<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wild Woman of the Forest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/eugenie-scott/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/eugenie-scott/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: maico490</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/eugenie-scott/#comment-54246</link>
		<dc:creator>maico490</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 02:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=10435#comment-54246</guid>
		<description>What I have notice about the all the non-believer is (including my friends) none of them have spent time in the back country of our mountains. The last time I went backpacking in the High Sierras I heard something walk on two feet behind are tent. I was to chicken sh@t to look out. This was 20 miles into the back country in the mid of the night. What ever it was took are food that we had way up in the tree. We were there for 5 days and did not see another soul around on the trail in. We left that day because we had no food left. I told my Dad what I heard and he said it was a bear. I just left it at that and didn't say anything else. After that I became a believer. I still get chills thinking about that night, no moon out and the wind blowing through the trees. I have not gone backpacking since that time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I have notice about the all the non-believer is (including my friends) none of them have spent time in the back country of our mountains. The last time I went backpacking in the High Sierras I heard something walk on two feet behind are tent. I was to chicken sh@t to look out. This was 20 miles into the back country in the mid of the night. What ever it was took are food that we had way up in the tree. We were there for 5 days and did not see another soul around on the trail in. We left that day because we had no food left. I told my Dad what I heard and he said it was a bear. I just left it at that and didn&#8217;t say anything else. After that I became a believer. I still get chills thinking about that night, no moon out and the wind blowing through the trees. I have not gone backpacking since that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CryptidHuntr</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/eugenie-scott/#comment-52782</link>
		<dc:creator>CryptidHuntr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 02:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=10435#comment-52782</guid>
		<description>I agree with mystery_man I would pay to see her debate with Loren Coleman. Loren would most likely win : )

If so many people have seen it and just about every culture has their own version of it then.... is she saying the whole world is creating a hoax, a lie? How is that possible? So many responsible and trustworthy people have seen it. Is she calling President Theodore Roosevelt a liar??!!! (Yes he has seen and heard bigfoot) I wonder why some skeptics don't have an open mind to new and unidentified things. People didn't believe that a colacanth could actually exist yet some people did claim to see it and have pictures of them. Yet once a skeptic found it and analized it, it was proven. Same with the mountain gorilla. Nobody believed that it existed and here it is. Why cant the same happen with Bigfoot? Everything will be discovered some time in the future. Why not now???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with mystery_man I would pay to see her debate with Loren Coleman. Loren would most likely win : )</p>
<p>If so many people have seen it and just about every culture has their own version of it then&#8230;. is she saying the whole world is creating a hoax, a lie? How is that possible? So many responsible and trustworthy people have seen it. Is she calling President Theodore Roosevelt a liar??!!! (Yes he has seen and heard bigfoot) I wonder why some skeptics don&#8217;t have an open mind to new and unidentified things. People didn&#8217;t believe that a colacanth could actually exist yet some people did claim to see it and have pictures of them. Yet once a skeptic found it and analized it, it was proven. Same with the mountain gorilla. Nobody believed that it existed and here it is. Why cant the same happen with Bigfoot? Everything will be discovered some time in the future. Why not now???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/eugenie-scott/#comment-52731</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=10435#comment-52731</guid>
		<description>I watched it.

I had to after she called a Basking Shark a whale.  16 mins in.

I liked the way she spoke about the mystic Bigfoot.  It can do magic.  If that does not say "This is a joke subject" I do not know what else she could say.  Using her logic most of the creatures in the rainforests I have been to do not exist because I have not seen their skeletons littering the ground.  People must be immortal because I have never seen a dead body in the streets.

The best comment was the fact that if a Wildman existed then we would have to throw out all our concepts of science.  Just like when scientists tell us the set conditions for life.  Then they discover creatures that live on the side of under water volcanoes that conflict with the set Scientific Conditions for Life.  She needs to go to those creatures and explain that they can not exist because it confilicts with known concepts of science.

As I recall "Being on a train travelling 35 mph would suck the air out of your lungs".  That was science.  Imagine the state of the world if we stuck to that fact.

I also like the comment of the discovery of some of the new species of animal.  They have recently been discovered by western scientist but the locals have know about them for a long time.  I find it interesting that some of the locals have been talking about creatures that are odd.  But therefore can not exist because western scientist have not seen them.

I find there is more to the some of the stories that locals tell.  You just have to carve away the magical element and you can find a bit of truth.

