When will we see a single, clear picture of Malaysia bigfoot or from Fox, the english-speaking bigfoot?

From these 2 stories in particular I see discussion, drawings, more discussion, and the development of a whole “anthropology” based in Bigfoot, its customs, speech, hunting methods, burial rites, reproductive issues, childcare, paranormal powers, telepathy, religious beliefs.

Please, stop suppositions. They are fiction. They belong to the realm of entertainment stories and mythology.
Until we DO prove something. Scientifically. Then we will know if there’s really a guy lurking in the woods, just trying to make his own business like any other.

First of all, Sean Ang is certainly no photography expert, and we can’t rely on his opinions to reach any kind of conclusion about the photos. That remark he made is a clear sign of his lack of photography knowledge. Like a couple of you have mentioned correctly, the angle of the shot indicates that either the photographer was in a position level with the creature or, if he’s in a three-storey-high tree, some distance away, using a zoom lens. Now, assuming he was really up a tree as claimed, he would have to be quite a distance away, which would mean the use of a flash would have been (a)ineffective at all (b)impossible to cause such pupil reaction, especially when the creature is looking away as is obvious in the sketch.

Secondly, I have this feeling that Vincent and Sean are both frantically looking for more hard evidence, including the creatures themselves, before they would show the photos. The reason is simple: They have to convince themselves first. As we know, neither of them has actually seen the real thing - only the photos were shown to them. If you were in their shoes, wouldn’t you want to be absolutely sure or risk making a fool of yourself? Of course, Vincent had already made the initial mistake of committing himself with the claim that he has evidence (if I’m not wrong, the photos were mentioned later) of the creatures’ existence. He and Sean are, like I said, probably trying all they can to gather more solid evidence to support this claim.

The “Yeti de Bourganeuf” allusion is just another nail in the Johor Bigfoot big coffin. The worst part of it, I’m afraid, is that it will bring further discredit to legitimate field researchers, at least in the eyes of the general public.