<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mystery Fish Photo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/fish-4-09/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/fish-4-09/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: planettom</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/fish-4-09/#comment-53766</link>
		<dc:creator>planettom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=14135#comment-53766</guid>
		<description>I used to think it was possibly a shark, hard to identify.  I am now leaning towards possible white sturgeon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to think it was possibly a shark, hard to identify.  I am now leaning towards possible white sturgeon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karmicGypsy</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/fish-4-09/#comment-53724</link>
		<dc:creator>karmicGypsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=14135#comment-53724</guid>
		<description>I have no expertise in anything  But, I lived in the Florida Keys in the 60's 70's and 80's. Similar scenes were common back then and forest ranger types wore similar hats as did regular guys who just had those hats. The trees look like hundreds I've seen before from the Keys up to South Carolina.

The creature though isn't something I recognize at all. It doesn't look anything like any shark I've ever seen and I've seen quite a few. I've seen them wash up dead and deteriorating, I've seen them skinned and cleaned with jaws removed. But I've never seen anything like that. 

It's been years but if I recall, to remove the jaws of any shark you have to cut away a lot more flesh and skin then you might think, which leaves a much larger gape.

I agree that it looks to have been shot and I also see a tail (small for the size but a tail none-the-less). What looks like a "smile" could be a blood trail from the mouth if the head was elevated and the whole thing turned. I can also see where the gill is.

To me the guy in the middle looks like his shirt should also be white but is very dirty. Maybe blood from cleaning the fish?  It also looks like it's on his upper pants.

I very rarely think these things (cryptid photos) are real but this one I do think is. Whether it's an actual cryptid or not, I have no idea.

Anyone know if it's ever been sent to National Geographic or the like to see if they can identify it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no expertise in anything  But, I lived in the Florida Keys in the 60&#8217;s 70&#8217;s and 80&#8217;s. Similar scenes were common back then and forest ranger types wore similar hats as did regular guys who just had those hats. The trees look like hundreds I&#8217;ve seen before from the Keys up to South Carolina.</p>
<p>The creature though isn&#8217;t something I recognize at all. It doesn&#8217;t look anything like any shark I&#8217;ve ever seen and I&#8217;ve seen quite a few. I&#8217;ve seen them wash up dead and deteriorating, I&#8217;ve seen them skinned and cleaned with jaws removed. But I&#8217;ve never seen anything like that. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s been years but if I recall, to remove the jaws of any shark you have to cut away a lot more flesh and skin then you might think, which leaves a much larger gape.</p>
<p>I agree that it looks to have been shot and I also see a tail (small for the size but a tail none-the-less). What looks like a &#8220;smile&#8221; could be a blood trail from the mouth if the head was elevated and the whole thing turned. I can also see where the gill is.</p>
<p>To me the guy in the middle looks like his shirt should also be white but is very dirty. Maybe blood from cleaning the fish?  It also looks like it&#8217;s on his upper pants.</p>
<p>I very rarely think these things (cryptid photos) are real but this one I do think is. Whether it&#8217;s an actual cryptid or not, I have no idea.</p>
<p>Anyone know if it&#8217;s ever been sent to National Geographic or the like to see if they can identify it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hetzer88</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/fish-4-09/#comment-53598</link>
		<dc:creator>hetzer88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=14135#comment-53598</guid>
		<description>I think it's real, some unknown shark perhaps, but to me, it is certainly a cryptid, and here's why.

First of all, I see a tail. A fish tail to be sure, on the far right, but a tail nevertheless. It is augmented the same way as a reptile would have a tail, so anything like a whale fetus is out. Laying more or less flat, and hard to see, to be sure, but it has a tail.

Secondly, blood. What looks like a wound at the top right of the head, looks like a bullet hole. And the blood spatter going down the side of the head, looks what it would be like if a creature got shot. The other blood aspect is right where there would technically be a throat. Where the head meets the body, it looks very dark, bloody as it were. That's from slitting it's throat. Pump a round in it's head and slit it's throat, just like they do when they hang up sharks.

Thirdly, where the head meets the body, look closely and you'll notice the coloration doesn't match. That's because it's a gill cover. Look on any fish, dead or alive, and when the gill cover is slightly open, it gives the impression of a larger more squared off head. Look at the coelacanth logo from Cryptomundo itself, the gill cover is squared off similar to this. 

