What ever! Another mind thinking the BFRO’s sole purpose is to make a buck. Another person ridiculing the group, but afraid to wallet up to find out for themselves what it is really all about. You know, it could be your neighbor putting huge prints miles out in the forest too. Could be him running around making all these vocalizations. Could be your neighbor banging on trees at all hours of night.
Wasn’t their an old saying: Went like,
Don’t knock it until you’ve tried it!

I was simply agreeing with ALIVEGARDEN that if one decides between Biscardi and BFRO, the “better” one is BFRO—-by miles. I actually disagree with ALIVEGARDEN that BFRO is bad—like I said, I like Moneymaker. ALIVEGARDEN apparently does not quite share my feelings.

At least this far: the biggest harm that I think comes to cryptozoology is cryptos vs. cryptos.

The scoftics are the ones who are all wet here, yet I see very little ammo being delivered their way. They essentially crap all over sas research, and they are all but embraced. Or at least approached shyly, with hat in hand. What is with that?

When you can show me a sasquatch, on film or in person, you can start telling me what’s wrong about what everyone else is doing.

Until then there are two databases to read to find out all the sensible speculation: TBRC’s, and BFRO’s.

I may go less with the field methods of the latter than I do with the former. But nothing’s delivered the scientific goods yet, hmmm?

’nuff said, as Stan the Man says!

Strange.

In what way, shape or form is the BFRO evil? Why is every one so down on the BFRO? I know I use to be probably the biggest skeptic about the BFRO. BUT, like I said I am willing to pay to find out for myself what they are all about. 300 $ really isn’t that much $. Hell a Charter fishing trip cost ya 100 $ a day easy. Why all the negativeness towards the BFRO and MM. All they are trying to do is learn all they can about an animal that supposedly doesn’t exist. So they can figure out the next best step to take to protect them. Like I said, I was right where you are with my feeling towards the BFRO. Until about a year ago. I started to thinking, hmmm what if these people are for real. What better way to learn some things and maybe hear or see something, than with a group that does this regularly in all areas of our country and Canada. I’m walleting up to find out for myself as opposed to sit behind my computer and be ridiculed like I use to. Lesser of two evils? I just don’t get that.

Moneymaker certainly is a “good egg,” so to speak. At least as far as I know. I agree with CAMPERGUY that Biscardi is good only for entertainment.

I also agree with ALIVEGARDEN that BFRO is WAY more the lesser of two evils.

Biscardi DOES bring attention to Bigfoot Research in general but definitely NOT the attention the field needs or wants.

Best not to say “we found Bigfoot” unless one has the goods to make everyone else agree with that assessment.