Chinese Dragon.  Take away the magic.  You are left with an Oarfish.  Still impressive.  Very real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched it.</p>
<p>I had to after she called a Basking Shark a whale.  16 mins in.</p>
<p>I liked the way she spoke about the mystic Bigfoot.  It can do magic.  If that does not say &#8220;This is a joke subject&#8221; I do not know what else she could say.  Using her logic most of the creatures in the rainforests I have been to do not exist because I have not seen their skeletons littering the ground.  People must be immortal because I have never seen a dead body in the streets.</p>
<p>The best comment was the fact that if a Wildman existed then we would have to throw out all our concepts of science.  Just like when scientists tell us the set conditions for life.  Then they discover creatures that live on the side of under water volcanoes that conflict with the set Scientific Conditions for Life.  She needs to go to those creatures and explain that they can not exist because it confilicts with known concepts of science.</p>
<p>As I recall &#8220;Being on a train travelling 35 mph would suck the air out of your lungs&#8221;.  That was science.  Imagine the state of the world if we stuck to that fact.</p>
<p>I also like the comment of the discovery of some of the new species of animal.  They have recently been discovered by western scientist but the locals have know about them for a long time.  I find it interesting that some of the locals have been talking about creatures that are odd.  But therefore can not exist because western scientist have not seen them.</p>
<p>I find there is more to the some of the stories that locals tell.  You just have to carve away the magical element and you can find a bit of truth.</p>
<p>Chinese Dragon.  Take away the magic.  You are left with an Oarfish.  Still impressive.  Very real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spinach Village</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/eugenie-scott/#comment-52536</link>
		<dc:creator>Spinach Village</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 06:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=10435#comment-52536</guid>
		<description>So she gets a lot of time for a one sided argument? Wow, OK, don't know if I'll actually make it through, but it seems that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So she gets a lot of time for a one sided argument? Wow, OK, don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;ll actually make it through, but it seems that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystery_man</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/eugenie-scott/#comment-52399</link>
		<dc:creator>mystery_man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 23:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=10435#comment-52399</guid>
		<description>DWA- Exactly. Scott is preaching this stuff as absolute fact, yet avoiding the inconvenient matter of actually debating with informed scientists on the matter. This is irresponsible. Scientists do not always agree with each other, and they usually engage in a lot of peer review, which can be oft times a scathing and almost Darwinian process. You can't just spout off your ideas, cherry pick data,  and expect people to accept it as fact while at the same time avoiding any meaningful criticism from other scientists who may disagree with you. This is especially the case when you are trying to make a case for something outside of your own field without so much as even looking at or entertaining the evidence from scientists within that field. If she wants to get in this arena, she has to put her money where her mouth is and be subjected to cross examination by informed scientists within cryptozoology, and actually listen to what they have to say. 

I'd love to see a debate between her and Loren. I'd pay to see that. :)

I just have to say that it is Ok to question Ms. Scott's assertions. Don't be cowed because she has an advanced degree or think she must be right because of that degree. Science is all about questioning what you see, it is a hallmark of science, and you do not have to even be a scientist to do so. Imagine what the world would be like if no one questioned or debated new findings, assertions, or hypotheses. Chaos, madness, we'd still be in the Dark Ages, bloodletting our five humors and thinking that a flat Earth is circled by the sun. 

I say in this situation, take any good points she makes to heart, don't write her off completely (after all, that's not what you want her to do either), but be ready to question what you here and be able to back up your arguments against with data. The more data you have that the proposer of something you do not agree with does not, the more your case will hold up and the more useful your observations will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DWA- Exactly. Scott is preaching this stuff as absolute fact, yet avoiding the inconvenient matter of actually debating with informed scientists on the matter. This is irresponsible. Scientists do not always agree with each other, and they usually engage in a lot of peer review, which can be oft times a scathing and almost Darwinian process. You can&#8217;t just spout off your ideas, cherry pick data,  and expect people to accept it as fact while at the same time avoiding any meaningful criticism from other scientists who may disagree with you. This is especially the case when you are trying to make a case for something outside of your own field without so much as even looking at or entertaining the evidence from scientists within that field. If she wants to get in this arena, she has to put her money where her mouth is and be subjected to cross examination by informed scientists within cryptozoology, and actually listen to what they have to say. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to see a debate between her and Loren. I&#8217;d pay to see that. <img src='http://www.cryptomundo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I just have to say that it is Ok to question Ms. Scott&#8217;s assertions. Don&#8217;t be cowed because she has an advanced degree or think she must be right because of that degree. Science is all about questioning what you see, it is a hallmark of science, and you do not have to even be a scientist to do so. Imagine what the world would be like if no one questioned or debated new findings, assertions, or hypotheses. Chaos, madness, we&#8217;d still be in the Dark Ages, bloodletting our five humors and thinking that a flat Earth is circled by the sun. </p>
<p>I say in this situation, take any good points she makes to heart, don&#8217;t write her off completely (after all, that&#8217;s not what you want her to do either), but be ready to question what you here and be able to back up your arguments against with data. The more data you have that the proposer of something you do not agree with does not, the more your case will hold up and the more useful your observations will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhotoExpert</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/eugenie-scott/#comment-52393</link>
		<dc:creator>PhotoExpert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=10435#comment-52393</guid>
		<description>mystery_man--Hey! I see you have noticed my lack of posting. However, I have not been absent. I read Cryptomundo each and every single day. I just have been extremely busy.