Finally, the mouth. Although it looks drawn on or fake, the part that goes upwards at the back of the head could be part of the gill mechanism. Water goes inside the slit, flows over the gills, and exits. And remember, if we are trying to compare an unknown creature with an unknown body style to  known creatures with known body styles, they may not even come close to matching. It may be something completely different, exactly what I believe is pictured here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s real, some unknown shark perhaps, but to me, it is certainly a cryptid, and here&#8217;s why.</p>
<p>First of all, I see a tail. A fish tail to be sure, on the far right, but a tail nevertheless. It is augmented the same way as a reptile would have a tail, so anything like a whale fetus is out. Laying more or less flat, and hard to see, to be sure, but it has a tail.</p>
<p>Secondly, blood. What looks like a wound at the top right of the head, looks like a bullet hole. And the blood spatter going down the side of the head, looks what it would be like if a creature got shot. The other blood aspect is right where there would technically be a throat. Where the head meets the body, it looks very dark, bloody as it were. That&#8217;s from slitting it&#8217;s throat. Pump a round in it&#8217;s head and slit it&#8217;s throat, just like they do when they hang up sharks.</p>
<p>Thirdly, where the head meets the body, look closely and you&#8217;ll notice the coloration doesn&#8217;t match. That&#8217;s because it&#8217;s a gill cover. Look on any fish, dead or alive, and when the gill cover is slightly open, it gives the impression of a larger more squared off head. Look at the coelacanth logo from Cryptomundo itself, the gill cover is squared off similar to this. </p>
<p>Finally, the mouth. Although it looks drawn on or fake, the part that goes upwards at the back of the head could be part of the gill mechanism. Water goes inside the slit, flows over the gills, and exits. And remember, if we are trying to compare an unknown creature with an unknown body style to  known creatures with known body styles, they may not even come close to matching. It may be something completely different, exactly what I believe is pictured here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CryptidHuntr</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/fish-4-09/#comment-53544</link>
		<dc:creator>CryptidHuntr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=14135#comment-53544</guid>
		<description>Looks like a coelacanth. One was caught off the coast of Africa around the same time of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a coelacanth. One was caught off the coast of Africa around the same time of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bearcat</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/fish-4-09/#comment-53441</link>
		<dc:creator>Bearcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=14135#comment-53441</guid>
		<description>Just watched "River Monsters" last night on Animal Planet channel.  Jeremy Wade went in search of the wels catfish in Spain's Rio Ebro.  Could this be one of the "monster" catfish that still exist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just watched &#8220;River Monsters&#8221; last night on Animal Planet channel.  Jeremy Wade went in search of the wels catfish in Spain&#8217;s Rio Ebro.  Could this be one of the &#8220;monster&#8221; catfish that still exist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ctinn</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/fish-4-09/#comment-53396</link>
		<dc:creator>ctinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=14135#comment-53396</guid>
		<description>I once raised salamanders from eggs, and in the stage before they got legs they looked VERY much like this. Except they were an inch long. I would hate to see the salamander this guy would turn into!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once raised salamanders from eggs, and in the stage before they got legs they looked VERY much like this. Except they were an inch long. I would hate to see the salamander this guy would turn into!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pvolitans</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/fish-4-09/#comment-53392</link>
		<dc:creator>Pvolitans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=14135#comment-53392</guid>
		<description>Agree with SmoovRobG that it could be a skinned and gutted Frill Shark. The nodules near where the gill covers might've been look like the partly exposed gills which give the shark its name. 

See &lt;a href="http://www.fishbase.org/Photos/PicturesSummary.php?StartRow=1&#38;ID=635&#38;what=species&#38;TotRec=5" rel="nofollow"&gt;pic&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with SmoovRobG that it could be a skinned and gutted Frill Shark. The nodules near where the gill covers might&#8217;ve been look like the partly exposed gills which give the shark its name. </p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.fishbase.org/Photos/PicturesSummary.php?StartRow=1&amp;ID=635&amp;what=species&amp;TotRec=5" rel="nofollow">pic</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cryptidsrus</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/fish-4-09/#comment-53386</link>
		<dc:creator>cryptidsrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=14135#comment-53386</guid>
		<description>I'll be honest---I have no idea what that is.

If I HAVE to hazard a guess, I'd say skinned shark. 

Whatever it is---still a fascinating picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be honest&#8212;I have no idea what that is.</p>
<p>If I HAVE to hazard a guess, I&#8217;d say skinned shark. </p>
<p>Whatever it is&#8212;still a fascinating picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theprof</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/fish-4-09/#comment-53384</link>
		<dc:creator>theprof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=14135#comment-53384</guid>
		<description>The fish photo.  It looks like a partially butchered shark.  The back of the postcard has "AZO" printed in the "place your stamp here" square.  "AZO" usually stands for the Portuguese Azores where you will find exotic looking trees.  The weather made it a popular fishing/vacation spot in the early 20th century -fishing in Portuguese waters you caught many exotic fish as it was near Africa.  The guys do not look like they are military but wearing casual "rough gear".
 
Not sure if that helps or hinders things!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fish photo.  It looks like a partially butchered shark.  The back of the postcard has &#8220;AZO&#8221; printed in the &#8220;place your stamp here&#8221; square.  &#8220;AZO&#8221; usually stands for the Portuguese Azores where you will find exotic looking trees.  The weather made it a popular fishing/vacation spot in the early 20th century -fishing in Portuguese waters you caught many exotic fish as it was near Africa.  The guys do not look like they are military but wearing casual &#8220;rough gear&#8221;.</p>
<p>Not sure if that helps or hinders things!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean R. van Sommeran</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/fish-4-09/#comment-53382</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean R. van Sommeran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=14135#comment-53382</guid>
		<description>Also,

The camera's make and model could very well have been already antiquated by the time the photo was taken, being in a remote location it may have had that camera since it was new.

The make and model and film/digital specs can often greatly 'post-date' the time/date that the photo was taken.

Camera gear wasnt always as ubiquitous as today.

While the camera dated from the pre-1918 period it may have been in service many years later, especially if it depression era gov surplus.

I Think it is a decorated length of drift wood on a US Navy/USMC station during the 1920's. The photo likely had 'inside joke' significance to the fellows pictured.

I highly doubt anyone would carry a large smelly dead marine creature into their compound and park against a shed for a photo.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also,</p>
<p>The camera&#8217;s make and model could very well have been already antiquated by the time the photo was taken, being in a remote location it may have had that camera since it was new.</p>
<p>The make and model and film/digital specs can often greatly &#8216;post-date&#8217; the time/date that the photo was taken.</p>
<p>Camera gear wasnt always as ubiquitous as today.</p>
<p>While the camera dated from the pre-1918 period it may have been in service many years later, especially if it depression era gov surplus.</p>
<p>I Think it is a decorated length of drift wood on a US Navy/USMC station during the 1920&#8217;s. The photo likely had &#8216;inside joke&#8217; significance to the fellows pictured.</p>
<p>I highly doubt anyone would carry a large smelly dead marine creature into their compound and park against a shed for a photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
