man on his frame, he was 1.1 inches tall. The creature slightly bent and a step back from the man was 1.27 inches tall. So, in the world of the two matching frames, if 1.1 inches tall equals 72 inches in living space, 1.27 equals slightly less than 89 inches in the same living space.
3. What does that mean? The “man walking in the suit slowly” is 7’4″ tall.

Is that scientifically accurate? No, I’m just some chump who knows how to use Photoshop, and my math is horrible beyond the basics. If it is even close to accurate, does that make it impossible to fake? No, but it does limit your likely suspects in the state of Georgia quite a bit.

The original footage is not out of focus and the subject on film moves fairly quickly at one point. I would even used the word swiftly. The video above is enlarged, giving it a distorted look, and I believe he even applied a slo-mo effect to the clip.

The original video is not conclusive proof, but it does merit closer consideration. There is something there. It’s large. It’s agile. It’s recent. My question – how do we “get serious investigators” involved?

BTW – I’m sure the family involved is not amenable to making their home address public so that every idiot with a gun will start shooting at anything that moves on their property. They may be willing to talk with a qualified researcher privately, however. Someone who is discrete and respectful. So that leads me to another question. How do we keep Biscardi away from these folks?