I opened my third business. Owning and operating all three entities, ate up more free time than I thought it would. So I barely had time to read, let alone, post!

Also, not to blow my own horn, but I did something that took a lot of guts, morals, and ethics. Let's just say I went up against the big boys to protect children. Sort of a whistleblower scenario. As a result of that, word got out on who this heroic whistleblower was and I have been inundated by the press. I think I have some inkling of how Loren feels. TV stations and interviews, radio shows, and newspaper reporters! It's just a little overwhelming since I am not use to it. I do not know how Loren does it each and every time a cryptid comes into the news. 

God Bless You Loren!

Good hearing from you mystery_man! I read all of your posts! Frankly, even if I had the time I would have nothing to add to the thread, since you cover them so brilliantly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mystery_man&#8211;Hey! I see you have noticed my lack of posting. However, I have not been absent. I read Cryptomundo each and every single day. I just have been extremely busy.</p>
<p>I opened my third business. Owning and operating all three entities, ate up more free time than I thought it would. So I barely had time to read, let alone, post!</p>
<p>Also, not to blow my own horn, but I did something that took a lot of guts, morals, and ethics. Let&#8217;s just say I went up against the big boys to protect children. Sort of a whistleblower scenario. As a result of that, word got out on who this heroic whistleblower was and I have been inundated by the press. I think I have some inkling of how Loren feels. TV stations and interviews, radio shows, and newspaper reporters! It&#8217;s just a little overwhelming since I am not use to it. I do not know how Loren does it each and every time a cryptid comes into the news. </p>
<p>God Bless You Loren!</p>
<p>Good hearing from you mystery_man! I read all of your posts! Frankly, even if I had the time I would have nothing to add to the thread, since you cover them so brilliantly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWA</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/eugenie-scott/#comment-52366</link>
		<dc:creator>DWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=10435#comment-52366</guid>
		<description>Aaron7531:

"What do we know from science?"

That's your cue that she thinks she's talking to a room of numbskulls.

I keep saying this:  why don't they debate the scientists who disagree with them?  Shoot, they get carved up when they come here.  I'd have a field day with this lady, and I don't even have a science degree.

Some scientists remind me of some priests; their religion is a Great Mystery.  They practice it; but understanding it is beyond them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron7531:</p>
<p>&#8220;What do we know from science?&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s your cue that she thinks she&#8217;s talking to a room of numbskulls.</p>
<p>I keep saying this:  why don&#8217;t they debate the scientists who disagree with them?  Shoot, they get carved up when they come here.  I&#8217;d have a field day with this lady, and I don&#8217;t even have a science degree.</p>
<p>Some scientists remind me of some priests; their religion is a Great Mystery.  They practice it; but understanding it is beyond them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron7531</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/eugenie-scott/#comment-52355</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron7531</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 03:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=10435#comment-52355</guid>
		<description>She talks in front of a bunch of people who have no knowledge to debate her. If she went up against Loren, she would get smoked. I think it's funny how these great skeptics never debate anyone with any knowledge. I mean if she has not studied the bigfoot evidence what makes her such an expert on the subject? Ridiculous. Scientists are supposed to question everything. She obviously made up he mind before hand and twisted the "evidence" she wanted to use to her advantage and skipped over anything damaging to her case. Pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She talks in front of a bunch of people who have no knowledge to debate her. If she went up against Loren, she would get smoked. I think it&#8217;s funny how these great skeptics never debate anyone with any knowledge. I mean if she has not studied the bigfoot evidence what makes her such an expert on the subject? Ridiculous. Scientists are supposed to question everything. She obviously made up he mind before hand and twisted the &#8220;evidence&#8221; she wanted to use to her advantage and skipped over anything damaging to her case. Pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: feralhiker</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/eugenie-scott/#comment-52348</link>
		<dc:creator>feralhiker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=10435#comment-52348</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed the talk, thank you for posting this.  I wish she were a bit more familiar with some of the Bigfoot literature, she did make some mistakes which reduces credibility.  The most glaring I noticed was putting the crippled footprint from northern California when it was from Bossburg, WA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed the talk, thank you for posting this.  I wish she were a bit more familiar with some of the Bigfoot literature, she did make some mistakes which reduces credibility.  The most glaring I noticed was putting the crippled footprint from northern California when it was from Bossburg, WA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystery_man</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/eugenie-scott/#comment-52343</link>
		<dc:creator>mystery_man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=10435#comment-52343</guid>
		<description>PhotoExpert- Haven't seen you pop up here for quite awhile. Good to see you still comment sometimes, since your input is very much appreciated. :) Very good comment here. Well said, sir!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PhotoExpert- Haven&#8217;t seen you pop up here for quite awhile. Good to see you still comment sometimes, since your input is very much appreciated. <img src='http://www.cryptomundo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Very good comment here. Well said, sir!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
