Cryptomundo » Shunka Warak'in: DNA Results?

Shunka Warak'in: DNA Results?

Posted by: Loren Coleman on May 27th, 2009

Since I’ve been talking a great deal about the Shunka Warak’in lately, one of the most frequent questions that comes up is about the “DNA results.”

For example, here is one inquiry from yesterday (no, I don’t make these up; I don’t have to):

“OK. The mount of the Ringdocus (and I use Ringdocus because I can’t spell Shunka Warak’in) was found and DNA samples taken, but I never found out about the results. Does anyone know what resulted from the testing? I love this cryptid BTW.”

The actual fact is that no one has done any DNA testing on the hair, fur, hide, or alleged teeth of the mount going by the names “Ringdocus,” “Shunka Warak’in,” and “Mystery Beast,” now housed in a museum in Ennis, Montana.

Shunka Warakin

Shunka Warak’in.

Simply put, the animal is caught in a spider’s web of red tape. The stalling point presently is that the animal is in one museum on exhibition, but the taxidermy mounted animal does not belong to that museum. It has only borrowed from another museum. The current exhibiting museum does not have the legal right to order a DNA test.

Although pressure is being placed on them to obtain DNA testing, privately and confidentially, I’ve been told there seems to be some active lobbying being done to avoid conducting the test.

It seems that some of the powers that be are resisting doing any DNA testing because they wish to retain the mysterious mystic of the taxidermy item.

Indeed, both museums may feel some need to not have a test done due to their sense it would be a less attractive exhibit.

Of course, from both zoological and cryptozoological points of view, now that this item, the classic Ringdocus has been discovered after over a century, I do not feel any of the enigmatic nature of the animal will be lessened if a final scientific verdict is given on what it’s DNA says it is.

Photographs © Lance Foster 2009

Support the International Cryptozoology Museum!

Thank You.

Shunka Warak'in: Historically Defined (0)

This entry was posted on Wednesday, May 27th, 2009 at 12:01 am and is filed under CryptoZoo News, Cryptomundo Exclusive, Cryptotourism, Cryptozoologists, Cryptozoology, Evidence, Forensic Science, Museums, Shunka Warak'in. You can follow responses via our RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response or trackback from your site.

Spread the Word!

del.icio.us Digg Furl Reddit StumbleUpon Help

Similar Phenomena:

7 Responses to “Shunka Warak'in: DNA Results?”

maeko responds: May 27th, 2009 at 10:00 am
the likelihood of viable DNA seems to be low, given the method of preservation. as i mentioned before, an x-ray may yield clues that are interpretable by an expert, but open-ended enough to leave spectulation for those that wish to see it. it may be a more palatable first step to the museum. should something unusual be found, they may jump on the DNA test.
Greg102 responds: May 27th, 2009 at 11:53 am
Any honest, truth seeking person in cryptozoology wants to get to the TRUTH no matter the result, whether that confirms a cryptid or a known animal. They need to do a DNA test and get to the bottom of this. Anyone not wanting a DNA test in my opinion doesn’t want the true facts to surface. Why? I guess that tells a lot, but for the people who have no time for lies, hoaxes, and mystery, and only want the truth would see absolutely no rational decision not to do the test.
shumway10973 responds: May 27th, 2009 at 12:11 pm
Unfortunately most museums and places that show off the weird and so far unexplained make their money that way. You kill the mystery and there is a good chance they lose a lot of money. They are not usually run by “true cryptozology” seekers.
norman-uk responds: May 27th, 2009 at 6:03 pm
One thing about hair, it provides a very good refuge for DNA protecting it from both decay and contamination within the strands. Mitochondrial DNA is favoured, but nuclear DNA is also found. Hair is not usually treated with preservatives is it and if it was any DNA might still be intact because of the natural protection given. Personally i’m rather sceptical of DNA results which deal with cryptids!

I also wonder if there is any connection with the ‘mississippi hyena’ and less likely the ‘maine mutant’. Both on this site.

Greg102 I think you’ll miss all the fun if you want your facts straight ie without any mystery. Bit like a flower in black and white!

.
graybear responds: May 27th, 2009 at 6:39 pm
The Shunka Wara’kin is very obviously a canid; from the looks of it I’d guess that it’s most likely a wolf-coyote hybrid. Possibly it had some puppyhood disease, malnutrition or trauma which was responsible for the other physical oddities. Most of those oddities might very well have been due to poor (or possibly very deliberate and deforming) taxidermy. Then, too, it might simply have been an unfortunate, misshapen sport. A lot of people seem to forget just how different some members of any species might be from the norm for that species (think elephant man). In fact, my wife and I once had an old cat which had a facial profile which was almost identical to the slope of the Shunka Warak’in’s face; this was the result of the man (?) who owned her before she came to live with us using her as a target for thrown (empty) quart beer bottles.
There isn’t necessarily anything cryptic about some deformed individuals; visit a Veterans’ hospital if you think different. Trauma can explain an awful lot, especially if it is years old and mostly recovered from.
There is also the idea that DNA testing can explain anything. It can’t. There has to be an accepted model for DNA results to be compared against. It isn’t like a pregnancy test where blue means safe and pink means pregnant, no blue is wolf, pink is dog, purple is coyote, green is fox, brown is dire wolf.
The best that DNA tests on the Shunka Warak’in would show would be wolf, coyote, dog, some mixture of the three, or unknown canine. Until someone has a clue about what the Shunka Warak’in might be (other than a known canine of some sort) and there is a standard model of this creature to compare it to, DNA testing would be virtually useless.
springheeledjack responds: May 27th, 2009 at 7:24 pm
And people always wonder why cryptozoology has such a hard time coming up with anything…between actually finding something and then having to wade through politics, red tape, and just plain old fashioned pride, it’s a wonder anything ever gets discovered.

Since I’m on a tirade, I may as well add on to it…I watched the show entitled “Link” the other night about the primate skeleton. What bothered me the most was the first few minutes where the main guy (I forget his name, but then I am like that with names if I don’t say it at least five or six times…), went to a trade show–he talked about how real fossil finds are often snatched up by private collectors and never see the light of day…I know it happens and I understand the black market, but it ticks me because in all likelihood there could be some solid evidence for all kinds of things sitting in people’s private vaults and homes and we’ll never see it…

like the supposed 30’s footage of Nessie that has apparently been partially shown, and then locked in a vault by the owners (who I understand have died).

Alright, I’m done venting, but I’m still ticked by all the of the “red tape” that goes on in this world…go get ‘em Loren!
afigbee responds: October 10th, 2009 at 2:30 pm
Seems to have the certain something you see in the Tasmanian Devil.

Leave your comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.

|Top | Content|

Cryptomundo
for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More

Shunka Warak'in: DNA Results?

Spread the Word!

7 Responses to “Shunka Warak'in: DNA Results?”

Leave your comments

Main Page

Join The Search

Mystery Pages

Login

Advertisement

Syndication

Donate Today

The Beyond

Advertisement

T 84 Viagra

taking viagra after the expiration date

cheap gerneric viagra

generic viagra levitra and cialis pills!

cheap gerneric viagra

cheap gerneric viagra

cheap gerneric viagra

Non Prescription Viagra

Viagra Illegal Phillipines

Side Affects Of Viagra

Buy Viagra Online At

taking viagra woman

Viagra And Cannabis

generic viagra levitra and cialis pills!

Viagra Bon Marche

taking viagra woman

Impotence Viagra

cheap gerneric viagra